Important Information
This Summary of Safety and Clinical Performance (SSCP) is intended
to provide public access to an updated summary of the main aspects
of the safety and clinical performance of the device. This SSCP is
not intended to replace the Instructions for Use as the main
document to ensure the safe use of the device, nor is it intended
to provide diagnostic or therapeutic suggestions to intended users
or patients.
Applicable Documents
| Document Type |
Document Title / Number |
| Design History File (DHF) |
6002 |
| ‘MDR Documentation’ File Number |
MDR-011 |
1. Device Identification and General Information
Device Trade Name(s): Canaud Catheters
Manufacturer Name and Address: Medical
Components, Inc. 1499 Delp Drive Harleysville, PA 19438 USA
Manufacturer Single Registration Number (SRN):
US-MF-000008230
Basic UDI-DI: 00884908283NH
Medical Device Nomenclature: F900202 – Permanent
Hemodialysis Catheter and Kits
Class of Device: III
Date First CE Certificate Issued: Nov-93
Authorized Representative Name and SRN: European
Regulatory Expert Medical Product Service GmbH (MPS) Borngasse 20
35619 Braunfels, Germany SRN: DE-AR-000005009
Notified Body Name and Single Identification Number:
BSI Netherlands NB2797
Device Grouping and Variants
The devices in scope of this document are all long-term
hemodialysis catheter sets. The device part numbers are organized
into variant categories. These devices are distributed as
procedure trays, in various configurations inclusive of
accessories and adjunctive devices (see section “Accessories
intended for use in combination with the Device”).
Variant Devices:
Variant Devices:
| Variant Description |
Part Number(s) |
Explanation of Multiple Part Numbers |
| 10F x 40cm Canaud |
3320 |
|
Variant Devices:
| Variant Description |
Part Number(s) |
Explanation of Multiple Part Numbers |
| 10F x 40cm Canaud |
3320 |
|
Procedure Trays:
Procedure Trays:
| Catalog Code |
Part Number |
Description |
| MCCA1040K-A |
3320 |
10F x 40cm Canaud Catheter Set |
| MCCA1040S-A |
3320 |
10F x 40cm Single Canaud Catheter Set |
| MCCC1040K-A |
3320 |
10F x 40cm Canaud Catheter w/ Stiffening Stylet Set
|
| MCCC1040S-A |
3320 |
10F x 40cm Single Canaud Catheter w/ Stiffening Stylet Set
|
Procedure Trays:
| Catalog Code |
Part Number |
Description |
| MCCA1040K-A |
3320 |
10F x 40cm Canaud Catheter Set |
| MCCA1040S-A |
3320 |
10F x 40cm Single Canaud Catheter Set |
| MCCC1040K-A |
3320 |
10F x 40cm Canaud Catheter w/ Stiffening Stylet Set
|
| MCCC1040S-A |
3320 |
10F x 40cm Single Canaud Catheter w/ Stiffening Stylet Set
|
Configurations of Procedure Trays:
| Configuration Type |
Kit Components |
|
Canaud Dual Hemodialysis Dual Catheter Set
|
(2) Catheter |
|
10F x 40cm Canaud Single Lumen Hemodialysis Single Catheter
Set
|
(1) Catheter |
|
10F x 40cm Canaud Single Lumen Hemodialysis Dual Catheter w/
Stiffening Stylet Set
|
(2) Catheter |
|
10F x 40cm Canaud Single Lumen Hemodialysis Single Catheter
w/ Stiffening Stylet Set
|
(1) Catheter |
2. Intended Use of the Device
Intended Purpose: As per product IFU (IFU
40777-1BSI), Canaud Catheters are intended for use in adult
patients who do not have functional permanent vascular access or
are not candidates for permanent vascular access for whom central
venous vascular access for hemodialysis is deemed necessary based
on the direction of a qualified, licensed physician. The catheter
is intended to be used under the regular review and assessment of
qualified health professionals. The catheter is single use only.
Indication(s): As per product IFU (IFU
40777-1BSI), the Canaud Catheters are indicated for short-term or
long-term use where vascular access is required for 14 days or
more for the purpose of hemodialysis.
Target Population(s): Canaud Catheters are
intended for use in adult patients who do not have functional
permanent vascular access or are not candidates for permanent
vascular access for whom central venous vascular access for
hemodialysis is deemed necessary based on the direction of a
qualified, licensed physician. The catheter is not intended for
use in pediatric patients.
Contraindications and/or Limitations:
-
As per product IFU (IFU 40777-1BSI), the Canaud catheters are
contraindicated as follows:
-
Known or suspected allergies to any of the components of the
catheter or the kit.
-
This device is contraindicated for patients exhibiting severe,
uncontrolled coagulopathy or thrombocytopenia.
3. Device Description
Device Name: Canaud Catheters
Description of Device: The Canaud Catheter is a
long-term single lumen catheter. Two catheters are inserted into
the target vein that are used to remove and return blood through
two separate passages (lumens). The subcutaneous portion of the
adapter has a barbed stem for attachment to the subcutaneous
lumen. A suture, attached to each adapter, is used to anchor the
catheter within the tunnel. The catheter incorporates Barium
Sulphate to facilitate visualization under fluoroscopy or Xray.
