Important Information
This Summary of Safety and Clinical Performance (SSCP) is intended
to provide public access to an updated summary of the main aspects
of the safety and clinical performance of the device. This SSCP is
not intended to replace the Instructions for Use as the main
document to ensure the safe use of the device, nor is it intended
to provide diagnostic or therapeutic suggestions to intended users
or patients.
Applicable Documents
| Document Type |
Document Title / Number |
| Design History File (DHF) |
10013, 10014 |
| ‘MDR Documentation’ File Number |
MDR-008 |
1. Device Identification and General Information
Device Trade Name(s): Hemo-Cath® LT
Manufacturer Name and Address: Medical
Components, Inc. 1499 Delp Drive Harleysville, PA 19438 USA
Manufacturer Single Registration Number (SRN):
US-MF-000008230
Basic UDI-DI: 00884908106MS
Medical Device Nomenclature: F900202 – Permanent
Hemodialysis Catheter and Kits
Class of Device: III
Date First CE Certificate Issued: Nov-97
Authorized Representative Name and SRN: European
Regulatory Expert Medical Product Service GmbH (MPS) Borngasse 20
35619 Braunfels, Germany SRN: DE-AR-000005009
Notified Body Name and Single Identification Number:
BSI Netherlands NB2797
Device Grouping and Variants
The devices in scope of this document are all long-term
hemodialysis catheter sets. The device part numbers are organized
into variant categories. These devices are distributed as
procedure trays, in various configurations inclusive of
accessories and adjunctive devices (see section “Accessories
intended for use in combination with the Device”).
Variant Devices:
Variant Devices:
| Variant Description |
Part Number(s) |
Explanation of Multiple Part Numbers |
| 12.5F x 15cm Straight Hemo Cath LT |
30540-815-100 |
|
| 12.5F x 18cm Straight Hemo Cath LT |
30540-818-100 |
|
| 12.5F x 24cm Straight Hemo Cath LT |
30540-824-100 |
|
| 12.5F x 28cm Pre-Curved Hemo Cath LT |
3293G |
|
| 12.5F x 28cm Straight Hemo Cath LT |
3289G |
|
| 12.5F x 32cm Pre-Curved Hemo Cath LT |
3294G |
|
| 12.5F x 32cm Straight Hemo Cath LT |
3306G |
|
| 8F x 18cm Straight Hemo Cath LT |
3189G |
|
| 8F x 24cm Straight Hemo Cath LT |
3190G |
|
Variant Devices:
| Variant Description |
Part Number(s) |
Explanation of Multiple Part Numbers |
Procedure Trays:
Procedure Trays:
| Catalog Code |
Part Number |
Description |
| SL18P |
3189G |
8F x 18cm Hemo-Cath® LT Catheter Set (Cuff 15cm From Tip)
|
| SL24P |
3190G |
8F x 24cm Hemo-Cath® LT Catheter Set (Cuff 21cm From Tip)
|
| MC101241 |
30540-815-100 |
12.5F x 15cm Hemo-Cath® LT Catheter Set (Cuff 10cm From Tip)
|
| MC101242 |
30540-818-100 |
12.5F x 18cm Hemo-Cath® LT Catheter Set (Cuff 13cm From Tip)
|
| MC101243 |
30540-824-100 |
12.5F x 24cm Hemo-Cath® LT Catheter Set (Cuff 19cm From Tip)
|
| SL28E. |
3289G |
12.5F x 28cm Hemo-Cath® LT Catheter Set (Cuff 23cm From Tip)
|
| SL32E. |
3306G |
12.5F x 32cm Hemo-Cath® LT Catheter Set (Cuff 27cm From Tip)
|
| SL28PCE. |
3293G |
12.5F x 28cm Pre-Curved Hemo-Cath® LT Catheter Set (Cuff
23cm From Tip)
|
| SL32PCE. |
3294G |
12.5F x 32cm Pre-Curved Hemo-Cath® LT Catheter Set (Cuff
27cm From Tip)
|
Procedure Trays:
| Catalog Code |
Part Number |
Description |
Configurations of Procedure Trays:
| Configuration Type |
Kit Components |
| 8F Set |
(1) Catheter (1) 1.3mm OD x 1.0mm ID x 70mm (18GA)
INTRODUCER NEEDLE (1) 0.97mm x 70cm (.038) GUIDEWIRE J (R
3mm) TIP (1) Advancer (1) Tunneler (1) 3.4mm ID x 18cm (10F)
PEELABLE INTRODUCER (1) Scalpel (1) Hemo-Cath Clip (2) End
Caps (1) Patient ID Card (1) Patient Information Packet
|
| 12.5F Set |
(1) Catheter (1) 1.3mm OD x 1.0mm ID x 70mm (18GA)
INTRODUCER NEEDLE (1) 0.97mm x 70cm (.038) GUIDEWIRE J (R
3mm) TIP (1) Advancer (1) Tunneler (1) Tunneler Sleeve (1)
4.4mm ID x 18cm (13F) PEELABLE INTRODUCER (1) Scalpel (1)
Hemo-Cath Clip (2) End Caps (1) Patient ID Card (1) Patient
Information Packet
|
| 12.5F Pre-Curved Set |
(1) Catheter (1) 1.3mm OD x 1.0mm ID x 70mm (18GA)
INTRODUCER NEEDLE (1) 0.97mm x 70cm (.038) GUIDEWIRE J (R
3mm) TIP (1) Advancer (1) Tunneler (1) Tunneler Sleeve (1)
4.4mm ID x 18cm (13F) PEELABLE INTRODUCER (1) Scalpel (2)
End Caps (1) Patient ID Card (1) Patient Information Packet
|
2. Intended Use of the Device
Intended Purpose: Hemo-Cath® LT Catheters are
intended for use in adult and pediatric patients who do not have
functional permanent vascular access or are not candidates for
permanent vascular access for whom central venous vascular access
for hemodialysis and apheresis is deemed necessary based on the
direction of a qualified, licensed physician. The catheter is
intended to be used under the regular review and assessment of
qualified health professionals. This catheter is for Single Use
Only.
Indication(s): Hemo-Cath® LT Catheters are
indicated for short-term or long- term use where vascular access
is required for 14 days or more for the purpose of hemodialysis
and apheresis.
Target Population(s): Hemo-Cath® LT Catheters are
intended for use in adult and pediatric patients who do not have
functional permanent vascular access or are not candidates for
permanent vascular access for whom central venous vascular access
for hemodialysis and apheresis is deemed necessary based on the
direction of a qualified, licensed physician.
