Important Information
This Summary of Safety and Clinical Performance (SSCP) is intended
to provide public access to an updated summary of the main aspects
of the safety and clinical performance of the device. This SSCP is
not intended to replace the Instructions for Use as the main
document to ensure the safe use of the device, nor is it intended
to provide diagnostic or therapeutic suggestions to intended users
or patients.
Applicable Documents
| Document Type |
Document Title / Number |
| Design History File (DHF) |
05028, 11013-A1, 11013, 11014-A1, 11014-A2, 11014, 11015
|
| ‘MDR Documentation’ File Number |
MDR-017 |
1. Device Identification and General Information
Device Trade Name(s): Pro-Line® Power Injectable
Central Venous Catheters
Manufacturer Name and Address: Medical
Components, Inc. 1499 Delp Drive Harleysville, PA 19438 USA
Manufacturer Single Registration Number (SRN):
US-MF-000008230
Basic UDI-DI: 00884908290NE
Medical Device Nomenclature: C010203 – Central
Venous Catheters, Partially Tunneled
Class of Device: III
Date First CE Certificate Issued: Pro-Line® -
October 2008
Authorized Representative Name and SRN: Gerhard
Frömel European Regulatory Expert Medical Product Service GmbH
(MPS) Borngasse 20 35619 Braunfels, Germany SRN: DE-AR-000005009
Notified Body Name and Single Identification Number:
BSI Group The Netherlands B.V. NB2797
Device Grouping and Variants
The devices in scope of this document are all central venous
catheter (CVC) sets. The catheter part numbers are organized into
variant categories. These devices are distributed as procedure
trays, in various configurations inclusive of accessories and
adjunctive devices (see section "Accessories intended for use in
combination with the Device").
Variant Devices:
Variant Devices:
| Variant Description |
Part Number(s) |
Explanation of Multiple Part Numbers |
| 5F x 55cm Double Lumen Pro-Line |
10667-955-801 10669-955-801 |
No significant clinical, biological, or technical difference
(only difference is relative position of cuff)
|
| 5F x 60cm Single Lumen Pro-Line |
10570-960-801 10606-960-801 |
No significant clinical, biological, or technical difference
(only difference is relative position of cuff)
|
| 6F x 60cm Double Lumen Pro-Line |
10573-960-801 10608-960-801 |
No significant clinical, biological, or technical difference
(only difference is relative position of cuff)
|
| 6F x 60cm Single Lumen Pro-Line |
10571-960-801 10607-960-801 |
No significant clinical, biological, or technical difference
(only difference is relative position of cuff)
|
| 6F x 60cm Triple Lumen Pro-Line |
10575-960-801 |
N/A |
| 7F x 60cm Double Lumen Pro-Line |
10290-860-801 |
N/A |
| 7F x 60cm Single Lumen Pro-Line |
10289-860-801 |
N/A |
Variant Devices:
| Variant Description |
Part Number(s) |
Explanation of Multiple Part Numbers |
Procedure Trays:
Procedure Trays:
| Catalog Code |
Part Number |
Description |
| MR28035201 |
10667-955-801 |
5F X 55CM PRO-LINE® POWER INJECTABLE CENTRAL VENOUS CATHETER
DUAL LUMEN BASIC SET
|
| MR28035221 |
10669-955-801 |
5F X 55CM PRO-LINE® POWER INJECTABLE CENTRAL VENOUS CATHETER
DUAL LUMEN BASIC SET
|
| MR28036201 |
10573-960-801 |
6F X 60CM PRO-LINE® POWER INJECTABLE CENTRAL VENOUS CATHETER
DUAL LUMEN BASIC SET
|
| MR28036221 |
10608-960-801 |
6F X 60CM PRO-LINE® POWER INJECTABLE CENTRAL VENOUS CATHETER
DUAL LUMEN BASIC SET
|
| MR28037201 |
10290-860-801 |
7F X 60CM PRO-LINE® POWER INJECTABLE CENTRAL VENOUS CATHETER
DUAL LUMEN BASIC SET
|
| MR28035101 |
10570-960-801 |
5F X 60CM PRO-LINE® POWER INJECTABLE CENTRAL VENOUS CATHETER
SINGLE LUMEN BASIC SET
|
| MR28035121 |
10606-960-801 |
5F X 60CM PRO-LINE® POWER INJECTABLE CENTRAL VENOUS CATHETER
SINGLE LUMEN BASIC SET
|
| MR28036101 |
10571-960-801 |
6F X 60CM PRO-LINE® POWER INJECTABLE CENTRAL VENOUS CATHETER
SINGLE LUMEN BASIC SET
|
| MR28036121 |
10607-960-801 |
6F X 60CM PRO-LINE® POWER INJECTABLE CENTRAL VENOUS CATHETER
SINGLE LUMEN BASIC SET
|
| MR28037101 |
10289-860-801 |
7F X 60CM PRO-LINE® POWER INJECTABLE CENTRAL VENOUS CATHETER
SINGLE LUMEN BASIC SET
|
| MR28036301 |
10575-960-801 |
6F X 60CM PRO-LINE® POWER INJECTABLE CENTRAL VENOUS CATHETER
TRIPLE LUMEN BASIC SET
|
Procedure Trays:
| Catalog Code |
Part Number |
Description |
Configurations of Procedure Trays:
| Configuration Type |
Kit Components |
| Basic Set |
(1) Catheter w/ Stylet, (1) Peelable Introducer
|
2. Intended Use of the Device
Intended Purpose: The Pro-Line® Power Injectable
Central Venous Catheters are intended for use in adult patients
requiring frequent needlesticks for whom short-term or long-term
access to the central venous system without requiring frequent
needlesticks is deemed necessary based on the direction of a
qualified, licensed physician. The device is intended to be used
under the regular review and assessment of qualified health
professionals. This catheter is for Single Use Only.