The catheter has been tested at flow rates of up to 500 mL/min.
Device Name: Canaud Catheters
Description of Device: The Canaud Catheter is a
long-term single lumen catheter. Two catheters are inserted into
the target vein that are used to remove and return blood through
two separate passages (lumens). The subcutaneous portion of the
adapter has a barbed stem for attachment to the subcutaneous
lumen. A suture, attached to each adapter, is used to anchor the
catheter within the tunnel. The catheter incorporates Barium
Sulphate to facilitate visualization under fluoroscopy or Xray.
The catheter has been tested at flow rates of up to 500 mL/min.
Materials / Substances in Contact with Patient Tissue:
The percentages below are based on the weight of the Canaud
catheter (7.415g).
Materials / substances in contact with patient tissue
| Material |
% Weight (w/w) |
| Polyurethane |
32.83 |
| Acetal copolymer |
18.51 |
| Silicone |
35.86 |
| Nylon |
6.47 |
| Barium sulfate |
6.33 |
The percentages below are based on the weight of the Canaud
catheter (7.415g).
Materials / substances in contact with patient tissue
| Material |
% Weight (w/w) |
| Polyurethane |
32.83 |
| Acetal copolymer |
18.51 |
| Silicone |
35.86 |
| Nylon |
6.47 |
| Barium sulfate |
6.33 |
Note:Per the instructions for use, the device is contraindicated
for patients with known or suspected allergies to the above
materials.
Note:Accessories containing stainless steel may contain up to 4%
weight of the CMR substance cobalt.
Information on Medicinal Substances in the Device:
How the Device Achieves its Intended Mode of Action:
Hemodialysis catheters are centrally placed access tubes. A
typical hemodialysis catheter uses a thin, flexible tube. This
catheter has two separate tubes. The tubes go into a large vein.
The vein is usually the internal jugular vein. Blood withdraws
through one tube of the catheter. The blood flows to the dialysis
machine through a separate tubing set. The blood is then processed
and filtered. The blood returns to the patient through the second
tube. This device is used when dialysis must start at once.
Patients may not have a functioning AV fistula or graft. Catheter
hemodialysis normally happens on a short-term basis. Long-term
access may occur in some cases. For example, when there are
problems supporting an AV fistula or graft.
Sterilization Information: Contents sterile and
non-pyrogenic in unopened, undamaged package. Sterilized by
Ethylene Oxide.
Previous Generations / Variants:
| Name of Previous Generation |
Differences from Current Device |
| • TwinCath, DualCath |
• Prior to the date of CE marking, a similarly named device
was marketed by Vygon (Lansdale, PA). • Between 1996 and
1998, the text “Tesio” was printed on the device.
|
Accessories Intended for Use in Combination with the
Device:
| Name of Accessory |
Description of Accessory |
| Guidewire |
For general intravascular use to facilitate the selective
placement of medical devices in the vessel anatomy.
|
| Introducer Needle |
Used for the percutaneous introduction of guidewires.
|
| Stylet |
Assist in catheter insertion |
| Plug |
To block the catheter lumen and prevent blood loss after
insertion and before the adaptor is attached
|
| Stiffener Stylet |
Assist in extension insertion |
| Tunneler |
Instrument used to create a subcutaneous tunnel
|
| Advancer |
Aid for introduction of guidewire into target vein.
|
| Attachable Suture Wing |
The removable suture wing is intended to provide additional
catheter securement and to minimize movement at the exit
site.
|
| 2.0 Suture |
Securement of a catheter to the body Silk black braided,
sterile non-absorbable suture
|
| Dilator |
Designed for percutaneous entry into a vessel in order to
enlarge the opening of the vessel for the placement of a
catheter in a vein.
|
| End Cap |
To keep clean and protect catheter luer between treatments.
|
Other Devices or Products Intended for Use in Combination with
the Device:
| Name of Device or Product |
Description of Device or Product |
| N/A |
N/A |
4. Risks and Warnings
Residual Risks and Undesirable Effects: All
surgical procedures carry risk. Medcomp has implemented risk
management processes to proactively find and mitigate these risks
as far as possible without adversely affecting the benefit-risk
profile of the device. After mitigation, residual risks and the
possibility of adverse events from use of this product remain.
Medcomp has determined that all residual risks are acceptable.
| Residual Harm Type |
Possible Adverse Events Associated with Harm
|
| Bleeding |
Bleeding (May be severe)
|
| Cardiac Event |
Cardiac Arrhythmia
|
| Embolism |
Air Embolus
|
| Infection |
Bacteremia
|
| Perforation |
Inferior Vena Cava Puncture
|
| Thrombosis |
Central Venous Thrombosis
|
| Miscellaneous Complications |
Brachial Plexus Injury
|
|
Quantification of Residual Risks
|
|
PMS Complaints 01 January 2016 – 31 March 2025
|
PMCF Events |
|
Units Sold: 30,881 |
Units Studied: 1,028 |
|
Patient Residual Harm Category
|
% of Devices |
% of Devices |
| Allergic Reaction |
Not Reported |
Not Reported |
| Bleeding |
0.06% |
1.26% |
| Cardiac Event |
0.003% |
Not Reported |
| Embolism |
0.01% |
Not Reported |
| Infection |
Not Reported |
17.02% |
| Perforation |
Not Reported |
Not Reported |
| Stenosis |
Not Reported |
0.39% |
| Tissue Injury |
Not Reported |
Not Reported |
| Thrombosis |
Not Reported |
1.65% |
| Miscellaneous Complications |
Not Reported |
Not Reported |
Warnings and Precautions:
All warnings have been reviewed against the risk analysis, PMS,
and usability testing to validate consistency between the sources
of information.