Contraindications and/or Limitations:
-
Known or suspected allergies to any of the components of the
catheter or the kit.
-
This device is contraindicated for patients exhibiting severe,
uncontrolled coagulopathy or thrombocytopenia.
3. Device Description
Device Name: Hemo-Cath® LT Catheter Sets Product
Family
Description of Device: The Hemo-Cath® LT Catheter
is a long-term double lumen, single access catheter that is used
to remove and return blood through two separate passages (lumens).
Each lumen is connected through an extension line. The transition
between lumen and extension is housed within a molded hub. Each
lumen has the priming volume identified by identification rings
assembled into the clamps on the extensions. A polyester cuff is
placed on the catheter’s lumen for tissue ingrowth to anchor the
catheter. The catheter incorporates Barium Sulphate to facilitate
visualization under fluoroscopy or Xray. The catheter has been
tested at flow rates of up to 400 mL/min (12.5F) and 250 mL/min
(8F). The catheter is available in a variety of sizes to
accommodate physician preference and clinical needs.
Device Name: Hemo-Cath® LT Catheter Sets Product
Family
Description of Device: The Hemo-Cath® LT Catheter
is a long-term double lumen, single access catheter that is used
to remove and return blood through two separate passages (lumens).
Each lumen is connected through an extension line. The transition
between lumen and extension is housed within a molded hub. Each
lumen has the priming volume identified by identification rings
assembled into the clamps on the extensions. A polyester cuff is
placed on the catheter’s lumen for tissue ingrowth to anchor the
catheter. The catheter incorporates Barium Sulphate to facilitate
visualization under fluoroscopy or Xray. The catheter has been
tested at flow rates of up to 400 mL/min (12.5F) and 250 mL/min
(8F). The catheter is available in a variety of sizes to
accommodate physician preference and clinical needs.
Materials / Substances in Contact with Patient Tissue:
The percentage ranges in the table below are based on the weights
of the 18cm catheter (11.44g) and the 24cm catheter (11.81g).
8F Hemo-Cath® LT
| Material |
% Weight (w/w) |
| Silicone |
54.70 - 55.66 |
| Acetal co-polymer |
20.19 - 20.85 |
| Polyurethane |
14.99 - 15.48 |
| Acrylonitrile Butadiene Styrene |
6.04 - 6.24 |
| Barium sulfate |
1.75 - 2.17 |
| Polyethylene terephthalate |
0.95 - 0.99 |
The percentage ranges in the table below are based on the weights
of the 15cm catheter (12.08g) and the 32cm catheter (13.89g).
12.5F Hemo-Cath® LT
| Material |
% Weight (w/w) |
| Silicone |
55.00 - 58.92 |
| Acetal co-polymer |
17.16 - 19.74 |
| Polyurethane |
13.31 - 15.31 |
| Acrylonitrile Butadiene Styrene |
5.20 - 5.98 |
| Barium sulfate |
1.91 - 3.62 |
| Polyethylene terephthalate |
1.79 - 2.06 |
Note:Per the instructions for use, the device is contraindicated
for patients with known or suspected allergies to the above
materials.
Note:Accessories containing stainless steel may contain up to 4%
weight of the CMR substance cobalt.
Information on Medicinal Substances in the Device:
N/A
How the Device Achieves its Intended Mode of Action:
Hemodialysis catheters are centrally placed access tubes. A
typical hemodialysis catheter uses a thin, flexible tube. The tube
has two openings. The tube goes into a large vein. The vein is
usually the internal jugular vein. Blood withdraws through one
lumen of the catheter. The blood flows to the dialysis machine
through a separate tubing set. The blood is then processed and
filtered. The blood returns to the patient through the second
lumen. This device is used when dialysis must start at once.
Patients may not have a functioning AV fistula or graft. Catheter
hemodialysis normally happens on a short-term basis. Long-term
access may occur in some cases. For example, when there are
problems supporting an AV fistula or graft. The catheter may also
be used for apheresis. Apheresis can happen in a blood bank
facility or hemodialysis center. Like hemodialysis, apheresis
treatments withdraw blood from the catheter and then return blood
through the catheter. There are different types of apheresis.
Where hemodialysis cleans blood, apheresis separates and removes a
component of blood.
Sterilization Information: Contents sterile and
non-pyrogenic in unopened, undamaged package. Sterilized by
Ethylene Oxide.
Previous Generations / Variants:
| Name of Previous Generation |
Differences from Current Device |
| N/A |
N/A |
Accessories Intended for Use in Combination with the
Device:
| Name of Accessory |
Description of Accessory |
| Guidewire |
For general intravascular use to facilitate the selective
placement of medical devices in the vessel anatomy.
|
| Guidewire Advancer |
Aid for introduction of guidewire into target vein.
|
| Introducer Needle |
Used for the percutaneous introduction of guidewires.
|
| Scalpel |
A cutting device during surgical, pathology and minor
medical procedures
|
| Tunneler |
Instrument used to create a subcutaneous tunnel
|
| Hemo-Cath Clip |
Anchoring clip curves the extensions |
| Peelable Introducer |
Introducers are intended to obtain central venous access to
facilitate catheter insertion into the central venous
system.
|
| Dilator |
Designed for percutaneous entry into a vessel in order to
enlarge the opening of the vessel for the placement of a
catheter in a vein.
|
| End Cap |
To keep clean and protect catheter luer between treatments.
|
Other Devices or Products Intended for Use in Combination with
the Device:
| Name of Device or Product |
Description of Device or Product |
| Tegaderm |
Adhesive wound dressing intended to protect the catheter
from contamination when not in use
|
| Syringe |
Attached to introducer needle to help capture blood return
once introducer needle perforates targeted vein, prevent air
embolism
|
4. Risks and Warnings
Residual Risks and Undesirable Effects: As per
product IFU (IFU 40767BSI), All surgical procedures carry risk.
