Summary of Safety and Clinical Performance

Hemo-Cath® LT

SSCP Document Number: SSCP-008
Revision Number: 6
Revision Date: 31. heinäkuuta 2025

Important Information

This Summary of Safety and Clinical Performance (SSCP) is intended to provide public access to an updated summary of the main aspects of the safety and clinical performance of the device. This SSCP is not intended to replace the Instructions for Use as the main document to ensure the safe use of the device, nor is it intended to provide diagnostic or therapeutic suggestions to intended users or patients.

Applicable Documents

Document Type Document Title / Number
Design History File (DHF) 10013, 10014
‘MDR Documentation’ File Number MDR-008

1. Device Identification and General Information

Device Trade Name(s): Hemo-Cath® LT

Manufacturer Name and Address: Medical Components, Inc. 1499 Delp Drive Harleysville, PA 19438 USA

Manufacturer Single Registration Number (SRN): US-MF-000008230

Basic UDI-DI: 00884908106MS

Medical Device Nomenclature: F900202 – Permanent Hemodialysis Catheter and Kits

Class of Device: III

Date First CE Certificate Issued: Nov-97

Authorized Representative Name and SRN: European Regulatory Expert Medical Product Service GmbH (MPS) Borngasse 20 35619 Braunfels, Germany SRN: DE-AR-000005009

Notified Body Name and Single Identification Number: BSI Netherlands NB2797

Device Grouping and Variants

The devices in scope of this document are all long-term hemodialysis catheter sets. The device part numbers are organized into variant categories. These devices are distributed as procedure trays, in various configurations inclusive of accessories and adjunctive devices (see section “Accessories intended for use in combination with the Device”).

Variant Devices:

Variant Devices:
Variant Description Part Number(s) Explanation of Multiple Part Numbers
12.5F x 15cm Straight Hemo Cath LT 30540-815-100
12.5F x 18cm Straight Hemo Cath LT 30540-818-100
12.5F x 24cm Straight Hemo Cath LT 30540-824-100
12.5F x 28cm Pre-Curved Hemo Cath LT 3293G
12.5F x 28cm Straight Hemo Cath LT 3289G
12.5F x 32cm Pre-Curved Hemo Cath LT 3294G
12.5F x 32cm Straight Hemo Cath LT 3306G
8F x 18cm Straight Hemo Cath LT 3189G
8F x 24cm Straight Hemo Cath LT 3190G
Variant Devices:
Variant Description Part Number(s) Explanation of Multiple Part Numbers

Procedure Trays:

Procedure Trays:
Catalog Code Part Number Description
SL18P 3189G 8F x 18cm Hemo-Cath® LT Catheter Set (Cuff 15cm From Tip)
SL24P 3190G 8F x 24cm Hemo-Cath® LT Catheter Set (Cuff 21cm From Tip)
MC101241 30540-815-100 12.5F x 15cm Hemo-Cath® LT Catheter Set (Cuff 10cm From Tip)
MC101242 30540-818-100 12.5F x 18cm Hemo-Cath® LT Catheter Set (Cuff 13cm From Tip)
MC101243 30540-824-100 12.5F x 24cm Hemo-Cath® LT Catheter Set (Cuff 19cm From Tip)
SL28E. 3289G 12.5F x 28cm Hemo-Cath® LT Catheter Set (Cuff 23cm From Tip)
SL32E. 3306G 12.5F x 32cm Hemo-Cath® LT Catheter Set (Cuff 27cm From Tip)
SL28PCE. 3293G 12.5F x 28cm Pre-Curved Hemo-Cath® LT Catheter Set (Cuff 23cm From Tip)
SL32PCE. 3294G 12.5F x 32cm Pre-Curved Hemo-Cath® LT Catheter Set (Cuff 27cm From Tip)
Procedure Trays:
Catalog Code Part Number Description

Configurations of Procedure Trays:

Configuration Type Kit Components
8F Set (1) Catheter (1) 1.3mm OD x 1.0mm ID x 70mm (18GA) INTRODUCER NEEDLE (1) 0.97mm x 70cm (.038) GUIDEWIRE J (R 3mm) TIP (1) Advancer (1) Tunneler (1) 3.4mm ID x 18cm (10F) PEELABLE INTRODUCER (1) Scalpel (1) Hemo-Cath Clip (2) End Caps (1) Patient ID Card (1) Patient Information Packet
12.5F Set (1) Catheter (1) 1.3mm OD x 1.0mm ID x 70mm (18GA) INTRODUCER NEEDLE (1) 0.97mm x 70cm (.038) GUIDEWIRE J (R 3mm) TIP (1) Advancer (1) Tunneler (1) Tunneler Sleeve (1) 4.4mm ID x 18cm (13F) PEELABLE INTRODUCER (1) Scalpel (1) Hemo-Cath Clip (2) End Caps (1) Patient ID Card (1) Patient Information Packet
12.5F Pre-Curved Set (1) Catheter (1) 1.3mm OD x 1.0mm ID x 70mm (18GA) INTRODUCER NEEDLE (1) 0.97mm x 70cm (.038) GUIDEWIRE J (R 3mm) TIP (1) Advancer (1) Tunneler (1) Tunneler Sleeve (1) 4.4mm ID x 18cm (13F) PEELABLE INTRODUCER (1) Scalpel (2) End Caps (1) Patient ID Card (1) Patient Information Packet

2. Intended Use of the Device

Intended Purpose: Hemo-Cath® LT Catheters are intended for use in adult and pediatric patients who do not have functional permanent vascular access or are not candidates for permanent vascular access for whom central venous vascular access for hemodialysis and apheresis is deemed necessary based on the direction of a qualified, licensed physician. The catheter is intended to be used under the regular review and assessment of qualified health professionals. This catheter is for Single Use Only.

Indication(s): Hemo-Cath® LT Catheters are indicated for short-term or long- term use where vascular access is required for 14 days or more for the purpose of hemodialysis and apheresis.

Target Population(s): Hemo-Cath® LT Catheters are intended for use in adult and pediatric patients who do not have functional permanent vascular access or are not candidates for permanent vascular access for whom central venous vascular access for hemodialysis and apheresis is deemed necessary based on the direction of a qualified, licensed physician.

Contraindications and/or Limitations:

  • Known or suspected allergies to any of the components of the catheter or the kit.
  • This device is contraindicated for patients exhibiting severe, uncontrolled coagulopathy or thrombocytopenia.

3. Device Description

Device Image

Device Name: Hemo-Cath® LT Catheter Sets Product Family

Description of Device: The Hemo-Cath® LT Catheter is a long-term double lumen, single access catheter that is used to remove and return blood through two separate passages (lumens). Each lumen is connected through an extension line. The transition between lumen and extension is housed within a molded hub. Each lumen has the priming volume identified by identification rings assembled into the clamps on the extensions. A polyester cuff is placed on the catheter’s lumen for tissue ingrowth to anchor the catheter. The catheter incorporates Barium Sulphate to facilitate visualization under fluoroscopy or Xray. The catheter has been tested at flow rates of up to 400 mL/min (12.5F) and 250 mL/min (8F). The catheter is available in a variety of sizes to accommodate physician preference and clinical needs.

Device Image

Device Name: Hemo-Cath® LT Catheter Sets Product Family

Description of Device: The Hemo-Cath® LT Catheter is a long-term double lumen, single access catheter that is used to remove and return blood through two separate passages (lumens). Each lumen is connected through an extension line. The transition between lumen and extension is housed within a molded hub. Each lumen has the priming volume identified by identification rings assembled into the clamps on the extensions. A polyester cuff is placed on the catheter’s lumen for tissue ingrowth to anchor the catheter. The catheter incorporates Barium Sulphate to facilitate visualization under fluoroscopy or Xray. The catheter has been tested at flow rates of up to 400 mL/min (12.5F) and 250 mL/min (8F). The catheter is available in a variety of sizes to accommodate physician preference and clinical needs.