-
Do not insert catheter in thrombosed vessels.
-
Do not advance the guidewire or catheter if unusual resistance
is encountered.
-
Do not not insert or withdraw the guidewire forcibly from any
component. If the guidewire becomes damaged, guidewire and any
associated componentry must be removed together.
-
Do not resterilize the catheter or accessories by any method.
-
Contents sterile and non-pyrogenic in unopened, undamaged
package. STERILIZED BY ETHYLENE OXIDE
-
Do not re-use catheter or accessories as there may be a failure
to adequately clean and decontaminate the device which may lead
to contamination, catheter degradation, device fatigue, or
endotoxin reaction.
-
Do not use catheter or accessories if package is opened or
damaged.
-
Do not use catheter or accessories if any sign of product damage
is visible or the use-by date has passed.
-
Do not use sharp instruments near the extension tubing or
catheter lumen.
- Do not use scissors to remove dressing.
-
Do not use iodine products for site care with this silicone
catheter. Precautions listed in the Canaud Catheters IFU are as
follows:
-
Examine catheter lumen and extensions before and after each
treatment for damage.
-
To prevent accidents, assure the security of all caps and
bloodline connections prior to and between treatments.
-
Use only Luer Lock (threaded) Connectors with this catheter.
-
In the rare event that a hub or connector separates from any
component during insertion or use, take all necessary steps and
precautions to prevent blood loss or air embolism and remove
catheter.
-
Before attempting catheter insertion, ensure that you are
familiar with the potential complications and their emergency
treatment should any of them occur.
-
Repeated overtightening of bloodlines, syringes, and caps will
reduce connector life and could lead to potential connector
failure.
-
The catheter will be damaged if clamps other than what is
provided with this kit are used.
-
Avoid clamping near the Luer Lock and hub of the catheter.
Clamping of the tubing repeatedly in the same location may
weaken tubing.
-
Use only Medcomp® Canuad Adapters with this catheter. When
cutting catheter to desired length, assure the lumen is cut
square and that the remaining catheter lumen is not damaged.
Additional warnings and cautions listed in the Canaud Catheter
IFUs are as follows:
-
Physician discretion is strongly advised when inserting this
catheter in patients who are unable to take or hold a deep
breath.
-
Patients requiring ventilator support are at increased risk of
pneumothorax during subclavian vein cannulation, which may cause
complications.
-
Extended use of the subclavian vein may be associated with
subclavian vein stenosis.
-
The length of the wire inserted is determined by the size of the
patient. Monitor patient for arrhythmia throughout this
procedure. The patient should be placed on a cardiac monitor
during this procedure. Cardiac arrhythmias may result if
guidewire is allowed to pass into the right atrium. The
guidewire should be held securely during this procedure. The
length of the wire inserted is determined by the size of the
patient. Monitor patient for arrhythmia throughout this
procedure. The patient should be placed on a cardiac monitor
during this procedure. Cardiac arrhythmias may result if
guidewire is allowed to pass into the right atrium. The
guidewire should be held securely during this procedure.
-
DO NOT grasp and pull the guidewire prior to releasing the
J-Straightener. Damage to the guidewire may occur if it is
pulled against the restraint of the J- Straightener.
-
DO NOT bend sheath/dilator during insertion as bending will
cause the sheath to prematurely tear. Hold sheath/dilator close
to the tip (approximately 3cm from tip) when initially inserting
through the skin surface. To progress the sheath/dilator towards
the vein, regrasp the sheath/dilator a few centimeters
(approximately 5cm) above the original grasp location and push
down on the sheath/dilator. Repeat procedure until
sheath/dilator is fully inserted.
-
Never leave sheath in place as an indwelling catheter. Damage to
the vein will occur.
- Do not tunnel through muscle.
-
Use extreme care during assembly of the extension adapter to the
lumen in order to avoid damaging the lumen.
-
Assure that all air has been aspirated from the catheter and
extensions. Failure to do so may result in air embolism.
-
Do not turn the adapter and/or compression plug more than one
half turn as lumen may kink resulting in poor blood flow.
-
Failure to verify catheter placement may result in serious
trauma or fatal complications.
-
Only clamp catheter with in-line clamps provided.
-
Extension clamps should only be open for aspiration, flushing,
and dialysis treatment.
-
Always review hospital or unit protocol, potential complications
and their treatment, warnings, and precautions prior to
undertaking any type of mechanical or chemical intervention in
response to catheter performance problems.