Medcomp has implemented risk management processes to proactively
find and mitigate these risks as far as possible without adversely
affecting the benefit-risk profile of the device. After
mitigation, residual risks and the possibility of adverse events
from use of this product remain. Medcomp has determined that all
residual risks are acceptable.
| Residual Harm Type |
Possible Adverse Events Associated with Harm
|
| Bleeding |
Bleeding (May be severe)
|
| Cardiac Event |
Cardiac Arrhythmia
|
| Embolism |
Air Embolus
|
| Infection |
Bacteremia
|
| Perforation |
Inferior Vena Cava Puncture
|
| Thrombosis |
Central Venous Thrombosis
|
| Miscellaneous Complications |
Brachial Plexus Injury
|
|
Quantification of Residual Risks
|
|
PMS Complaints January 2019 – 30 September 2024
|
PMCF Events |
|
Units Sold: 36,417 |
Units Studied: 495 |
|
Patient Residual Harm Category
|
% of Devices |
% of Devices |
| Allergic Reaction |
Not Reported |
0.2% |
| Bleeding |
0.014% |
0.2% |
| Cardiac Event |
0.003% |
0.2% |
| Embolism |
Not Reported |
Not Reported |
| Infection |
0.003% |
9.90% |
| Perforation |
Not Reported |
Not Reported |
| Stenosis |
Not Reported |
Not Reported |
| Tissue Injury |
Not Reported |
Not Reported |
| Thrombosis |
Not Reported |
0.2% |
| Miscellaneous Complications |
Not Reported |
Not Reported |
Warnings and Precautions:
All warnings have been reviewed against the risk analysis, PMS,
and usability testing to validate consistency between the sources
of information. As per product IFU (IFU 40767BSI), the Hemo-Cath
LT Catheters have the following warnings:
-
Do not insert catheter in thrombosed vessels.
-
Do not advance the guidewire or catheter if unusual resistance
is encountered.
-
Do not insert or withdraw the guidewire forcibly from any
component. If the guidewire becomes damaged, guidewire and any
associated componentry must be removed together.
-
Do not resterilize the catheter or accessories by any method.
-
Contents sterile and non-pyrogenic in unopened, undamaged
package. STERILIZED BY ETHYLENE OXIDE
-
Do not re-use catheter or accessories as there may be a failure
to adequately clean and decontaminate the device which may lead
to contamination, catheter degradation, device fatigue, or
endotoxin reaction.
-
Do not use catheter or accessories if package is opened or
damaged.
-
Do not use catheter or accessories if any sign of product damage
is visible or the use-by date has passed.
-
Do not use sharp instruments near the extension tubing or
catheter lumen.
- Do not use scissors to remove dressing.
-
DO not use iodine or iodine-based disinfectants on this
catheter. Failure of catheter will occur. Alcohol based
solutions are recommended as the antiseptic solution that can be
used on this catheter. Precautions listed in the Hemo-Cath LT
Catheter IFUs are as follows:
-
Examine catheter lumen and extensions before and after each
treatment for damage.
-
To prevent accidents, ensure the security of all caps and
bloodline connections prior to and between treatments.
-
Use only Luer Lock (threaded) Connectors with this catheter.
-
In the rare event that a hub or connector separates from any
component during insertion or use, take all necessary steps and
precautions to prevent blood loss or air embolism and remove the
catheter.
-
Before attempting catheter insertion, ensure that you are
familiar with the potential complications and their emergency
treatment should any of them occur.
-
Repeated overtightening of bloodlines, syringes, and caps will
reduce connector life and could lead to potential connector
failure.
-
The catheter will be damaged if clamps other than what is
provided with this kit are used.
-
Avoid clamping near the Luer Lock and hub of the catheter.
Clamping of the tubing repeatedly in the same location may
weaken tubing. Additional warnings and cautions listed in the
Hemo-Cath® LT Catheter IFUs are as follows:
-
Physician discretion is strongly advised when inserting this
catheter in patients who are unable to take or hold a deep
breath.
-
Patients requiring ventilator support are at increased risk of
pneumothorax during subclavian vein cannulation, which may cause
complications.
-
Extended use of the subclavian vein may be associated with
subclavian vein stenosis.
-
Do not over-expand subcutaneous tissue during tunneling.
Over-expansion may delay/prevent cuff in-growth.
-
Do not pull tunneler out at an angle. Keep tunneler straight to
prevent damage to catheter tip.
-
DO NOT grasp and pull the guidewire prior to releasing the
J-Straightener. Damage to the guidewire may occur if it is
pulled against the restraint of the J-Straightener.
-
The length of the wire inserted is determined by the size of the
patient. Monitor patient for arrhythmia throughout this
procedure. The patient should be placed on a cardiac monitor
during this procedure. Cardiac arrhythmias may result if
guidewire is allowed to pass into the right atrium. The
guidewire should be held securely during this procedure.
-
DO NOT bend the sheath/dilator during insertion as bending will
cause the sheath to prematurely tear. Hold sheath/dilator close
to the tip (approximately 3cm from tip) when initially inserting
through the skin surface. To progress the sheath/dilator towards
the vein, regrasp the sheath/dilator a few centimeters
(approximately 5cm) above the original grasp location and push
down on the sheath/dilator. Repeat procedure until
sheath/dilator is fully inserted.
-
Never leave sheath in place as an indwelling catheter. Damage to
the vein will occur.
-
Do not clamp the dual lumen portion of the catheter. Clamp only
the extensions. Do not use serrated forceps, use only the
in-line clamps provided.
-
Do not pull apart the portion of the sheath that remains in the
vessel. To avoid vessel damage, pull back the sheath as far as
possible and tear the sheath only a few centimeters at a time.
-
Assure that all air has been aspirated from the catheter and
extensions. Failure to do so may result in air embolism.
-
Failure to verify catheter placement may result in serious
trauma or fatal complications.
-
Care must be taken when using sharp objects or needles in close
proximity to catheter lumen. Contact from sharp objects may
cause catheter failure.
-
Only clamp catheter with in-line clamps provided.
-
Extension clamps should only be open for aspiration, flushing,
and dialysis treatment.
-
Always review hospital or unit protocol, potential complications
and their treatment, warnings, and precautions prior to
undertaking any type of mechanical or chemical intervention in
response to catheter performance problems.
-
Only a physician familiar with the appropriate techniques should
attempt the following procedures.
-
Do not pull distal end of catheter through incision as
contamination of wound may occur.
Other Relevant Aspects of Safety: For a period of
01 January 2019 to 30 September 2024 there were 134 complaints for
36,417 units sold, giving an overall complaint rate of 0.368%.
There were zero death-related events. No events resulted in
recalls during the review period.