Indication(s): The Pro-Line® Power Injectable
Central Venous Catheter is indicated for short-term or long-term
access to the central venous system for intravenous administration
of fluids or medications and power injection of contrast media.
Target Population(s): Pro-Line® Power Injectable
Central Venous Catheters are intended for use in adult patients
requiring frequent needlesticks for whom short- term or long-term
access to the central venous system without requiring frequent
needlesticks is deemed necessary based on the direction of a
qualified, licensed physician. The device is not intended for use
in pediatric patients.
Contraindications and/or Limitations:
-
The presence of device related infection, bacteremia or
septicemia is known or suspected.
-
This catheter is intended for short- or long-term vascular
access and should not be used for any purpose other than
indicated in these instructions.
-
The patient is known or is suspected to be allergic to materials
contained in the device.
3. Device Description
Device Name: Pro-Line® Power Injectable Central
Venous Catheters
Description of Device: The Pro-Line® Power
Injectable Central Venous Catheters are made from specially
formulated biocompatible medical grade materials and are available
in a variety of lumen configurations and sizes to accommodate
clinical needs. They are packaged in a tray with accessories
necessary for percutaneous insertion using a microintroducer
(Modified Seldinger or Seldinger technique). The maximum
recommended infusion rate is 5cc/sec. The maximum pressure of
power injectors used with the Pro-Line® Power Injectable CVC may
not exceed 300psi.
Device Name: Pro-Line® Power Injectable Central
Venous Catheters
Description of Device: The Pro-Line® Power
Injectable Central Venous Catheters are made from specially
formulated biocompatible medical grade materials and are available
in a variety of lumen configurations and sizes to accommodate
clinical needs. They are packaged in a tray with accessories
necessary for percutaneous insertion using a microintroducer
(Modified Seldinger or Seldinger technique). The maximum
recommended infusion rate is 5cc/sec. The maximum pressure of
power injectors used with the Pro-Line® Power Injectable CVC may
not exceed 300psi.
Materials / Substances in Contact with Patient Tissue:
The percentage ranges in the table below are based on the weight
of the 5F Single Lumen (3.64g) and 6F Triple Lumen (7.76g)
Pro-Line® devices.
Material
| Material |
% Weight (w/w) |
| Polyurethane |
29.24 - 63.56 |
| Polyvinyl Chloride |
0-30.44 |
| Acetal Co-polymer |
15.55 - 23.44 |
| Barium Sulfate |
5.96 - 12.56 |
| Acrylonitrile Butadiene Styrene |
6.73- 10.15 |
| Polyethylene Terephthalate |
0.43 - 2.47 |
The percentage ranges in the table below are based on the weight
of the 5F Single Lumen (3.64g) and 6F Triple Lumen (7.76g)
Pro-Line® devices.
Material
| Material |
% Weight (w/w) |
| Polyurethane |
29.24 - 63.56 |
| Polyvinyl Chloride |
0-30.44 |
| Acetal Co-polymer |
15.55 - 23.44 |
| Barium Sulfate |
5.96 - 12.56 |
| Acrylonitrile Butadiene Styrene |
6.73- 10.15 |
| Polyethylene Terephthalate |
0.43 - 2.47 |
Note:Accessories containing stainless steel may contain up to 0.4%
weight of the CMR substance cobalt.
Note:Per the instructions for use, the device is contraindicated
for patients with known or suspected allergies to the above
materials.
Information on Medicinal Substances in the Device:
How the Device Achieves its Intended Mode of Action:
The subject device can be inserted using a standard or modified
Seldinger percutaneous surgical technique. Catheter insertion is
to be done using aseptic techniques in a sterile field, preferably
in an operating room. Once in place, the CVC can be connected to a
gravity-feed intravenous (IV) bag, or connected to a pump, for
administration of fluids and medications. Catheter care includes
use of a locking solution to maintain catheter function. Catheter
removal is a surgical procedure intended to be performed by a
physician familiar with the appropriate techniques.
Sterilization Information: Contents sterile and
non-pyrogenic in unopened, undamaged package. Sterilized by
Ethylene Oxide.