-
Only a physician familiar with the appropriate techniques should
attempt the following procedures (Catheter Lock, Catheter
Removal)
-
Due to risk of exposure to HIV or other blood borne pathogens,
health care professionals should always use Universal Blood and
Body Fluid Precautions in the care of all patients.
-
Always review hospital or unit protocol, potential complications
and their treatment, warnings, and precautions prior to catheter
removal.
-
When removing the catheter, DO NOT use a sharp, jerking motion
or undue force; this may tear the catheter. Free the lumen from
the tissue prior to removal.
Other Relevant Aspects of Safety: For a period of
01 January 2020 to 31 March 2025 there were 51 complaints for
28,740 units sold, giving an overall complaint rate of 0.18%.
There were no death-related events. No events resulted in recalls
during the review period.
5. Summary of Clinical Evaluation and Post-Market Clinical
Follow-Up (PMCF)
Summary of Clinical Data Related to Subject Device
Specific Case Numbers (Mixed Cohort Case Numbers) Identified and
Used for Clinical Performance Evaluation
| Product Family |
Clinical Literature |
PMCF Data |
Total Cases |
User Survey Responses |
| Clinical Literature |
3,375 |
1,028 |
4,403 |
0 |
Clinical performance was measured using parameters including but
not limited to dwell time, catheter insertion outcomes, and
adverse event rates. Critical clinical parameters extracted from
these studies met standards set forth in the guidelines for the
State of the Art. There were no unforeseen adverse events or other
high occurrences of adverse events detected in any of the clinical
activities. Medcomp® catheters are subjected to, and must pass,
simulated use testing intended to replicate use 3 times per week
for 12 months as part of device development. The Canaud Catheter
passed this testing. Although Medcomp® catheters contain no
materials which degrade over time, fully functional catheters may
be removed for other reasons, such as intractable infection,
change of therapy (such as Renal replacement (transplant) or use
of an arterio-venous graft/fistula). Published clinical literature
does not always focus on the physical lifetime of a catheter for
these reasons. In the case of the Canaud Catheter, 738 catheters
had a 14.2 month [Range: 3 months – 10 years] duration of use that
has been found in clinical use reported to date. Based on this
information, the Canaud Catheter has a 12-month lifetime; however,
the decision to remove and/or replace the catheter should be based
on clinical performance and need, and not any predetermined point
in time.
Summary of Clinical Data Related to the Equivalent Device
An equivalent device was not used for the device’s clinical
evaluation.
Summary of Clinical Data from Pre-Market Investigations (if
applicable)
No pre-market clinical devices were used for the device’s clinical
evaluation.
Summary of Clinical Data from Other Sources
Source:Summary of Published Literature
Summary: Clinical evidence literature searches have found fourteen
published literature articles representing 404 Canaud device
family specific cases and an additional 2,968 mixed cohort cases
inclusive of the Canaud device family. The articles include one
randomized controlled trial (Klouche et al., 2007), five
prospective studies (Jean et al., 2001, Karaaslan et al., 2001,
Canaud et al., 2002, Lemaire et al., 2009, Heng et al., 2011),
four retrospective studies (Jean et al., 2009, Beaussart et al.,
2012, Canaud et al., 2023, Canaud et al., 2023), and four
uncontrolled studies (Canaud et al., 1998, Leblanc et al., 1998,
Cardelli et al., 1998, Cardelli et al., 2001). Bibliography:
Beaussart H, Décaudin B, Résibois JP, Odou P, Azar R. Tunneled
hemodialysis catheters complications: A retrospective and
monocentric comparative study of two devices. Nephrologie et
Therapeutique. 2012;8(2):101-105. Canaud B, Leray-Moragues H,
Garrigues V, Mion C. Permanent twin catheter: A vascular access
option of choice for haemodialysis in elderly patients. Nephrology
Dialysis Transplantation. 1998;13(SUPPL. 7):82-88. Canaud B,
Leray-Moragues H, Kerkeni N, Bosc JY, Martin K. Effective flow
performances and dialysis doses delivered with permanent
catheters: A 24-month comparative study of permanent catheters
versus arterio-venous vascular accesses. Nephrology Dialysis
Transplantation. 2002;17(7):1286-1292. Canaud, B., Leray-Moragues,
H., Chenine, L., Morena, M., Miller, G., Canaud, L., &
Cristol, J. P. (2023). Comparative Clinical Performances of
Tunneled Central Venous Catheters versus Arterio-Venous Accesses
in Patients Receiving High-Volume Hemodiafiltration: The Case for
High-Flow DualCath, a Tunneled Two-Single-Lumen Silicone Catheter.