Materials / Substances in Contact with Patient Tissue:

The percentage ranges in the table below are based on the weights of the 18cm catheter (11.44g) and the 24cm catheter (11.81g).

8F Hemo-Cath® LT
Material % Weight (w/w)
Silicone 54.70 - 55.66
Acetal co-polymer 20.19 - 20.85
Polyurethane 14.99 - 15.48
Acrylonitrile Butadiene Styrene 6.04 - 6.24
Barium sulfate 1.75 - 2.17
Polyethylene terephthalate 0.95 - 0.99

The percentage ranges in the table below are based on the weights of the 15cm catheter (12.08g) and the 32cm catheter (13.89g).

12.5F Hemo-Cath® LT
Material % Weight (w/w)
Silicone 55.00 - 58.92
Acetal co-polymer 17.16 - 19.74
Polyurethane 13.31 - 15.31
Acrylonitrile Butadiene Styrene 5.20 - 5.98
Barium sulfate 1.91 - 3.62
Polyethylene terephthalate 1.79 - 2.06

Note:Per the instructions for use, the device is contraindicated for patients with known or suspected allergies to the above materials.

Note:Accessories containing stainless steel may contain up to 4% weight of the CMR substance cobalt.

Information on Medicinal Substances in the Device: N/A

How the Device Achieves its Intended Mode of Action: Hemodialysis catheters are centrally placed access tubes. A typical hemodialysis catheter uses a thin, flexible tube. The tube has two openings. The tube goes into a large vein. The vein is usually the internal jugular vein. Blood withdraws through one lumen of the catheter. The blood flows to the dialysis machine through a separate tubing set. The blood is then processed and filtered. The blood returns to the patient through the second lumen. This device is used when dialysis must start at once. Patients may not have a functioning AV fistula or graft. Catheter hemodialysis normally happens on a short-term basis. Long-term access may occur in some cases. For example, when there are problems supporting an AV fistula or graft. The catheter may also be used for apheresis. Apheresis can happen in a blood bank facility or hemodialysis center. Like hemodialysis, apheresis treatments withdraw blood from the catheter and then return blood through the catheter. There are different types of apheresis. Where hemodialysis cleans blood, apheresis separates and removes a component of blood.

Sterilization Information: Contents sterile and non-pyrogenic in unopened, undamaged package. Sterilized by Ethylene Oxide.

Previous Generations / Variants:

Name of Previous Generation Differences from Current Device
N/A N/A

Accessories Intended for Use in Combination with the Device:

Name of Accessory Description of Accessory
Guidewire For general intravascular use to facilitate the selective placement of medical devices in the vessel anatomy.
Guidewire Advancer Aid for introduction of guidewire into target vein.
Introducer Needle Used for the percutaneous introduction of guidewires.
Scalpel A cutting device during surgical, pathology and minor medical procedures
Tunneler Instrument used to create a subcutaneous tunnel
Hemo-Cath Clip Anchoring clip curves the extensions
Peelable Introducer Introducers are intended to obtain central venous access to facilitate catheter insertion into the central venous system.
Dilator Designed for percutaneous entry into a vessel in order to enlarge the opening of the vessel for the placement of a catheter in a vein.
End Cap To keep clean and protect catheter luer between treatments.

Other Devices or Products Intended for Use in Combination with the Device:

Name of Device or Product Description of Device or Product
Tegaderm Adhesive wound dressing intended to protect the catheter from contamination when not in use
Syringe Attached to introducer needle to help capture blood return once introducer needle perforates targeted vein, prevent air embolism

4. Risks and Warnings

Residual Risks and Undesirable Effects: As per product IFU (IFU 40767BSI), All surgical procedures carry risk. Medcomp has implemented risk management processes to proactively find and mitigate these risks as far as possible without adversely affecting the benefit-risk profile of the device. After mitigation, residual risks and the possibility of adverse events from use of this product remain. Medcomp has determined that all residual risks are acceptable.