5. Summary of Clinical Evaluation and Post-Market Clinical
Follow-Up (PMCF)
Summary of Clinical Data Related to Subject Device
Specific Case Numbers (Mixed Cohort Case Numbers) Identified and
Used for Clinical Performance Evaluation
| Product Family |
Clinical Literature |
PMCF Data |
Total Cases |
User Survey Responses |
| Apheresis |
0 |
399 |
399 |
0 |
| Hemodialysis |
342 |
96 |
438 |
1 |
| Unknown |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
| Total |
342 |
495 |
837 |
1 |
| Adults |
115 |
468 |
583 |
0 |
| Pediatrics |
227 |
27 |
254 |
0 |
| Unknown |
0 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
| Total |
342 |
495 |
837 |
1 |
| 8F |
103 |
19 |
122 |
0 |
| 12.5F |
84 |
476 |
560 |
1 |
| Unknown |
155 |
0 |
155 |
0 |
| Total |
342 |
495 |
837 |
1 |
Clinical performance was measured using parameters including but
not limited to dwell time, catheter insertion outcomes, and
adverse event rates. Critical clinical parameters extracted from
these studies met standards set forth in the guidelines for the
State of the Art. There were no unforeseen adverse events or other
high occurrences of adverse events detected in any of the clinical
activities. Medcomp® catheters are subjected to, and must pass,
simulated use testing intended to replicate use 3 times per week
for 12 months as part of device development. The Hemo-Cath® LT
Catheter passed this testing. Although Medcomp® catheters contain
no materials which degrade over time, fully functional catheters
may be removed for other reasons, such as intractable infection,
change of therapy (such as Renal replacement (transplant) or use
of an arterio-venous graft/fistula). Published clinical literature
does not always focus on the physical lifetime of a catheter for
these reasons. In the case of the Hemo-Cath® LT Catheter, 401
catheters had a 49.1 day [95%CI: 40.7 – 57.5 days] duration of use
that has been found in clinical use reported to date. Based on
this information, the Hemo-Cath® LT Catheter has a 12 month
lifetime; however, the decision to remove and/or replace the
catheter should be based on clinical performance and need, and not
any predetermined point in time.
Summary of Clinical Data Related to the Equivalent Device
Clinical evidence from published literature and PMCF activities
has been generated specific to known and unknown variants of the
subject device. The equivalency rationale in the updated clinical
evaluation report will demonstrate that the clinical evidence
available for these variants is representative of the range of
device variants in the device family. There are no clinical or
biological differences between variants within the subject device
family, and the potential impact of the technical differences will
be rationalized in the updated clinical evaluation report.
Summary of Clinical Data from Pre-Market Investigations (if
applicable)
No pre-market clinical devices were used for the device’s clinical
evaluation.
Summary of Clinical Data from Other Sources
Source:Summary of Published Literature
Clinical evidence literature searches have found eleven published
literature articles representing 342 Hemo-Cath® LT device family
specific cases and an additional 4,870 mixed cohort cases
inclusive of the Hemo-Cath® LT device family. The articles include
two prospective studies (Lucas et al., 2014, Mohamed et al.,
2022), nine retrospective studies (Stravropoulos et al., 2003,
Onder et al., 2007, Haas et al., 2010, Granata et al., 2018, Silva
et al., 2020, Kumar et al., 2021, Novljan et al., 2023, Prakash et
al., 2023, Salah et al., 2024), and two case studies (Lin et al.,
2013, Lin et al., 2024). Bibliography: Granata A, Zanoli L, Trezzi
M, et al. Anatomical variations of the left anonymous trunk are
associated with central venous catheter dysfunction. Journal of
Nephrology. 2018;31(4):571-576. Lin ZC, Wu DK, Lin WC, Jaw TS,
Chen HS, Liu GC. Stent-graft treatment of iatrogenic vertebral
artery pseudoaneurysm and arteriovenous fistula. Chinese Journal
of Radiology (Taiwan). 2013;38(4):135-138. Lucas TC, Tessarolo F,
Veniero P, et al. Quantification of fibrin in blood thrombi formed
in hemodialysis central venous catheters: A pilot study on 43
CVCs. Journal of Vascular Access. 2014;15(4):278-285. Haas B,
Chittams JL, Trerotola SO. Large-bore Tunneled Central Venous
Catheter Insertion in Patients with Coagulopathy. Journal of
Vascular and Interventional Radiology. 2010;21(2):212-217. Kumar
G. Catheter‑related blood stream infections among children on
hemodialysis over 7 years: A single‑center experience. Asian J
Pediatr Nephrol 2021;4:22-5. Onder AM, Chandar J, Saint-Vil M, et
al. Catheter survival and comparison of catheter exchange methods
in children on hemodialysis. Pediatric nephrology (Berlin,
Germany) 2007;22:1355-61. Jesus-Silva SGd, Oliveira JdS, Ramos
KTF, et al. Análise das taxas de infecção e duração de cateteres
de hemodiálise de curta e longa permanência em hospital de ensino.
J vasc bras. 2020;19. Stavropoulos SW, Pan JJ, Clark TWI, et al.
Percutaneous transhepatic venous access for hemodialysis. Journal
of Vascular and Interventional Radiology. 2003;14(9 I):1187-1190.
Prakash, R., Ohri, A., Udani, A., & Ali, U. S. (2023).
Survival of Tunneled Double Lumen Cuffed Catheters in Children on
Maintenance Hemodialysis–A Retrospective Cohort Study. Indian
Journal of Nephrology, 33(5), 348-355. Salah, D. M., Fadel, F. I.,
Abdel Mawla, M. A., Mooty, H. N., Ghobashy, M. E., Salem, A. M.,
... & Abd Alazem, E. A. (2024). Vascular access challenges in
hemodialysis children. Italian Journal of Pediatrics, 50(1), 11.
Novljan, G., Rus, R. R., &. Battelino, N. (2023). Comparison
of cuffed and uncuffed catheter-related bloodstream infection
rates in small hemodialysis patients. Pediatr Nephrol 38,
2255–2491 Lin, T. C., Huang, H. E., Liu, C. A., Na, M. Y., Tsai,
H. L., & Chang, J. W. (2024). Bidirectional approach of
vascular access for balloon angioplasty in permcath-associated
superior vena cava syndrome presenting with transudative
chylothorax. Pediatrics & Neonatology, 65(5), 506-508.
Mohamed, E. G., Ahmed, S., Mostafa, G., & Bazaraa, M. (2022).
Image Guided Techniques for Central Venous Access in Critically
Ill Pediatric Patients. The Medical Journal of Cairo University,
90(12), 2131-2141.