Journal of Clinical Medicine, 12(14), 4732. Canaud, B.,
Leray-Moragues, H., Klouche, K., Morena, M., Chenine, L., Miller,
G., & Canaud, L. (2023). Percutaneous Placement and Management
of High-flow Catheter for Hemodialysis: The Case for DualCath,
Two-tunneled, Single-lumen Silicone Catheters. Indian Journal of
Vascular and Endovascular Surgery, 10(4), 270-275.Cardelli R,
D'Amicone M, Gurioli L, et al. Permanent vascular catheters for
extracorporeal dialysis. Preliminary study: Canaud and Tesio
catheters. Minerva urologica e nefrologica = The Italian journal
of urology and nephrology. 1998;50(1):51-54. Cardelli R, D'Amicone
M, Stramignoni E, et al. Canaud central venous catheters: 4-year
experience. Minerva urologica e nefrologica = The Italian journal
of urology and nephrology. 2001;53(3):139-143. Heng AE, Abdelkader
MH, Diaconita M, et al. Impact of short term use of interdialytic
60% ethanol lock solution on tunneled silicone catheter
dysfunction. Clinical Nephrology. 2011;75(6):534-541. Jean G,
Charra B, Chazot C, Vanel T, Terrat JC, Hurot JM. Long-term
outcome of permanent hemodialysis catheters: A controlled study.
Blood Purification. 2001;19(4):401-407. Jean G, Vanel T, Bresson
É, et al. Une stratégie efficace pour diminuer l’utilisation et
les complications des cathéters veineux centraux tunnelisés en
hémodialyse. Néphrologie & Thérapeutique. 2009;5(4):280-6.
Karaaslan H, Peyronnet P, Benevent D, Lagarde C, Rince M,
Leroux-Robert C. Risk of heparin lock-related bleeding when using
indwelling venous catheter in haemodialysis. Nephrology Dialysis
Transplantation. 2001;16(10):2072-2074. Klouche K, Amigues L,
Deleuze S, Beraud JJ, Canaud B. Complications, Effects on Dialysis
Dose, and Survival of Tunneled Femoral Dialysis Catheters in Acute
Renal Failure. American Journal of Kidney Diseases.
2007;49(1):99-108. Leblanc M, Bosc JY, Vaussenat F, Maurice F,
Leray-Moragues H, Canaud B. Effective blood flow and recirculation
rates in internal jugular vein twin catheters: Measurement by
ultrasound velocity dilution. American Journal of Kidney Diseases.
1998;31(1):87-92. Lemaire X, Morena M, Leray-Moragués H, et al.
Analysis of risk factors for catheter-related bacteremia in 2000
permanent dual catheters for hemodialysis. Blood Purif.
2009;28(1):21-28.
• Source:PMCF_LTHD_212
The Fichier Canaud database was acquired from Hemotech on 11
February 2020. Catheter placements include those done by Prof.
Bernard Canaud at the Montpellier University Hospital. This
database was updated during the data collection period 10 October
1990 – 26 March 2012. Real-world performance data on the use of
Medcomp Canaud catheters was measured against acceptance criteria
derived from State of the Art safety and performance outcome
measures from published literature. The 1028 cases used for
analysis exceeded the sample size determination of 89 described in
PMCF_LTHD_212_Protocol. The following outcome measures were
confirmed to be within State of the Art safety and performance
outcome measures from published literature for Medcomp Canaud
long-term hemodialysis catheters:
Dwell Time (212.56 days 95%CI: 192.06 – 233.07)
Procedural Outcomes (96.21% 95%CI: 95% - 97.4%)
Catheter Related Blood Stream Infection (CRBSI) Rate (0.35 per
1,000 catheter days 95%CI: 0 – 0.43)
Tunnel Infection Rate (0.17 per 1,000 catheter days 95%CI: 0 –
0.23)
Exit Site Infection Rate (0.27 per 1,000 catheter days 95%CI: 0 –
0.34)
Catheter Associated Venous Thrombus (CAVT) Rate (0.08 per 1,000
catheter days 95%CI: 0 – 0.12) Catheter handling in France is
supervised by best practices and catheter handling policies that
include strict and meticulous hygienic handling (Canaud et al.
& Lemaire et al.) for the creation of a sterile barrier
(sterile gown, gloves, drapes, mask, etc.) involving two persons
and relying on catheter closure with various locking solutions.
Infection rates have remained very low over several decades as
shown in several publications.
• Source:PMCF_Medcomp_211
The Medcomp User Survey acquired responses from healthcare
personnel familiar with any number of Medcomp’s product offerings.
28 respondents responded that they or their facility have used
Medcomp long-term hemodialysis catheters, with 0 of those
respondents using the Canaud device. There were no differences in
mean user sentiments within long-term hemodialysis catheters
across State of the Art Performance and Safety Outcome Measures or
between device types relating to safety or performance. The
following data points were collected from users of Medcomp
long-term hemodialysis catheters (n=28):
(Mean Likert Scale Response) Catheters function as intended – 4.8
/ 5
(Mean Likert Scale Response) Packaging allows for aseptic
presentation – 4.8 / 5
(Mean Likert Scale Response) Benefit outweighs the risk – 4.7 / 5
Dwell Time (n=26) – 167 days (95%CI: 130 – 203)
Overall Summary of Clinical Safety and Performance
Upon review of the Canaud Catheter data across all sources, it is
possible to conclude that the benefits of the subject device,
which is facilitating hemodialysis in patients in whom other
therapies or conservative care are not indicated or desirable as
determined by the physician, outweigh the overall and individual
risks when the device is used as intended by the manufacturer. It
is the manufacturer’s and clinical expert evaluator’s opinion that
activities both complete and ongoing are sufficient to support the
safety, efficacy, and acceptable benefit/risk profile of the
Canaud catheters.