Previous Generations / Variants:
| Name of Previous Generation |
Differences from Current Device |
| N/A |
N/A |
Accessories Intended for Use in Combination with the
Device:
| Name of Accessory |
Description of Accessory |
| 30415-018-070 |
0.47mm x 70cm (.018) Coated Guidewire Floppy Straight Tip
|
| 10129 |
0.76mm (0.030”) I.D. Adaptor w/Sideport
|
| 30205-210 |
0.9mm OD x 0.5mm ID x 70mm (21GA) Needle W/Echo Tip
|
| 30824 |
Securement Device |
| 30479 |
Scalpel |
| 5663 |
Tunneler |
| 5663-1 |
Tunneler |
| 5690 |
Tunneler |
| 5690-1 |
Tunneler |
| 5659 |
Tunneler |
| 5659-1 |
Tunneler |
| 30198-075 |
Stylet |
| 10700-10-055 |
1.8mm ID x 10cm (5.5F) Peelable Introducer
|
| 10590-10-060 |
1.9mm ID x 10cm (6F) Peelable Introducer
|
| 10590-10-065 |
2.0mm ID x 10cm (6.5F) Peelable Introducer
|
| 10590-10-070 |
2.2mm ID x 10cm (7F) Peelable Introducer
|
| 3035 |
Syringe |
| 3418 |
Tape Measure |
| 30823 |
Needleless Connector |
Other Devices or Products Intended for Use in Combination with
the Device:
| Name of Device or Product |
Description of Device or Product |
| N/A |
N/A |
4. Risks and Warnings
Residual Risks and Undesirable Effects: As per
product IFUs, All surgical procedures carry risk. Medcomp has
implemented risk management processes to proactively find and
mitigate these risks as far as possible without adversely
affecting the benefit-risk profile of the device. After
mitigation, residual risks and the possibility of adverse events
from use of this product remain. Medcomp has determined that all
residual risks are acceptable.
| Residual Harm Type |
Possible Adverse Events Associated with Harm
|
| Allergic Reaction |
Allergic Reaction
Intolerance Reaction to Implanted Device
|
| Bleeding |
Bleeding
Hematoma
|
| Cardiac Event |
Cardiac Arrythmia
Cardiac Tamponade
Myocardial Erosion
|
| Embolism |
Air Embolism
Thromboembolism
Catheter Embolism
|
| Infection |
Catheter Occlusion
Catheter Related Sepsis
Endocarditis
Exit Site Infection
Phlebitis
|
| Perforation |
Perforation of Vessels or Viscus
Vessel Erosion
Laceration of the Vessels
|
| Stenosis |
Venous Stenosis
|
| Tissue Injury |
Brachial Plexus Injury
Exit Site Necrosis
Soft Tissue Injury
|
| Thrombosis |
Venous Thrombosis
Ventricular Thrombosis
Fibrin Sheath Formation
|
| Miscellaneous complications |
Catheter Erosion Through Skin
Spontaneous Catheter Tip
Malposition or Retraction
Risks Normally Associated with
Local or General Anesthesia,
Surgery and Post-Operative
Recovery
|
|
Quantification of Residual Risks
|
|
PMS Complaints (01 January 2019 – 31 August 2024)
|
PMCF Events |
|
Units Sold: 80,809 |
Units Studied: 749 |
|
Patient Residual Harm Category
|
% of Devices |
% of Devices |
| Allergic Reaction |
Not Reported |
Not Reported |
| Bleeding |
Not Reported |
Not Reported |
| Cardiac Event |
Not Reported |
Not Reported |
| Embolism |
Not Reported |
Not Reported |
| Infection |
0.0012% |
12.82% |
| Perforation |
Not Reported |
Not Reported |
| Stenosis |
Not Reported |
Not Reported |
| Tissue Injury |
Not Reported |
Not Reported |
| Thrombosis |
Not Reported |
0.67% |
Warnings and Precautions:
All warnings have been reviewed against the risk analysis, PMS,
and usability testing to validate consistency between the sources
of information. The devices in scope of this clinical evaluation
have the following warnings in the IFUs:
-
Do not insert catheter in thrombosed vessels.
-
Do not advance the guidewire or catheter if unusual resistance
is encountered.
-
Do not insert or withdraw the guidewire forcibly from any
component. If the guidewire becomes damaged, guidewire and any
associated componentry must be removed together.
-
Do not pull tunneler off of catheter. Use scalpel to sever
catheter from tunneler.
-
Do not resterilize the catheter or accessories by any method.
Contents sterile and non-pyrogenic in unopened, undamaged
package. STERILIZED BY ETHYLENE OXIDE
-
Do not re-use catheter or accessories as there may be a failure
to adequately clean and decontaminate the device which may lead
to contamination, catheter degradation, device fatigue, or
endotoxin reaction.
-
Do not use catheter or accessories if package is opened or
damaged.
-
Do not use catheter or accessories if any sign of product damage
is visible or the use-by date has passed.
-
Do not use sharp instruments near the extension lines or
catheter lumen.
-
Do not use scissors to remove dressing. Precautions listed in
the IFUs are as follows:
-
Syringes smaller than ten (10) ml will generate excessive
pressure and may damage the catheter. Ten (10) ml or larger
syringes are recommended.
- Hydrate guidewire prior to use.
-
Always flush catheter prior to removing stylet.
-
Catheter will be damaged if clamps other than what is provided
with this kit are used.
-
Clamping of the tubing repeatedly in the same location may
weaken tubing. Avoid clamping near the luer(s) and hub of the
catheter.
-
Examine catheter lumen and extension(s) before and after each
infusion for damage.
-
To prevent accidents, assure the security of all caps and
connections prior to and between uses.