Source:LTHD Data Collection Survey Report_B
The Long-Term Hemodialysis Catheter Data Collection Survey was
intended to gather safety and performance outcome information from
sites that purchase Medcomp long-term hemodialysis catheters for
use in EU MDR clinical evaluation. Responses were requested to be
completed by physicians or other site employees with oversight and
direction from a physician. The surveys were distributed globally
to existing Medcomp customers. Responses were collected from
twenty-one sites, spanning nine countries (Colombia, Croatia, El
Salvador, Greece, Italy, Netherlands, Panama, Uruguay, and USA)
across North America, South/Latin America, and Europe. All
patients described in this survey listed hemodialysis as the
indication for treatment, with an average age of 70.9 years.
Patient gender was not recorded in the survey. All 57 catheters
described in the study were 12.5F Hemo-Cath® LT Catheters of 28cm
length. Parameter:Value:Standard Deviation:95% Confidence Interval
Dwell Time (Mean Days):104.6:65.7:43.8 – 165.4 Procedural Outcomes
(Insertion Success):100%:N/A:100% - 100% Catheter Related Blood
Stream Infection (CRBSI) (number per 1,000 catheter
days):0:N/A:N/A Tunnel Infection Rate (number per 1,000 catheter
days):0:N/A:N/A Exit Site Infection Rate (number per 1,000
catheter days):1.37:N/A:N/A Catheter Associated Venous Thrombus
(CAVT) (number per 1,000 catheter days):1.37:N/A:N/A
Source:Dr. Trerotola Data Report_B
The dataset was provided by Scott O. Trerotola, MD an
Interventional Radiologist at the Hospital of the University of
Pennsylvania. Dr. Trerotola is also Stanley Baum Professor of
Radiology, Professor of Radiology in Surgery, Vice Chair for
Quality, Radiology, Associate Chair and Chief, Interventional
Radiology, and Director, Penn HHT Center of Excellence at the
Perelman School of Medicine at the University of Pennsylvania. The
dataset is consecutive, comprehensive, and includes catheter
placements by interventional radiology Attending and Fellowship
Physicians, as well as Residents under Attending supervision. All
401 Hemo-Cath® LT catheters described in the study were 12.5F
Hemo-Cath® LT Catheters of variable lengths inserted
percutaneously. There were 324 catheters of 28cm length, 73
catheters of 32cm length, and 4 catheters of unknown length. 399
catheters were indicated for apheresis, and 2 catheters were
indicated for hemodialysis. 73 catheters were placed with the Left
Internal Jugular, 324 catheters were placed in the Right Internal
Jugular, and the insertion site of 1 catheter was unknown.
Parameter:Value:Standard Deviation:95% Confidence Interval Dwell
Time (Mean Days):49.1:86:40.7 – 57.5 Procedural Outcomes
(Insertion Success):99.3%:N/A:98.5% - 100% Catheter Related Blood
Stream Infection (CRBSI) (number per 1,000 catheter
days):1.83:N/A:N/A Tunnel Infection Rate (number per 1,000
catheter days):0.36:N/A:N/A Exit Site Infection Rate (number per
1,000 catheter days):0.05:N/A:N/A Catheter Associated Venous
Thrombus (CAVT) (number per 1,000 catheter days):0:N/A:N/A
• Source:PMCF_Medcomp_211
The Medcomp User Survey acquired responses from healthcare
personnel familiar with any number of Medcomp’s product offerings.
28 respondents responded that they or their facility have used
Medcomp long-term hemodialysis catheters, with 3 of those
respondents using the Hemo-Cath LT device. There were no
differences in mean user sentiments within long-term hemodialysis
catheters across State of the Art Performance and Safety Outcome
Measures or between device types relating to safety or
performance. The following data points were collected from users
of Medcomp long-term hemodialysis catheters (n=28):
(Mean Likert Scale Response) Catheters function as intended – 4.8
/ 5
(Mean Likert Scale Response) Packaging allows for aseptic
presentation – 4.8 / 5
(Mean Likert Scale Response) Benefit outweighs the risk – 4.7 / 5
Dwell Time (n=26) – 167 days (95%CI: 130 – 203) The following data
points were collected from users of Medcomp Hemo-Cath® LT
catheters (n=3):
(Mean Likert Scale Response) Catheters function as intended – 4.6
/ 5
(Mean Likert Scale Response) Packaging allows for aseptic
presentation – 4.3 / 5
(Mean Likert Scale Response) Benefit outweighs the risk – 4.3 / 5
Dwell Time (n=3) – 161.3 days (95%CI: 0 – 466.7)
• Source:PMCF_Infusion_211
The Infusion Product Line Data Collection Survey aimed to assess
safety and performance outcome information for all variants of
Medcomp Infusion Ports, PICCs, Midlines, and CVCs. 70 survey
responses were collected from 17 countries representing 471 device
cases. 2 Hemo-Cath® LT cases, inclusive of several variant
categories across French size (8F, 12.5F) and length (18cm, 24cm)
were collected. The following outcome measures were collected for
the Medcomp Hemo-Cath® LT device:
Dwell Time – 30 days
Procedural Outcomes – 100%
Catheter Related Blood Stream Infection – No Events Reported
Catheter Associated Venous Thrombus – No Events Reported
Exit Site Infection – No Events Reported
• Source:PMCF_LTHD_242
The Long-Term Hemodialysis (LTHD) Truveta data analysis assessed
safety and performance outcome information for Medcomp® and
competitor devices present in Truveta Studio. Truveta data comes
from a growing collective of more than 30 health systems that
provide 17% of the daily clinical care across all 50 U.S. states
from 800 hospitals and 20,000 clinics, representing the full
diversity of the United States. The population used for data
analysis was derived utilizing Truveta Studio’s proprietary coding
language (Prose) and unique device identifier (UDI) codes
representing all saleable Medcomp® LTHD devices and LTHD devices
distributed and/or manufactured by other companies. 35 Hemo-Cath®
LT cases inclusive of several variant devices were collected. All
cases were described as 8F and 12.5F and Straight and Pre-Curved
Cases, configurations (straight, pre-curved), and lengths (18cm,
24cm, 28cm, 32cm), representation of 18cm, 24cm, 28cm and 32cm
length catheters. The following State of the Art safety and
performance outcome measures were observed for Medcomp Hemo-Cath®
LT devices:
Catheter Related Blood Stream Infection – 2.2 per 1,000 catheter
days (95%CI: 0.89 – 4.58)
Catheter Associated Venous Thrombus – 0 per 1,000 catheter days
(95%CI: 0 – 1.17)
Exit Site Infection – 0.32 per 1,000 catheter days (95%CI: 0.01 –
1.77)
Tunnel Infection – 0 per 1,000 catheter days (95%CI: 0 – 1.17)
Dwell Time – 16 days (95%CI: 0 – 45.59)
Overall Summary of Clinical Safety and Performance
| Outcome |
Benefit/Risk Acceptability Criteria |
Desired Trend |
Clinical Literature (Subject Device) |
PMCF Data (Subject Device) |
| Performance Outcomes |
| Dwell Time |
Greater than 40 days |
+
|
110 days – 281 days (Summary of Published Literature)
|
104.6 days (LTHD Data Collection Survey Report) 49.1 days
(Dr. Trerotola Data Report) 161.3 days (PMCF_Medcomp_211)
Likert Scale Response 4.3 / 5 (PMCF_Medcomp_211)** 30 Days
(PMCF_Infusion_211) 16 Days (PMCF_LTHD_242)
|
| Procedural Outcomes |
Greater than 93.3% |
+
|
100% (Summary of Published Literature)
|
100% (LTHD Data Collection Survey Report & Section
6.5.8) 99.3% (Dr. Trerotola Data Report) Likert Scale
Response 4.6 / 5 (PMCF_Medcomp_211)**
|
| Safety Outcomes |
|
Catheter Related Blood Stream Infection (CRBSI)
|
Less than 4.8 incidents of CRBSI per 1,000 catheter days
|
-
|
1.72 – 10.1*** per 1,000 catheter days (Summary of Published
Literature)
|
No Events Reported (LTHD Data Collection Survey Report &
PMCF_Infusion_211) 1.83 per 1,000 catheter days (Dr.