Residual Harm Type Possible Adverse Events Associated with Harm
Bleeding Bleeding (May be severe)
Cardiac Event Cardiac Arrhythmia
Embolism Air Embolus
Infection Bacteremia
Perforation Inferior Vena Cava Puncture
Thrombosis Central Venous Thrombosis
Miscellaneous Complications Brachial Plexus Injury
Quantification of Residual Risks
PMS Complaints January 2019 – 30 September 2024 PMCF Events
Units Sold: 36,417 Units Studied: 495
Patient Residual Harm Category % of Devices % of Devices
Allergic Reaction Not Reported 0.2%
Bleeding 0.014% 0.2%
Cardiac Event 0.003% 0.2%
Embolism Not Reported Not Reported
Infection 0.003% 9.90%
Perforation Not Reported Not Reported
Stenosis Not Reported Not Reported
Tissue Injury Not Reported Not Reported
Thrombosis Not Reported 0.2%
Miscellaneous Complications Not Reported Not Reported

Warnings and Precautions:

All warnings have been reviewed against the risk analysis, PMS, and usability testing to validate consistency between the sources of information. As per product IFU (IFU 40767BSI), the Hemo-Cath LT Catheters have the following warnings:

  • Do not insert catheter in thrombosed vessels.
  • Do not advance the guidewire or catheter if unusual resistance is encountered.
  • Do not insert or withdraw the guidewire forcibly from any component. If the guidewire becomes damaged, guidewire and any associated componentry must be removed together.
  • Do not resterilize the catheter or accessories by any method.
  • Contents sterile and non-pyrogenic in unopened, undamaged package. STERILIZED BY ETHYLENE OXIDE
  • Do not re-use catheter or accessories as there may be a failure to adequately clean and decontaminate the device which may lead to contamination, catheter degradation, device fatigue, or endotoxin reaction.
  • Do not use catheter or accessories if package is opened or damaged.
  • Do not use catheter or accessories if any sign of product damage is visible or the use-by date has passed.
  • Do not use sharp instruments near the extension tubing or catheter lumen.
  • Do not use scissors to remove dressing.
  • DO not use iodine or iodine-based disinfectants on this catheter. Failure of catheter will occur. Alcohol based solutions are recommended as the antiseptic solution that can be used on this catheter. Precautions listed in the Hemo-Cath LT Catheter IFUs are as follows:
  • Examine catheter lumen and extensions before and after each treatment for damage.
  • To prevent accidents, ensure the security of all caps and bloodline connections prior to and between treatments.
  • Use only Luer Lock (threaded) Connectors with this catheter.
  • In the rare event that a hub or connector separates from any component during insertion or use, take all necessary steps and precautions to prevent blood loss or air embolism and remove the catheter.
  • Before attempting catheter insertion, ensure that you are familiar with the potential complications and their emergency treatment should any of them occur.
  • Repeated overtightening of bloodlines, syringes, and caps will reduce connector life and could lead to potential connector failure.
  • The catheter will be damaged if clamps other than what is provided with this kit are used.
  • Avoid clamping near the Luer Lock and hub of the catheter. Clamping of the tubing repeatedly in the same location may weaken tubing. Additional warnings and cautions listed in the Hemo-Cath® LT Catheter IFUs are as follows:
  • Physician discretion is strongly advised when inserting this catheter in patients who are unable to take or hold a deep breath.
  • Patients requiring ventilator support are at increased risk of pneumothorax during subclavian vein cannulation, which may cause complications.
  • Extended use of the subclavian vein may be associated with subclavian vein stenosis.
  • Do not over-expand subcutaneous tissue during tunneling. Over-expansion may delay/prevent cuff in-growth.
  • Do not pull tunneler out at an angle. Keep tunneler straight to prevent damage to catheter tip.
  • DO NOT grasp and pull the guidewire prior to releasing the J-Straightener. Damage to the guidewire may occur if it is pulled against the restraint of the J-Straightener.
  • The length of the wire inserted is determined by the size of the patient. Monitor patient for arrhythmia throughout this procedure. The patient should be placed on a cardiac monitor during this procedure. Cardiac arrhythmias may result if guidewire is allowed to pass into the right atrium. The guidewire should be held securely during this procedure.
  • DO NOT bend the sheath/dilator during insertion as bending will cause the sheath to prematurely tear. Hold sheath/dilator close to the tip (approximately 3cm from tip) when initially inserting through the skin surface. To progress the sheath/dilator towards the vein, regrasp the sheath/dilator a few centimeters (approximately 5cm) above the original grasp location and push down on the sheath/dilator. Repeat procedure until sheath/dilator is fully inserted.
  • Never leave sheath in place as an indwelling catheter. Damage to the vein will occur.
  • Do not clamp the dual lumen portion of the catheter. Clamp only the extensions. Do not use serrated forceps, use only the in-line clamps provided.
  • Do not pull apart the portion of the sheath that remains in the vessel. To avoid vessel damage, pull back the sheath as far as possible and tear the sheath only a few centimeters at a time.
  • Assure that all air has been aspirated from the catheter and extensions. Failure to do so may result in air embolism.
  • Failure to verify catheter placement may result in serious trauma or fatal complications.
  • Care must be taken when using sharp objects or needles in close proximity to catheter lumen. Contact from sharp objects may cause catheter failure.
  • Only clamp catheter with in-line clamps provided.
  • Extension clamps should only be open for aspiration, flushing, and dialysis treatment.
  • Always review hospital or unit protocol, potential complications and their treatment, warnings, and precautions prior to undertaking any type of mechanical or chemical intervention in response to catheter performance problems.
  • Only a physician familiar with the appropriate techniques should attempt the following procedures.
  • Do not pull distal end of catheter through incision as contamination of wound may occur.