-
Use only Luer Lock (threaded) Connectors with this catheter.
-
In the rare event that a hub or connector separates from any
component during insertion or use, take all necessary steps and
precautions to prevent blood loss or air embolism.
-
Repeated overtightening of bloodlines, syringes, and caps will
reduce connector life and could lead to potential connector
failure.
-
Confirm catheter tip position by x-ray prior to use. Monitor tip
placement routinely per institution policy.
-
Discard biohazard according to facility protocol.
-
This is not a right atrium catheter. Avoid positioning the
catheter tip in the right atrium. Placement or migration of the
catheter tip into the right atrium may cause cardiac arrhythmia,
myocardia erosion, or cardiac tamponade.
-
Refer to standards of practice and institutional policies for
compatible infusion agents for central venous access.
-
Follow all contraindications, warnings, precautions, and
instructions for all infusates as specified by their
manufacturer.
Other Relevant Aspects of Safety: For a period of
01 January 2019 to 31 August 2024 there were 47 complaints for
80,809 units sold, giving an overall complaint rate of 0.058%.
There were no death-related events. No events resulted in recalls
during the review period.
5. Summary of Clinical Evaluation and Post-Market Clinical
Follow-Up (PMCF)
Summary of Clinical Data Related to Subject Device
Specific Case Numbers (Mixed Cohort Case Numbers) Identified and
Used for Clinical Performance Evaluation
| Product Family |
Clinical Literature |
PMCF Data |
Total Cases |
User Survey Responses |
| Clinical Literature |
54 |
751 |
805 |
14 |
Clinical performance was measured using parameters including but
not limited to dwell time, catheter insertion outcomes, and
adverse event rates. Critical clinical parameters extracted from
these studies met standards set forth in the guidelines for the
State of the Art. There were no unforeseen adverse events or other
high occurrences of adverse events detected in any of the clinical
activities. Survivability of a given implant is a multi-factorial
event that depends on numerous factors, including: the limits of
the implant, surgical technique, difficulty level of the surgical
procedure, patient health, patient activity level, patient medical
history, and other factors. In the case of the Pro-Line® Power
Injectable Central Venous Catheter, 738 catheters had a 95.42 day
[95%CI: 83.66 – 107.18 days] duration of use that has been found
in clinical use reported to date. Based on this information, the
Pro-Line® Power Injectable Central Venous Catheter has a 12 month
lifetime; however, the decision to remove and/or replace the
catheter should be based on clinical performance and need, and not
any predetermined point in time.
Summary of Clinical Data Related to the Equivalent Device
Clinical evidence from published literature and PMCF activities
has been generated specific to known and unknown variants of the
subject device. The equivalency rationale in the updated clinical
evaluation report will demonstrate that the clinical evidence
available for these variants is representative of the range of
device variants in the device family. There are no clinical or
biological differences between variants within the subject device
family, and the potential impact of the technical differences will
be rationalized in the updated clinical evaluation report.
Summary of Clinical Data from Pre-Market Investigations (if
applicable)
No pre-market clinical investigations were used for the device's
clinical evaluation.
Summary of Clinical Data from Other Sources
Source:Summary of Published Literature
Clinical evidence literature searches have found three published
literature articles representing 54 cases specific to the
Pro-Line® device family. The articles included one randomized
controlled trial (Yong et al.), one prospective study (Kehagias et
al.), and a case study (Highnell et al.). Bibliography: Hignell,
E. R., & Phelps, J. (2020). Recurrent central venous catheter
migration in a patient with brittle asthma. The journal of
vascular access, 21(4), 533-535. Kehagias, E., & Tsetis, D.
(2019). The “Arm-to-Chest Tunneling” technique: A modified
technique for arm placement of implantable ports or central
catheters. The journal of vascular access, 20(6), 771-777. Sze
Yong T, Vijayanathan AA, Chung E, Ng WL, Yaakup NA, Sulaiman N.
Comparing catheter related bloodstream infection rate between
cuffed tunnelled and non-cuffed tunnelled peripherally inserted
central catheter. J Vasc Access. 2022;23(2):225-31.
• Source:PMCF_Infusion_201
The CVAD Registry was acquired from CVAD Resources, LLC on 23
August 2020. All data received was de-identified, but otherwise
represented exactly what was entered by clinicians on a
consecutive basis. Medcomp received only data pertaining to
devices with the manufacturer listed as “Medcomp" and all case
information was sourced from two US hospitals. Hospital ID 121 is
described as a “Vascular Access team in a Not-for-Profit Community
Based Hospital”, and Hospital ID 123 is described as a “PICC
(peripherally inserted central catheter) team in an Academic
Medical Center”. Insertion of device dates range from 06 August
2012 through 21 April 2015. Removal of device dates from 09 August
2012 through 07 May 2015. 2 Pro-Line® cases, described as 5F and
double lumen, were collected. The following outcome measure was
confirmed to be within State of the Art safety and performance
outcome measures from published literature for Medcomp Pro-Line®
devices:
Procedural Outcomes – 100%
• Source:PMCF_Infusion_211
The Infusion Product Line Data Collection Survey aimed to assess
safety and performance outcome information for all variants of
Medcomp Infusion Ports, PICCs, Midlines, and CVCs. 70 survey
responses were collected from 17 countries representing 471 device
cases. 8 Pro-Line® cases inclusive of several variant devices
across French size (5F and 7F) and lumen configuration (single and
dual) were collected. The following outcome measures were
confirmed to be within State of the Art safety and performance
outcome measures from published literature for Medcomp Pro-Line®
devices:
Dwell Time – 247.6 Days (95%CI: 236.07 – 259.13)
Procedural Outcomes – 100%
Catheter Associated Venous Thrombus – No Events Reported
Catheter Related Blood Stream Infection – No Events Reported
Power Injection Related Complications – No Events Reported The
variants included in the dataset are displayed below. Variant n
French Size(s) Length(s) Single Lumen Pro-Line 5 5F 60cm Dual
Lumen Pro-Line 3 7F 60cm
Source:Duration of Use Customer Survey
An email questionnaire was distributed globally to users of
Medcomp PICCs and CVCs from 10 October 2019 to 16 October 2019.