Trerotola Data Report) Likert Scale Response 4.3 / 5
(PMCF_Medcomp_211)** 2.2 per 1,000 catheter days
(PMCF_LTHD_242)
|
| Tunnel Infection Rate |
Less than 2.8 incidents of tunnel infection per 1,000
catheter days
|
-
|
ND*
|
No Events Reported (LTHD Data Collection Survey Report &
PMCF_Infusion_211) 0.36 per 1,000 catheter days (Dr.
Trerotola Data Report) Likert Scale Response 4.6 / 5
(PMCF_Medcomp_211)** 0 per 1,000 catheter days
(PMCF_LTHD_242)
|
| Exit Site Infection Rate |
Less than 3.2 incidents of exit site infection per 1,000
catheter days
|
-
|
ND*
|
1.37 per 1,000 catheter days (LTHD Data Collection Survey
Report) 0.05 per 1,000 catheter days (Dr. Trerotola Data
Report) Likert Scale Response 4 / 5 (PMCF_Medcomp_211)**
0.32 per 1,000 catheter days (PMCF_LTHD_242)
|
|
Catheter Associated Venous Thrombus (CAVT)
|
Less than 3.04 incidents of CAVT per 1,000 catheter days
|
-
|
0.79 – 2.4 per 1,000 catheter days (Summary of Published
Literature)
|
1.37 per 1,000 catheter days (LTHD Data Collection Survey
Report) No Events Reported (Dr. Trerotola Data Report)
Likert Scale Response 3.6 / 5 (PMCF_Medcomp_211)** 0 per
1,000 catheter days (PMCF_LTHD_242)
|
*ND:indicates no data on the clinical data parameter
**PMCF_Medcomp_211:asked respondents, if they agreed on a scale
of 1 -5, that their experience in relation to each outcome was the
same or better than the benefit/risk acceptability criteria.
*** Salah et al, 2024:report cuffed CVCs were utilized in young
children (weighing less than 9 kg) with veins too small for
fistula needles, as well as in individuals with previously
unsuccessful arteriovenous fistulas (AVFs) and those with vascular
complications (such as previously failed or thrombosed AVFs).
| Outcome |
Benefit/Risk Acceptability Criteria |
Desired Trend |
Clinical Literature (Subject Device) |
PMCF Data (Subject Device) |
| Performance Outcomes |
| Safety Outcomes |
On-going or Planned Post-Market Clinical Follow-Up (PMCF)
| Activity |
Description |
Reference |
Timeline |
|
Multi-center Patient-Level Case Series
|
Collect additional clinical data on the device by acquiring
case data healthcare personnel familiar with the device.
|
PMCF_LTHD_241 |
Q4 2025 |
| State of the Art Literature Search |
Identify risks and trends with use of similar devices by
reviewing applicable standards, published literature,
conference abstracts, guidance documents and
recommendations; information relating to the medical
condition managed by the device and medical alternatives
available for the same target treated population.
|
SAP-HD |
Q2 2026 |
| Clinical Evidence Literature Search |
Identify risks and trends with use of the device by
reviewing any clinical data relevant to the device from
published literature.
|
LRP-HD |
Q2 2026 |
| Global Trial Database Search |
Identify ongoing clinical trials involving Hemo-Cath® LT
catheters.
|
N/A |
Q2 2026 |
No emerging risks, complications or unexpected device failures
have been detected from PMCF activities.
6. Possible Therapeutic Alternatives
The Kidney Disease Outcomes Quality Initiative (KDOQI) 2019
clinical practice guidelines have been used to support the below
recommendations for treatments.
| Therapy |
Benefits |
Disadvantages |
Key Risks |
| • AV Fistula |
-
Permanent vascular access solution
-
Lower complication rate than hemodialysis via catheter
|
- Requires time to mature
-
Patients must sometimes self-cannulate
|
- Stenosis
- Thrombosis
- Aneurysm
- Pulmonary hypertension
- Steal Syndrome
- Septicemia
|
| • Hemodialysis Catheter |
-
Useful for quick vascular access without AV Fistula in
place
-
Can be used as a bridge dialysis method between other
therapies
|
- Not a permanent solution
-
Catheter dysfunction can disrupt regular treatment
-
Benefit is not equal for all patient populations
|
- Post-procedural bleeding
- Infection
- Thrombosis
-
Decreased blood flow in dysfunctional catheter
- Cardiovascular events
-
Fibrin sheath formation around catheter
- Septicemia
|
| • Peritoneal Dialysis |
-
Less restrictive diet than hemodialysis
-
Does not require hospitalization, can be done in any
clean place
|
-
Clearance of impurities is limited by dialysate flow and
peritoneal area
|
- Peritonitis
- Septicemia
- Fluid overload
|
| • Kidney Transplant |
-
Better quality of life compared to HD
-
Lower risk of death compared to HD
-
Fewer dietary restrictions compared to HD
|
-
Requires a donor which can take time
-
More risky for certain groups (aged, diabetics, etc.)