Summary of clinical data related to the subject device
| Outcome |
Benefit/Risk Acceptability Criteria |
Desired Trend |
Clinical Literature (Subject Device) |
PMCF Data (Subject Device) |
| Performance Outcomes |
| Dwell Time |
Greater than 40 days |
+
|
6.6 months – 14.2 months (Summary of Published
Literature)
|
212.56 days (PMCF_LTHD_212)
|
| Procedural Outcomes |
Greater than 93.3% |
+
|
100% (Summary of Published Literature)
|
96.21% insertions without complication (PMCF_LTHD_212)
|
| Safety Outcomes |
|
Catheter Related Blood Stream Infection (CRBSI)
|
Less than 4.8 incidents of CRBSI per 1,000 catheter days
|
-
|
0.514 – 1.3 per 1,000 catheter days (Summary of Published
Literature)
|
0.35 per 1,000 catheter days (PMCF_LTHD_212)
|
| Tunnel Infection Rate |
Less than 2.8 incidents of tunnel infection per 1,000
catheter days
|
-
|
ND**
|
0.17 per 1,000 catheter days (PMCF_LTHD_212)
|
| Exit Site Infection Rate |
Less than 3.2 incidents of exit site infection per 1,000
catheter days
|
-
|
0.77 – 1.1 per 1,000 catheter days (Summary of Published
Literature)
|
0.27 per 1,000 catheter days (PMCF_LTHD_212)
|
|
Catheter Associated Venous Thrombus (CAVT)
|
Less than 3.04 incidents of CAVT per 1,000 catheter days
|
-
|
0 events / 15 catheters (0 per 1,000 catheter days) - 10
events / 738 catheters (0.031 per 1,000 catheter days*)
(Summary of Published Literature)
|
0.08 per 1,000 catheter days (PMCF_LTHD_212)
|
*Event rate is an estimate based on available information in the
reference.:
**ND indicates No Data on the clinical outcome parameter:
On-going or planned Post-Market Clinical Follow-up (PMCF)
| Outcome |
Benefit/Risk Acceptability Criteria |
Desired Trend |
Clinical Literature (Subject Device) |
PMCF Data (Subject Device) |
| Performance Outcomes |
|
Multi-center Patient-Level Case Series
|
Collect additional clinical data on the device by acquiring
case data healthcare personnel familiar with the device.
|
PMCF_LTHD_241
|
Q4 2025
|
|
| State of the Art Literature Search |
Identify risks and trends with use of similar devices by
reviewing applicable standards, published literature,
conference abstracts, guidance documents and
recommendations; information relating to the medical
condition managed by the device and medical alternatives
available for the same target treated population.
|
SAP-HD
|
Q2 2026
|
|
| Clinical Evidence Literature Search |
Identify risks and trends with use of the device by
reviewing any clinical data relevant to the device from
published literature.
|
LRP-HD
|
Q2 2026
|
|
| Global Trial Database Search |
Identify ongoing clinical trials involving Canaud catheters.
|
N/A
|
Q2 2026
|
|
| Safety Outcomes |
On-going or Planned Post-Market Clinical Follow-Up (PMCF)
| Activity |
Description |
Reference |
Timeline |
|
Multi-center Patient-Level Case Series
|
Collect additional clinical data on the device by acquiring
case data healthcare personnel familiar with the device.
|
PMCF_LTHD_241 |
Q4 2025 |
| State of the Art Literature Search |
Identify risks and trends with use of similar devices by
reviewing applicable standards, published literature,
conference abstracts, guidance documents and
recommendations; information relating to the medical
condition managed by the device and medical alternatives
available for the same target treated population.
|
SAP-HD |
Q2 2026 |
| Clinical Evidence Literature Search |
Identify risks and trends with use of the device by
reviewing any clinical data relevant to the device from
published literature.
|
LRP-HD |
Q2 2026 |
| Global Trial Database Search |
Identify ongoing clinical trials involving Canaud catheters.
|
N/A |
Q2 2026 |
No emerging risks, complications or unexpected device failures
have been detected from PMCF activities.
6. Possible Therapeutic Alternatives
The Kidney Disease Outcomes Quality Initiative (KDOQI) 2019
clinical practice guidelines have been used to support the below
recommendations for treatments.
| Therapy |
Benefits |
Disadvantages |
Key Risks |
| • AV Fistula |
-
Permanent vascular access solution
-
Lower complication rate than hemodialysis via catheter
|
- Requires time to mature
-
Patients must sometimes self-cannulate
|
- Stenosis
- Thrombosis
- Aneurysm
- Pulmonary hypertension
- Steal Syndrome
- Septicemia
|
| • Hemodialysis Catheter |
-
Useful for quick vascular access without AV Fistula in
place
-
Can be used as a bridge dialysis method between other
therapies
|
- Not a permanent solution
-
Catheter dysfunction can disrupt regular treatment
-
Benefit is not equal for all patient populations
|
- Post-procedural bleeding
- Infection
- Thrombosis
-
Decreased blood flow in dysfunctional catheter
- Cardiovascular events
-
Fibrin sheath formation around catheter
- Septicemia
|
| • Peritoneal Dialysis |
-
Less restrictive diet than hemodialysis
-
Does not require hospitalization, can be done in any
clean place
|
-
Clearance of impurities is limited by dialysate flow and
peritoneal area
|
- Peritonitis
- Septicemia
- Fluid overload
|
| • Kidney Transplant |
-
Better quality of life compared to HD
-
Lower risk of death compared to HD
-
Fewer dietary restrictions compared to HD
|
-
Requires a donor which can take time
-
More risky for certain groups (aged, diabetics, etc.)