The questionnaire asked respondents to identify, from their own
experience, the number of products used yearly, the average dwell
time, and the longest dwell time for each applicable device
family. Across the five device families, a total of 69 responses
were collected from 14 countries. Means and ranges of responses
for each device family were compiled on 16 October 2019. 7
responses were acquired relating to the Pro-Line® device family.
Across an estimated 580 products used yearly, the mean average
dwell time was 126.4 days (Range: 45 – 240 days), and the mean
longest dwell time was 405 days (Range: 235 – 547.5 days).
• Source:PMCF_Infusion_222
The University of Pittsburgh Medical Center (UPMC) Database
assessed safety and performance outcome information for Pro-Line®
and Vascu-Line® SL (referred to in the data set as “LT Silicone
CVC”) Medcomp Infusion CVCs. 825 of 1,028 cases (80.25%) are
directly from the University of Pittsburgh Medical Center
Presbyterian which the investigator notes may be a population
prone to infection and chronic illness. The remainder of the cases
are from other hospitals in the UPMC system which the investigator
notes may have a patient population more similar to a community
hospital. The multi-center approach aimed to be representative of
the broad spectrum of users within the user population. 739
Pro-Line® cases inclusive of several variant devices across French
size (5F and 6F) and lumen configuration (single, double, and
triple) were collected. The following outcome measures were
confirmed to be within State of the Art safety and performance
outcome measures from published literature for Medcomp Pro-Line®
devices:
Dwell Time – 95.42 Days (95%CI: 83.66 – 107.18)
Procedural Outcomes – 100%
Catheter Associated Venous Thrombus – 0.07 per 1,000 catheter days
(95%CI: 0.02 – 0.15)
Catheter Related Blood Stream Infection – 1.36 per 1,000 catheter
days (95%CI: 1.1 – 1.6)
Power Injection Related Complications – No Events Reported
• Source:PMCF_Infusion_231
The King Faisal Specialist Hospital & Research Center dataset
was finalized 22 March 2023. The full King Faisal Specialist
Hospital & Research Center dataset was acquired on 23 February
2023. The country of origin of the data set is Saudi Arabia. The
full dataset included information on 92 Vascu-Line®, 2 Pro-Line®,
and 1 Vascu-Line® SL cases with dates of insertion ranging from 22
December 2021 to 11 January 2023 and dates of removal (or last
known follow-up) ranging from 09 May 2022 to 23 February 2023.
Real-world performance data on the use of two Medcomp Pro-Line®
catheters was collected.
Dwell Time (94 days 95%CI: 0 – 1072.4 days)
Procedural Outcomes (100% 95%CI: 100% - 100%)
Catheter Related Blood Stream Infection (CRBSI) Rate (0 per 1,000
catheter days 95%CI: 0 – 19.6)
Catheter Associated Venous Thrombus (CAVT) Rate (0 per 1,000
catheter days 95%CI: 0 – 19.6)
• Source:PMCF_Medcomp_211
The Medcomp User Survey acquired responses from healthcare
personnel familiar with any number of Medcomp's product offerings.
11 respondents responded that they or their facility have used
Medcomp CVCs, with 7 of those respondents using the Pro-Line®
device. There were no differences in mean user sentiments within
CVCs across State of the Art Performance and Safety Outcome
Measures or between device types relating to safety or
performance. The following data points were collected from users
of Medcomp CVCs (n=11):
(Mean Likert Scale Response) Catheters function as intended – 4.6
/ 5
(Mean Likert Scale Response) Packaging allows for aseptic
presentation - 4.6 / 5
(Mean Likert Scale Response) Benefit outweighs the risk – 4.7 / 5
(n=10)
Dwell Time (n=6) – 20.33 days (95%CI: 4.27 – 36.4) The following
data points were collected from users of Medcomp Pro-Line® CVCs
(n=7):
(Mean Likert Scale Response) Catheters function as intended – 4.5
/ 5
(Mean Likert Scale Response) Packaging allows for aseptic
presentation – 4.5/5
(Mean Likert Scale Response) Benefit outweighs the risk – 4.6 / 5
(n=6)
Dwell Time (n=4) – 21.5 days (95%CI: 0 – 49.26) The following
complications were reported for Pro-Line® devices:
No Blood Return (3 out of 200 Cases)
Infection (No Comments on Frequency)
Overall Summary of Clinical Safety and Performance
Upon review of the data across all sources, it is possible to
conclude that the benefits of the subject device, which is
facilitating delivery of fluids and medications for treatments
including chemotherapy and power injection of contrast media for
CT examinations in patients in whom short-term or long-term access
to the central venous system without requiring frequent
needlesticks is deemed necessary based on the direction of a
qualified, licensed physician, outweigh the overall and individual
risks when the device is used as intended by the manufacturer. It
is the manufacturer's and clinical expert evaluator's opinion that
activities both complete and ongoing are sufficient to support the
safety, efficacy, and acceptable benefit/risk profile of the
subject devices.