-
Patient must take rejection medication for life
-
Rejection medication has side effects
|
- Thrombosis
- Hemorrhage
- Ureteral blockage
- Infection
- Organ rejection
- Death
- Myocardial infarction
- Stroke
|
| • Comprehensive Conservative Care |
-
Less imposed symptom burden than dialysis
- Preserves life satisfaction
|
- May aggravate clinical condition
-
Not designed to treat, but to minimize adverse events
|
-
Treatment may not actually minimize risks associated
with CKD
|
| • AV Fistula |
-
Permanent vascular access solution
-
Lower complication rate than hemodialysis via catheter
|
- Requires time to mature
-
Patients must sometimes self-cannulate
|
- Stenosis
- Thrombosis
- Aneurysm
- Pulmonary hypertension
- Steal Syndrome
- Septicemia
|
| • Hemodialysis Catheter |
-
Useful for quick vascular access without AV Fistula in
place
-
Can be used as a bridge dialysis method between other
therapies
|
- Not a permanent solution
-
Catheter dysfunction can disrupt regular treatment
-
Benefit is not equal for all patient populations
|
- Post-procedural bleeding
- Infection
- Thrombosis
-
Decreased blood flow in dysfunctional catheter
- Cardiovascular events
-
Fibrin sheath formation around catheter
- Septicemia
|
| • Infusion CVC |
- Capable of multiple infusions
-
Ideal for initiation of extracorporeal therapies
- Easy access once in place
- Minimizes repeated venipuncture
-
Increased patient mobility during infusion
- Easier for outpatient treatment
|
-
Inability to obtain venous access in emergent situations
-
Requires surgical procedure for placement
- Risks associated with surgery
|
- general anesthesia, etc.
- Requires maintenance
-
High risk of infection or thrombotic event
|
| • Implantable Port |
-
Decreases puncture wounds/vein damage compared to
traditional injection
-
Easier to visualize, palpate, and therefore safer form
of IV access
-
Reduces chance for corrosive medications to make skin
contact
-
Only one venipuncture for both treatment and lab draw,
as opposed to two for traditional IV
-
Longer dwelling time compared to IV
- Can be permanent, if needed
- Flow rates vary by device
-
Cosmetically, less displeasing than CVCs
|
-
Requires surgical procedure, but IV does not
- Risks associated with surgery
|
- general anesthesia, etc.
- Requires regular flushing
-
Sometimes breast tissue in females- makes access painful
and difficult
|
|
• Peripheral Intravenous Catheters (PIVs)
|
-
Does not require surgical procedure
|
-
Higher hemolysis rates compared to venipuncture
-
Cannot be used for therapies with blistering agents
- Four days maximum use
|
- Thrombosis
- Phlebitis
- Infection
|
| • AV Fistula |
-
Preferred pediatric vascular access route
- Better solute clearance
-
Lower complication rate than hemodialysis with a
catheter
-
Lower risk of infection and thrombosis
|
-
Technical difficulty in fistula/graft creation in
children with small vasculature
-
Not suitable for certain patient size
|
-
High tendency of vasospasm due to small vessels
-
Primary failure and early access thrombosis
|
| • Hemodialysis Catheter |
-
Great alternative in rapid onset of kidney failure and
short period of time until transplantation
-
Ability to be used in the absence of needle cannulation
-
Decreased risk of high output cardiac failure
|
- High infection rates
- High failure/replacement rate
-
Variable blood flow rates leading to potentially poor
clearance
|
-
Potential complications with significant morbidity and
mortality
- Possible Arrhythmia
-
Permanent damage to central venous system
(stenosis/thrombosis) may occur
|
| • Peritoneal Dialysis |
-
Most suitable for children due to its almost universal
applicability and superior compatibility with lifestyle
over other modalities
|
-
Long-term success is limited by infectious complications
and gradual ultrafiltration failure
|
-
Catheter exit site and tunnel infection
- Peritonitis
|
| • Kidney Transplant |
-
Enhanced linear growth and potential for remarkable
advances in social and intellectual development
-
Graft survival is about 12-15 years in children.
|
-
Increase in the lifetime risk of cancer for pediatric
transplant recipients
-
Size – newborns and infants may not be large enough to
receive a transplant. Patients need to be around 8-10 kg
in size generally.
|
-
Infections, post transplant lymphoproliferative
disorders and malignancy
-
Graft rejection can be difficult to diagnose.
|
7. Suggested Profile and Training for Users
The catheter should be inserted, manipulated, and removed by a
qualified, licensed physician or other qualified health care
professional under the direction of a physician. In certain
circumstances, patients who may be suitable for home hemodialysis
may manipulate the external connections of the catheter. As per
guidelines stated from the International Society of Hemodialysis,
if home dialysis is recommended, each patient will undergo a
thorough training in order to obtain optimal results from home
dialysis treatments. The objectives of the training program are to
(1) provide the appropriate amount of information to ensure that
the patient will be able to dialyze safely at home; (2) enable the
patient to monitor and manage other elements of his or her chronic
kidney disease, such as obtaining samples for lab work and
maintaining appropriate nutrition and diet; and (3) help the
patient and his or her care partner(s) cope with barriers and
fears associated with home HD During training, the patient will
also receive technical education on the operations and maintenance
of the water treatment system. During training, the ideal nurse
trainer-to-patient ratio is typically 1:1. An idealized schedule
of training is created, with weekly areas of focus and training
objectives. In practice, however, training is individualized to
address any identified learning barriers or risks for failure.
8. Reference to Any Harmonized Standards and Common Specifications
(CS) Applied
| Harmonized Standard or CS |
Revision |
Title or Description |
Level of Compliance |
| EN ISO 14971 |
2019 |
Medical devices. Application of risk management to medical
devices
|
Full |
| EN ISO 10555-1 |
2013+A1:2017 |
Intravascular catheters. Sterile and single-use catheters.
General requirements
|
Full |
| EN ISO 10555-3 |
2013 |
Intravascular catheters. Sterile and single-use catheters.
Central venous catheters
|
Full |
| EN ISO 11607-1 |
2020 |
Packaging for terminally sterilized medical devices.
Requirements for materials, sterile barrier systems and
packaging systems
|
Full |
| EN ISO 11607-2 |
2020 |
Packaging for terminally sterilized medical devices.