-
Patient must take rejection medication for life
-
Rejection medication has side effects
|
- Thrombosis
- Hemorrhage
- Ureteral blockage
- Infection
- Organ rejection
- Death
- Myocardial infarction
- Stroke
|
| • Comprehensive Conservative Care |
-
Less imposed symptom burden than dialysis
- Preserves life satisfaction
|
- May aggravate clinical condition
-
Not designed to treat, but to minimize adverse events
|
-
Treatment may not actually minimize risks associated
with CKD
|
7. Suggested Profile and Training for Users
The catheter should be inserted, manipulated, and removed by a
qualified, licensed physician or other qualified health care
professional under the direction of a physician. In certain
circumstances, patients who may be suitable for home hemodialysis
may manipulate the external connections of the catheter. As per
guidelines stated from the International Society of Hemodialysis,
if home dialysis is recommended, each patient will undergo a
thorough training in order to obtain optimal results from home
dialysis treatments. The objectives of the training program are to
(1) provide the appropriate amount of information to ensure that
the patient will be able to dialyze safely at home; (2) enable the
patient to monitor and manage other elements of his or her chronic
kidney disease, such as obtaining samples for lab work and
maintaining appropriate nutrition and diet; and (3) help the
patient and his or her care partner(s) cope with barriers and
fears associated with home HD During training, the patient will
also receive technical education on the operations and maintenance
of the water treatment system. During training, the ideal nurse
trainer-to-patient ratio is typically 1:1. An idealized schedule
of training is created, with weekly areas of focus and training
objectives. In practice, however, training is individualized to
address any identified learning barriers or risks for failure.
8. Reference to Any Harmonized Standards and Common Specifications
(CS) Applied
| Harmonized Standard or CS |
Revision |
Title or Description |
Level of Compliance |
| EN ISO 14971 |
2019 |
Medical devices. Application of risk management to medical
devices
|
Full |
| EN ISO 10555-1 |
2013+A1:2017 |
Intravascular catheters. Sterile and single-use catheters.
General requirements
|
Full |
| EN ISO 10555-3 |
2013 |
Intravascular catheters. Sterile and single-use catheters.
Central venous catheters
|
Full |
| EN ISO 11607-1 |
2020+A1:2022 |
Packaging for terminally sterilized medical devices.
Requirements for materials, sterile barrier systems and
packaging systems
|
Full |
| EN ISO 11607-2 |
2020+A1:2022 |
Packaging for terminally sterilized medical devices.
Validation requirements for forming, sealing and assembly
processes
|
Full |
| MEDDEV 2.7.1 |
Rev 4 |
Clinical Evaluation: A Guide for Manufacturers and Notified
Bodies Under Directives 93/42/EEC and 90/385/EEC
|
Full |
| EN ISO 10993-1 |
2020 |
Biological evaluation of medical devices — Part 1:
Evaluation and testing within a risk management process
|
Full |
| EN ISO 10993-18 |
2020+A1:2023 |
Biological evaluation of medical devices — Part 18: Chemical
characterization of medical device materials within a risk
management process
|
Full |
| EN ISO 10993-7 |
2008+ A1:2022 |
Biological evaluation of medical devices — Part 7: Ethylene
oxide sterilization residuals — Amendment 1: Applicability
of allowable limits for neonates and infants
|
Full |
| EN ISO 11135 |
2014 + A1: 2019 |
Sterilization of health-care products. Ethylene oxide.