Performance
| Outcome |
Benefit/Risk Acceptability Criteria |
Desired Trend |
Clinical Literature (Subject Device) |
PMCF Data (Subject Device) |
| Performance Outcomes |
| Dwell Time |
Greater than 55 days |
+
|
37.28 days (Summary of Published Literature)
|
247.6 days (PMCF_Infusion_211) 126.4 days (Duration of Use
Customer Survey) 95.42 Days (PMCF_Infusion_222) 94 Days
(PMCF_Infusion_231) 21.5 Days (PMCF_Medcomp_211) Likert
Scale Response 4.6/5 (PMCF_Medcomp_211)**
|
| Procedural Outcomes |
Greater than 92.0% |
+
|
ND*
|
100% (PMCF_Infusion_211) 100% (PMCF_Infusion_201) 100%
(PMCF_Infusion_222) 100% (PMCF_Infusion_231) Likert Scale
Response 4.6/5 (PMCF_Medcomp_211)**
|
| Safety Outcomes |
|
Catheter Associated Venous Thrombus (CAVT)
|
Less than 0.3 incidents of CAVT per 1,000 catheter days
|
-
|
1.1 per 1,000 catheter days (Summary of Published
Literature)
|
None Reported (PMCF_Infusion_211) 0.07 per 1,000 catheter
days (PMCF_Infusion_222) None Reported (PMCF_Infusion_231)
Likert Scale Response 4.6/5 (PMCF_Medcomp_211)**
|
|
Central Line Associated Blood Stream Infection (CLABSI) /
Catheter Related Blood Stream Infection (CRBSI)
|
Less than 5.0 incidents of CLABSI/CRBSI per 1,000 catheter
days
|
-
|
2.7 per 1,000 catheter days (Summary of Published
Literature)
|
None Reported (PMCF_Infusion_211) 1.36 per 1,000 catheter
days (PMCF_Infusion_222) None Reported (PMCF_Infusion_231)
Likert Scale Response 4.6/5 (PMCF_Medcomp_211)**
|
| Power Injection Related Complications |
Less than 1.8% catheters with reported incidents of rupture
due to contrast injection Less than 15.4% catheters with
reported incidents of displacement due to contrast injection
|
-
|
ND*
|
None Reported (PMCF_Infusion_211) None Reported
(PMCF_Infusion_222) None Reported (PMCF_Infusion_231) Likert
Scale Response 4.6/5 (PMCF_Medcomp_211)**
|
*ND indicates no data on the clinical data parameter:
**PMCF_Medcomp_211 asked respondents, if they agreed on a scale
of 1-5, that their experience in relation to each outcome was the
same or better than the benefit/risk acceptability criteria.:
On-going or planned Post-Market Clinical Follow-up (PMCF)
| Outcome |
Benefit/Risk Acceptability Criteria |
Desired Trend |
Clinical Literature (Subject Device) |
PMCF Data (Subject Device) |
| Performance Outcomes |
| Multicenter Patient-Level Case Series |
Collect additional clinical data on the device
|
PMCF_CVC_231
|
Q4 2025
|
|
| State of the Art Literature Search |
Identify risks and trends with use of similar devices
|
SAP-Infusion
|
Q2 2025
|
|
| Safety Outcomes |
| Clinical Evidence Literature Search |
Identify risks and trends with use of the device
|
LRP-Infusion
|
Q2 2025
|
|
| Global Trial Database Search |
Identify ongoing clinical trials involving Medcomp®
catheters
|
N/A
|
Q3 2025
|
|
|
Truveta Data Queries and Retrospective Analysis
|
Collect additional clinical data on the device and
comparators
|
TBD
|
Q4 2025
|
|
On-going or Planned Post-Market Clinical Follow-Up (PMCF)
| Activity |
Description |
Reference |
Timeline |
| Multicenter Patient-Level Case Series |
Collect additional clinical data on the device
|
PMCF_CVC_231 |
Q4 2025 |
| State of the Art Literature Search |
Identify risks and trends with use of similar devices
|
SAP-Infusion |
Q2 2025 |
| Clinical Evidence Literature Search |
Identify risks and trends with use of the device
|
LRP-Infusion |
Q2 2025 |
| Global Trial Database Search |
Identify ongoing clinical trials involving Medcomp®
catheters
|
N/A |
Q3 2025 |
|
Truveta Data Queries and Retrospective Analysis
|
Collect additional clinical data on the device and
comparators
|
TBD |
Q4 2025 |
No emerging risks, complications or unexpected device failures
have been detected from PMCF activities.