Validation requirements for forming, sealing and assembly
processes
|
Full |
| MEDDEV 2.7.1 |
Rev 4 |
Clinical Evaluation: A Guide for Manufacturers and Notified
Bodies Under Directives 93/42/EEC and 90/385/EEC
|
Full |
| EN ISO 10993-1 |
2020 |
Biological evaluation of medical devices — Part 1:
Evaluation and testing within a risk management process
|
Full |
| EN ISO 10993-18 |
2020 |
Biological evaluation of medical devices — Part 18: Chemical
characterization of medical device materials within a risk
management process
|
Full |
| EN ISO 10993-7 |
2008+ A1:2019 |
Biological evaluation of medical devices — Part 7: Ethylene
oxide sterilization residuals — Amendment 1: Applicability
of allowable limits for neonates and infants
|
Full |
| EN ISO 11135 |
2014 + A1: 2019 |
Sterilization of health-care products. Ethylene oxide.
Requirements for the development, validation and routine
control of a sterilization process for medical devices
|
Full |
| ISO 14644-1 |
2015 |
Cleanrooms and associated controlled environments — Part 1:
Classification of air cleanliness by particle concentration
|
Full |
| ISO 14644-2 |
2015 |
Cleanrooms and associated controlled environments — Part 2:
Monitoring to provide evidence of cleanroom performance
related to air cleanliness by particle concentration
|
Full |
| EN 556-1 |
2001 |
Sterilization of medical devices. Requirements for medical
devices to be designated "STERILE". Requirements for
terminally sterilized medical devices
|
Full |
| EN ISO 11737-1 |
2018 + A1: 2021 |
Sterilization of health care products. Microbiological
methods. Determination of a population of microorganisms on
products
|
Full |
| EN ISO 20417 |
2021 |
Medical Devices - Information supplied by the manufacturer
|
Full |
| EN ISO 15223-1 |
2021 |
Medical devices — Symbols to be used with medical device
labels, labelling and information to be supplied — Part 1:
General requirements
|
Full |
| EN ISO 80369-7 |
2021 |
Small-bore connectors for liquids and gases in healthcare
applications Part 7: Connectors for intravascular or
hypodermic applications
|
Full |
| EN 62366-1 |
2015 + A1: 2020 |
Medical devices — Part 1: Application of usability
engineering to medical devices
|
Full |
| ASTM D4332-14 |
2014 |
Standard Practice for Conditioning Containers, Packages, or
Packaging Components for Testing
|
Full |
| ASTM D4169-16 |
2016 |
Standard Practice for Performance Testing of Shipping
Containers and Systems
|
Full |
| ASTM F2503-20 |
2020 |
Standard Practice for Marking Medical Devices and Other
Items for Safety in the Magnetic Resonance Environment
|
Full |
| EN ISO 11070 |
2014+A1:2018 |
Sterile single-use intravascular introducers, dilators and
guidewires
|
Full |
| EN ISO 13485 |
2016 + A11: 2021 |
Medical Devices – Quality Management system – Requirements
for Regulatory Purposes
|
Full |
| ISO/TR 20416 |
2020 |
Medical devices — Post-market surveillance for manufacturers
|
Full |
| MEDDEV 2.12/2 |
Rev. 2 |
GUIDELINES ON MEDICAL DEVICES POST MARKET CLINICAL FOLLOW-UP
STUDIES A GUIDE FOR MANUFACTURERS AND NOTIFIED BODIES
|
Full |
| MDCG 2020-7 |
2020 |
Post-market clinical follow-up (PMCF) Plan Template A guide
for manufacturers and notified bodies
|
Full |
| MDCG 2020-8 |
2020 |
Post-market clinical follow-up (PMCF) Evaluation Report
Template A guide for manufacturers and notified bodies
|
Full |
| MDCG 2019-9 |
2022 |
Summary of safety and clinical performance
|
Full |
| MDCG-2020-6 |
2020 |
Clinical evidence needed for medical devices previously CE
marked under Directives 93/42/EEC or 90/385/EEC
|
Full |
| EN ISO 14155 |
2020 |
Clinical investigation of medical devices for human subjects
— Good clinical practice
|
Full |
| MDCG 2018-1 |
Rev. 4 |
Guidance on BASIC UDI-DI and changes to UDI-DI
|
Full |
| EN ISO 11138-1 |
2017 |
Sterilization of health care products — Biological
indicators Part 1: General requirements
|
Full |
| ISO 11138-2 |
2017 |
Sterilization of health care products—Biological
indicators—Part 2: Biological indicators for ethylene oxide
sterilization processes
|
Full |
| ISO 11138-7 |
2019 |
Sterilization of health care products. Biological indicators
- Guidance for the selection, use and interpretation of
results
|
Full |
| EN ISO 11140-1 |
2014 |
Sterilization of health care products — Chemical indicators
Part 1: General requirements
|
Full |
| EN ISO/IEC 17025 |
2017 |
General requirements for the competence of testing and
calibration laboratories
|
Full |
| Regulation (EU) 2017/745 |
2017 |
Regulation (EU) 2017/745 of the European Parliament and of
the Council
|
Full |
Revision History
| Revision |
Date |
CR# |
Author |
Description of Changes |
Validated |
| 1 |
04OCT2021 |
26535 |
RS |
Implementation of SSCP |
No, this version was not validated by the Notified Body as
this is a Class IIa or IIb implantable device
|
| 2 |
25JUL2022 |
27030 |
RS |
Scheduled Update; updated SSCP in accordance with CER-008_C.
In addition, the following elements were added throughout
|
No, this version was not validated by the Notified Body as
this is a Class IIa or IIb implantable device
|
| 3 |
19SEP2022 |
27292 |
GM |
Added additional information to Revision 2 row. Section 8
has been updated to align with the most current harmonized
standards and Common Specifications (CS) applied.
Quantification of Residual Risks has been updated to align
with harm categories in IFU. The total case numbers
identified and used for clinical performance evaluation
displayed in Section 5 has decreased from 5,506 to 672 on
the basis of the exclusion of the following mixed cohort
sources of clinical evidence
|
No, this version was not validated by the Notified Body as
this is a Class IIa or IIb implantable device
|
| 4 |
06JUL2023 |
28266 |
GM |
Periodic Update; Updated in Accordance with CER-008,
Revision D
|
No, this version was not validated by the Notified Body as
this is a Class IIa or IIb implantable device
|
| 5 |
01JUL2024 |
29151 |
GM |
Periodic Update; Updated in Accordance with CER-008_E
|
No, this version was not validated by the Notified Body as
this is a Class IIa or IIb implantable device
|
| 6 |
31JUL2025 |
CR# 25-0051 |
GM |
Periodic Update; Updated in Accordance with CER-008_F
|
No, this version was not validated by the Notified Body as
this is a Class IIa or IIb implantable device
|