Other Relevant Aspects of Safety: For a period of 01 January 2019 to 30 September 2024 there were 134 complaints for 36,417 units sold, giving an overall complaint rate of 0.368%. There were zero death-related events. No events resulted in recalls during the review period.

5. Summary of Clinical Evaluation and Post-Market Clinical Follow-Up (PMCF)

Summary of Clinical Data Related to Subject Device

Specific Case Numbers (Mixed Cohort Case Numbers) Identified and Used for Clinical Performance Evaluation
Product Family Clinical Literature PMCF Data Total Cases User Survey Responses
Apheresis 0 399 399 0
Hemodialysis 342 96 438 1
Unknown 0 0 0 0
Total 342 495 837 1
Adults 115 468 583 0
Pediatrics 227 27 254 0
Unknown 0 0 0 1
Total 342 495 837 1
8F 103 19 122 0
12.5F 84 476 560 1
Unknown 155 0 155 0
Total 342 495 837 1

Clinical performance was measured using parameters including but not limited to dwell time, catheter insertion outcomes, and adverse event rates. Critical clinical parameters extracted from these studies met standards set forth in the guidelines for the State of the Art. There were no unforeseen adverse events or other high occurrences of adverse events detected in any of the clinical activities. Medcomp® catheters are subjected to, and must pass, simulated use testing intended to replicate use 3 times per week for 12 months as part of device development. The Hemo-Cath® LT Catheter passed this testing. Although Medcomp® catheters contain no materials which degrade over time, fully functional catheters may be removed for other reasons, such as intractable infection, change of therapy (such as Renal replacement (transplant) or use of an arterio-venous graft/fistula). Published clinical literature does not always focus on the physical lifetime of a catheter for these reasons. In the case of the Hemo-Cath® LT Catheter, 401 catheters had a 49.1 day [95%CI: 40.7 – 57.5 days] duration of use that has been found in clinical use reported to date. Based on this information, the Hemo-Cath® LT Catheter has a 12 month lifetime; however, the decision to remove and/or replace the catheter should be based on clinical performance and need, and not any predetermined point in time.