6. Possible Therapeutic Alternatives
The Infusion Nurses Society (INS) Standards 2021 clinical practice
guidelines have been used to support the below recommendations for
treatments.
| Therapy |
Benefits |
Disadvantages |
Key Risks |
| • Central Venous Catheters (CVCs) |
- Easy access once in place
- Minimizes repeated venipuncture
-
Increased patient mobility during infusion
- Easier for outpatient treatment
|
-
Requires surgical procedure for placement
- Risks associated with surgery
|
- general anesthesia, etc.
- Requires maintenance
-
High risk of infection or thrombotic event
|
| • Implantable Ports |
-
Decreases puncture wounds/vein damage compared to
traditional injection
-
Easier to visualize, palpate, and therefore safer form
of IV access
-
Reduces chance for corrosive medications to make skin
contact
-
Only one venipuncture for both treatment and lab draws,
as opposed to two for traditional IV
-
Longer dwelling time compared to IV
- Can be permanent, if needed
|
-
Requires surgical procedure, but IV does not
- Risks associated with surgery
|
- general anesthesia, etc.
- Requires regular flushing
|
| • Midline Catheters |
-
Patient comfort – fewer restarts than IVs
- Longer dwell time than IVs
-
Lower risk of infection compared to IVs
- No X-ray required before use
-
Decreased chance of extravasation of infusate
|
-
Data on clear disadvantages compared to other modalities
is not available
-
Not suitable for continuous injections of most vesicants
or irritants
|
- Insertion-related phlebitis
|
|
• Peripherally Inserted Central Catheters (PICCs)
|
-
Decreased risk of catheter occlusion compared to CVC
-
Fewer venous punctures compared to traditional PIV
|
-
Increased risk of deep vein thrombosis compared to CVC
- Pain/Discomfort over time
- Need for adaptation in daily life
|
- Deep vein thrombosis (DVT)
- Pulmonary embolism
- Venous thromboembolism (VTE)
- Post thrombotic syndrome
|
|
• Peripheral Intravenous Catheters (PIVs)
|
-
Does not require surgical procedure
|
-
Higher hemolysis rates compared to venipuncture
- Infection
- Hematoma/thrombosis
-
Cannot be used for therapies with blistering agents
- Four days maximum use
|
|
7. Suggested Profile and Training for Users
The catheter should be inserted, manipulated, and removed by a
qualified, licensed physician or other qualified health care
professional under the direction of a physician.
8. Reference to Any Harmonized Standards and Common Specifications
(CS) Applied
| Harmonized Standard or CS |
Revision |
Title or Description |
Level of Compliance |
| EN 556-1 |
2001 |
Sterilization of medical devices. Requirements for medical
devices to be designated "STERILE". Requirements for
terminally sterilized medical devices
|
Full |
| EN ISO 10555-1 |
2013+A1:2017 |
Intravascular catheters. Sterile and single- use catheters.
General requirements
|
Full |
| EN ISO 10555-3 |
2013 |
Intravascular catheters. Sterile and single- use catheters.
Central venous catheters
|
Full |
| EN ISO 10993-1 |
2020 |
Biological evaluation of medical devices Part 1: Evaluation
and testing within a risk management process
|
Full |
| EN ISO 10993-7 |
2008+ A1:2022 |
Biological evaluation of medical devices Part 7: Ethylene
oxide sterilization residuals - Amendment 1: Applicability
of allowable limits for neonates and infants
|
Full |
| EN ISO 10993-18 |
2020 |
Biological evaluation of medical devices Part 18: Chemical
characterization of medical device materials within a risk
management process
|
Full |
| EN ISO 11070 |
2014+A1:2018 |
Sterile single-use intravascular introducers, dilators and
guidewires
|
Full |
| EN ISO 11135 |
2014 + A1: 2019 |
Sterilization of health-care products. Ethylene oxide.
Requirements for the development, validation and routine
control of a sterilization process for medical devices
|
Full |
| EN ISO 11138-1 |
2017 |
Sterilization of health care products — Biological
indicators Part 1: General requirements
|
Full |
| EN ISO 11138-2 |
2017 |
Sterilization of health care products— Biological
indicators—Part 2: Biological indicators for ethylene oxide
sterilization processes
|
Full |
| EN ISO 11138-7 |
2019 |
Sterilization of health care products. Biological indicators
- Guidance for the selection, use and interpretation of
results
|
Full |
| EN ISO 11140-1 |
2014 |
Sterilization of health care products — Chemical indicators
Part 1: General requirements
|
Full |
| EN ISO 11607-1 Excludes Section 7 |
2020 |
Packaging for terminally sterilized medical devices.
Requirements for materials, sterile barrier systems and
packaging systems
|
Partial; (Transition Plan) |
| EN ISO 11607-2 |
2020 |
Packaging for terminally sterilized medical devices.