Requirements for the development, validation and routine
control of a sterilization process for medical devices
|
Full |
| ISO 14644-1 |
2015 |
Cleanrooms and associated controlled environments — Part 1:
Classification of air cleanliness by particle concentration
|
Full |
| ISO 14644-2 |
2015 |
Cleanrooms and associated controlled environments — Part 2:
Monitoring to provide evidence of cleanroom performance
related to air cleanliness by particle concentration
|
Full |
| EN 556-1 |
2001 |
Sterilization of medical devices. Requirements for medical
devices to be designated "STERILE". Requirements for
terminally sterilized medical devices
|
Full |
| EN ISO 11737-1 |
2018 + A1: 2021 |
Sterilization of health care products. Microbiological
methods. Determination of a population of microorganisms on
products
|
Full |
| EN ISO 20417 |
2021 |
Medical Devices - Information supplied by the manufacturer
|
Full |
| EN ISO 15223-1 |
2021 |
Medical devices — Symbols to be used with medical device
labels, labelling and information to be supplied — Part 1:
General requirements
|
Full |
| EN ISO 80369-7 |
2021 |
Small-bore connectors for liquids and gases in healthcare
applications Part 7: Connectors for intravascular or
hypodermic applications
|
Full |
| EN 62366-1 |
2015 + A1: 2020 |
Medical devices — Part 1: Application of usability
engineering to medical devices
|
Full |
| ASTM D4332-22 |
2022 |
Standard Practice for Conditioning Containers, Packages, or
Packaging Components for Testing
|
Full |
| ASTM D4169-16 |
2016 |
Standard Practice for Performance Testing of Shipping
Containers and Systems
|
Full |
| ASTM F2503-20 |
2020 |
Standard Practice for Marking Medical Devices and Other
Items for Safety in the Magnetic Resonance Environment
|
Full |
| EN ISO 11070 |
2014+A1:2018 |
Sterile single-use intravascular introducers, dilators and
guidewires
|
Full |
| EN ISO 13485 |
2016 + A11: 2021 |
Medical Devices – Quality Management system – Requirements
for Regulatory Purposes
|
Full |
| ISO/TR 20416 |
2020 |
Medical devices — Post-market surveillance for manufacturers
|
Full |
| MEDDEV 2.12/2 |
Rev. 2 |
GUIDELINES ON MEDICAL DEVICES POST MARKET CLINICAL FOLLOW-UP
STUDIES A GUIDE FOR MANUFACTURERS AND NOTIFIED BODIES
|
Full |
| MDCG 2020-7 |
2020 |
Post-market clinical follow-up (PMCF) Plan Template A guide
for manufacturers and notified bodies
|
Full |
| MDCG 2020-8 |
2020 |
Post-market clinical follow-up (PMCF) Evaluation Report
Template A guide for manufacturers and notified bodies
|
Full |
| MDCG 2022-9 |
2022 |
Summary of safety and clinical performance
|
Full |
| MDCG 2022-21 |
2022 |
Guidance on Periodic Safety Update Report (PSUR) According
to Regulation (EU) 2017/745 (MDR)
|
Full |
| MDCG-2020-6 |
2020 |
Clinical evidence needed for medical devices previously CE
marked under Directives 93/42/EEC or 90/385/EEC
|
Full |
| EN ISO 14155 |
2020 |
Clinical investigation of medical devices for human subjects
— Good clinical practice
|
Full |
| MDCG 2018-1 |
Rev. 4 |
Guidance on BASIC UDI-DI and changes to UDI-DI
|
Full |
| EN ISO 11138-1 |
2017 |
Sterilization of health care products — Biological
indicators Part 1: General requirements
|
Full |
| ISO 11138-2 |
2017 |
Sterilization of health care products—Biological
indicators—Part 2: Biological indicators for ethylene oxide
sterilization processes
|
Full |
| ISO 11138-7 |
2019 |
Sterilization of health care products. Biological indicators
- Guidance for the selection, use and interpretation of
results
|
Full |
| EN ISO 11140-1 |
2014 |
Sterilization of health care products — Chemical indicators
Part 1: General requirements
|
Full |
| EN ISO/IEC 17025 |
2017 |
General requirements for the competence of testing and
calibration laboratories
|
Full |
| Regulation (EU) 2017/745 |
2017 |
Regulation (EU) 2017/745 of the European Parliament and of
the Council
|
Full |
Revision History
| Revision |
Date |
CR# |
Author |
Description of Changes |
Validated |
| 1 |
05OCT2021 |
26536 |
RS |
Implementation of SSCP |
No, this version was not validated by the Notified Body as
this is a Class IIa or IIb implantable device
|
| 2 |
15MAR2022 |
27030 |
RS |
Scheduled Update for SSCP |
No, this version was not validated by the Notified Body as
this is a Class IIa or IIb implantable device
|
| 3 |
01AUG2022 |
27030 |
Robert Shifko |
Scheduled Update; updated SSCP in accordance with CER 011_D.
In addition, the following elements were added throughout
|
No, this version was not validated by the Notified Body as
this is a Class IIa or IIb implantable device
|
| 4 |
19SEP2022 |
27293 |
George Miller |
Added additional information to Revision 3 row. Section 8
has been updated to align with the most current harmonized
standards and Common Specifications (CS) applied.
Quantification of Residual Risks has been updated to align
with harm categories in IFU.
|
No, this version was not validated by the Notified Body as
this is a Class IIa or IIb implantable device
|
| 5 |
10JUL2023 |
28266 |
GM |
Periodic Update; Updated in Accordance with CER-011,
Revision E
|
No, this version was not validated by the Notified Body as
this is a Class IIa or IIb implantable device
|
| 6 |
01JUL2024 |
29460 |
GM |
Periodic Update; Updated in Accordance with CER-011,
Revision F
|
No, this version was not validated by the Notified Body as
this is a Class IIa or IIb implantable device
|
| 7 |
05SEP2025 |
25-0171 |
GM |
Periodic Update; Updated in Accordance with CER-011,
Revision G
|
No, this version was not validated by the Notified Body as
this is a Class IIa or IIb implantable device
|