Summary of Clinical Data Related to the Equivalent Device

Clinical evidence from published literature and PMCF activities has been generated specific to known and unknown variants of the subject device. The equivalency rationale in the updated clinical evaluation report will demonstrate that the clinical evidence available for these variants is representative of the range of device variants in the device family. There are no clinical or biological differences between variants within the subject device family, and the potential impact of the technical differences will be rationalized in the updated clinical evaluation report.

Summary of Clinical Data from Pre-Market Investigations (if applicable)

No pre-market clinical devices were used for the device’s clinical evaluation.

Summary of Clinical Data from Other Sources

Source:Summary of Published Literature

Clinical evidence literature searches have found eleven published literature articles representing 342 Hemo-Cath® LT device family specific cases and an additional 4,870 mixed cohort cases inclusive of the Hemo-Cath® LT device family. The articles include two prospective studies (Lucas et al., 2014, Mohamed et al., 2022), nine retrospective studies (Stravropoulos et al., 2003, Onder et al., 2007, Haas et al., 2010, Granata et al., 2018, Silva et al., 2020, Kumar et al., 2021, Novljan et al., 2023, Prakash et al., 2023, Salah et al., 2024), and two case studies (Lin et al., 2013, Lin et al., 2024). Bibliography: Granata A, Zanoli L, Trezzi M, et al. Anatomical variations of the left anonymous trunk are associated with central venous catheter dysfunction. Journal of Nephrology. 2018;31(4):571-576. Lin ZC, Wu DK, Lin WC, Jaw TS, Chen HS, Liu GC. Stent-graft treatment of iatrogenic vertebral artery pseudoaneurysm and arteriovenous fistula. Chinese Journal of Radiology (Taiwan). 2013;38(4):135-138. Lucas TC, Tessarolo F, Veniero P, et al. Quantification of fibrin in blood thrombi formed in hemodialysis central venous catheters: A pilot study on 43 CVCs. Journal of Vascular Access. 2014;15(4):278-285. Haas B, Chittams JL, Trerotola SO. Large-bore Tunneled Central Venous Catheter Insertion in Patients with Coagulopathy. Journal of Vascular and Interventional Radiology. 2010;21(2):212-217. Kumar G. Catheter‑related blood stream infections among children on hemodialysis over 7 years: A single‑center experience. Asian J Pediatr Nephrol 2021;4:22-5. Onder AM, Chandar J, Saint-Vil M, et al. Catheter survival and comparison of catheter exchange methods in children on hemodialysis. Pediatric nephrology (Berlin, Germany) 2007;22:1355-61. Jesus-Silva SGd, Oliveira JdS, Ramos KTF, et al. Análise das taxas de infecção e duração de cateteres de hemodiálise de curta e longa permanência em hospital de ensino. J vasc bras. 2020;19. Stavropoulos SW, Pan JJ, Clark TWI, et al. Percutaneous transhepatic venous access for hemodialysis. Journal of Vascular and Interventional Radiology. 2003;14(9 I):1187-1190. Prakash, R., Ohri, A., Udani, A., & Ali, U. S. (2023). Survival of Tunneled Double Lumen Cuffed Catheters in Children on Maintenance Hemodialysis–A Retrospective Cohort Study. Indian Journal of Nephrology, 33(5), 348-355. Salah, D. M., Fadel, F. I., Abdel Mawla, M. A., Mooty, H. N., Ghobashy, M. E., Salem, A. M., ... & Abd Alazem, E. A. (2024). Vascular access challenges in hemodialysis children. Italian Journal of Pediatrics, 50(1), 11. Novljan, G., Rus, R. R., &. Battelino, N. (2023). Comparison of cuffed and uncuffed catheter-related bloodstream infection rates in small hemodialysis patients. Pediatr Nephrol 38, 2255–2491 Lin, T. C., Huang, H. E., Liu, C. A., Na, M. Y., Tsai, H. L., & Chang, J. W. (2024). Bidirectional approach of vascular access for balloon angioplasty in permcath-associated superior vena cava syndrome presenting with transudative chylothorax. Pediatrics & Neonatology, 65(5), 506-508. Mohamed, E. G., Ahmed, S., Mostafa, G., & Bazaraa, M. (2022). Image Guided Techniques for Central Venous Access in Critically Ill Pediatric Patients. The Medical Journal of Cairo University, 90(12), 2131-2141.