Validation requirements for forming, sealing and assembly
processes
|
Full |
| EN ISO 11737-1 |
2018+ A1: 2021 |
Sterilization of health care products. Microbiological
methods. Determination of a population of microorganisms on
products
|
Full |
| EN ISO 13485 |
2016 + A11: 2021 |
Medical Devices – Quality Management system - Requirements
for Regulatory Purposes
|
Full |
| EN ISO 14155 |
2020 |
Clinical investigation of medical devices for human subjects
— Good clinical practice
|
Full |
| EN ISO 14644-1 |
2015 |
Cleanrooms and associated controlled environments — Part 1:
Classification of air cleanliness by particle concentration
|
Full |
| EN ISO 14644-2 |
2015 |
Cleanrooms and associated controlled environments — Part 2:
Monitoring to provide evidence of cleanroom performance
related to air cleanliness by particle concentration
|
Full |
| EN ISO 14971 |
2019+A11:2021 |
Medical devices. Application of risk management to medical
devices
|
Full |
| EN ISO 15223-1 |
2021 |
Medical devices — Symbols to be used with medical device
labels, labelling and information to be supplied — Part 1:
General requirements
|
Full |
| EN ISO/IEC 17025 |
2017 |
General requirements for the competence of testing and
calibration laboratories
|
Full |
| PD CEN ISO/TR 20416 |
2020 |
Medical devices — post-market surveillance for manufacturers
|
Full |
| EN ISO 20417 |
2021 |
Medical devices - Information to be supplied by the
manufacturer.
|
Full |
| EN 62366-1 |
2015+ A1: 2020 |
Medical devices — Part 1: Application of usability
engineering to medical devices
|
Full |
| ISO 7000 |
2019 |
Graphical symbols for use on equipment. Registered symbols
|
Partial |
| ISO 594-1 |
1986 |
Conical fittings with a 6 % (Luer) taper for syringes,
needles and certain other medical equipment — Part 1:
General requirements
|
Full |
| ISO 594-2 |
1998 |
Conical fittings with a 6 % (Luer) taper for syringes,
needles and certain other medical equipment — Part 2: Lock
Fittings
|
Full |
| MEDDEV 2.7.1 |
Rev 4 |
Clinical Evaluation: A Guide for Manufacturers and Notified
Bodies Under Directives 93/42/EEC and 90/385/EEC
|
Full |
| MEDDEV 2.12/2 |
Rev. 2 |
GUIDELINES ON MEDICAL DEVICES POST MARKET CLINICAL FOLLOW-UP
STUDIES A GUIDE FOR MANUFACTURERS AND NOTIFIED BODIES
|
Full |
| MDCG 2020-6 |
2020 |
Clinical evidence needed for medical devices previously CE
marked under Directives 93/42/EEC or 90/385/EEC
|
Full |
| MDCG 2020-7 |
2020 |
Post-market clinical follow-up (PMCF) Plan Template A guide
for manufacturers and notified bodies
|
Full |
| MDCG 2020-8 |
2020 |
Post-market clinical follow-up (PMCF) Evaluation Report
Template A guide for manufacturers and notified bodies
|
Full |
| MDCG 2019-9 |
2022 |
Summary of safety and clinical performance
|
Full |
| MDCG 2018-1 |
Rev. 4 |
Guidance on BASIC UDI-DI and changes to UDI-DI
|
Full |
| ASTM D 4169-16 |
2022 |
Standard Practices for Performance Testing of Shipping
Containers and Systems.
|
Full |
| ASTM F2096-11 |
2019 |
Standard Test Method for Detecting Gross Leaks in Packaging
by Internal Pressurization (Bubble Test)
|
Full |
| ASTM F2503-20 |
2020 |
Standard Practice for Marking Medical Devices and Other
Items for Safety in the Magnetic Resonance Environment
|
Full |
| ASTM F640-20 |
2020 |
Standard Test Methods for determining Radiopacity for
Medical Use
|
Full |
| ASTM D4332-14 |
2014 |
Standard Practice for Conditioning Containers, Packages, or
Packaging Components for Testing
|
Full |
Revision History
| Revision |
Date |
CR# |
Author |
Description of Changes |
Validated |
| 1 |
26APR2022 |
26921 |
RS |
Implementation of SSCP |
No, this version was not validated by the Notified Body as
this is a Class IIa or IIb implantable device
|
| 2 |
17JUN2022 |
27027 |
RS |
Scheduled Update |
No, this version was not validated by the Notified Body as
this is a Class IIa or IIb implantable device
|
| 3 |
23NOV2022 |
27509 |
GM |
Scheduled Update; updated SSCP in accordance with CER-017_C
and QA-CL-200- 1 Version 3.00 Template. Acronym table was
added in Section 7 of the Patient Section.
|
No, this version was not validated by the Notified Body as
this is a Class IIa or IIb implantable device
|
| 4 |
03APR2023 |
28001 |
GM |
Clean Copy of SSCP after Clinical Q&A; Addition of
Planned PMCF Activity PMCF_CVC_231
|
No, this version was not validated by the Notified Body as
this is a Class IIa or IIb implantable device
|
| 5 |
20OCT2023 |
28545 |
GM |
Updated in accordance with CER-017_D |
No, this version was not validated by the Notified Body as
this is a Class IIa or IIb implantable device
|
| 6 |
22OCT2024 |
29484 |
GM |
Updated in accordance with CER-017_E |
No, this version was not validated by the Notified Body as
this is a Class IIa or IIb implantable device
|