Source:LTHD Data Collection Survey Report_B

The Long-Term Hemodialysis Catheter Data Collection Survey was intended to gather safety and performance outcome information from sites that purchase Medcomp long-term hemodialysis catheters for use in EU MDR clinical evaluation. Responses were requested to be completed by physicians or other site employees with oversight and direction from a physician. The surveys were distributed globally to existing Medcomp customers. Responses were collected from twenty-one sites, spanning nine countries (Colombia, Croatia, El Salvador, Greece, Italy, Netherlands, Panama, Uruguay, and USA) across North America, South/Latin America, and Europe. All patients described in this survey listed hemodialysis as the indication for treatment, with an average age of 70.9 years. Patient gender was not recorded in the survey. All 57 catheters described in the study were 12.5F Hemo-Cath® LT Catheters of 28cm length. Parameter:Value:Standard Deviation:95% Confidence Interval Dwell Time (Mean Days):104.6:65.7:43.8 – 165.4 Procedural Outcomes (Insertion Success):100%:N/A:100% - 100% Catheter Related Blood Stream Infection (CRBSI) (number per 1,000 catheter days):0:N/A:N/A Tunnel Infection Rate (number per 1,000 catheter days):0:N/A:N/A Exit Site Infection Rate (number per 1,000 catheter days):1.37:N/A:N/A Catheter Associated Venous Thrombus (CAVT) (number per 1,000 catheter days):1.37:N/A:N/A

Source:Dr. Trerotola Data Report_B

The dataset was provided by Scott O. Trerotola, MD an Interventional Radiologist at the Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania. Dr. Trerotola is also Stanley Baum Professor of Radiology, Professor of Radiology in Surgery, Vice Chair for Quality, Radiology, Associate Chair and Chief, Interventional Radiology, and Director, Penn HHT Center of Excellence at the Perelman School of Medicine at the University of Pennsylvania. The dataset is consecutive, comprehensive, and includes catheter placements by interventional radiology Attending and Fellowship Physicians, as well as Residents under Attending supervision. All 401 Hemo-Cath® LT catheters described in the study were 12.5F Hemo-Cath® LT Catheters of variable lengths inserted percutaneously. There were 324 catheters of 28cm length, 73 catheters of 32cm length, and 4 catheters of unknown length. 399 catheters were indicated for apheresis, and 2 catheters were indicated for hemodialysis. 73 catheters were placed with the Left Internal Jugular, 324 catheters were placed in the Right Internal Jugular, and the insertion site of 1 catheter was unknown. Parameter:Value:Standard Deviation:95% Confidence Interval Dwell Time (Mean Days):49.1:86:40.7 – 57.5 Procedural Outcomes (Insertion Success):99.3%:N/A:98.5% - 100% Catheter Related Blood Stream Infection (CRBSI) (number per 1,000 catheter days):1.83:N/A:N/A Tunnel Infection Rate (number per 1,000 catheter days):0.36:N/A:N/A Exit Site Infection Rate (number per 1,000 catheter days):0.05:N/A:N/A Catheter Associated Venous Thrombus (CAVT) (number per 1,000 catheter days):0:N/A:N/A

• Source:PMCF_Medcomp_211

The Medcomp User Survey acquired responses from healthcare personnel familiar with any number of Medcomp’s product offerings. 28 respondents responded that they or their facility have used Medcomp long-term hemodialysis catheters, with 3 of those respondents using the Hemo-Cath LT device. There were no differences in mean user sentiments within long-term hemodialysis catheters across State of the Art Performance and Safety Outcome Measures or between device types relating to safety or performance. The following data points were collected from users of Medcomp long-term hemodialysis catheters (n=28):

  • (Mean Likert Scale Response) Catheters function as intended – 4.8 / 5
  • (Mean Likert Scale Response) Packaging allows for aseptic presentation – 4.8 / 5
  • (Mean Likert Scale Response) Benefit outweighs the risk – 4.7 / 5
  • Dwell Time (n=26) – 167 days (95%CI: 130 – 203) The following data points were collected from users of Medcomp Hemo-Cath® LT catheters (n=3):
  • (Mean Likert Scale Response) Catheters function as intended – 4.6 / 5
  • (Mean Likert Scale Response) Packaging allows for aseptic presentation – 4.3 / 5
  • (Mean Likert Scale Response) Benefit outweighs the risk – 4.3 / 5
  • Dwell Time (n=3) – 161.3 days (95%CI: 0 – 466.7)
  • • Source:PMCF_Infusion_211

    The Infusion Product Line Data Collection Survey aimed to assess safety and performance outcome information for all variants of Medcomp Infusion Ports, PICCs, Midlines, and CVCs. 70 survey responses were collected from 17 countries representing 471 device cases. 2 Hemo-Cath® LT cases, inclusive of several variant categories across French size (8F, 12.5F) and length (18cm, 24cm) were collected. The following outcome measures were collected for the Medcomp Hemo-Cath® LT device:

  • Dwell Time – 30 days
  • Procedural Outcomes – 100%
  • Catheter Related Blood Stream Infection – No Events Reported
  • Catheter Associated Venous Thrombus – No Events Reported
  • Exit Site Infection – No Events Reported
  • • Source:PMCF_LTHD_242

    The Long-Term Hemodialysis (LTHD) Truveta data analysis assessed safety and performance outcome information for Medcomp® and competitor devices present in Truveta Studio. Truveta data comes from a growing collective of more than 30 health systems that provide 17% of the daily clinical care across all 50 U.S. states from 800 hospitals and 20,000 clinics, representing the full diversity of the United States. The population used for data analysis was derived utilizing Truveta Studio’s proprietary coding language (Prose) and unique device identifier (UDI) codes representing all saleable Medcomp® LTHD devices and LTHD devices distributed and/or manufactured by other companies. 35 Hemo-Cath® LT cases inclusive of several variant devices were collected. All cases were described as 8F and 12.5F and Straight and Pre-Curved Cases, configurations (straight, pre-curved), and lengths (18cm, 24cm, 28cm, 32cm), representation of 18cm, 24cm, 28cm and 32cm length catheters. The following State of the Art safety and performance outcome measures were observed for Medcomp Hemo-Cath® LT devices:

  • Catheter Related Blood Stream Infection – 2.2 per 1,000 catheter days (95%CI: 0.89 – 4.58)
  • Catheter Associated Venous Thrombus – 0 per 1,000 catheter days (95%CI: 0 – 1.17)
  • Exit Site Infection – 0.32 per 1,000 catheter days (95%CI: 0.01 – 1.77)
  • Tunnel Infection – 0 per 1,000 catheter days (95%CI: 0 – 1.17)
  • Dwell Time – 16 days (95%CI: 0 – 45.59)
  • Overall Summary of Clinical Safety and Performance

    Outcome Benefit/Risk Acceptability Criteria Desired Trend Clinical Literature (Subject Device) PMCF Data (Subject Device)
    Performance Outcomes
    Dwell Time Greater than 40 days + 110 days – 281 days (Summary of Published Literature)
    104.6 days (LTHD Data Collection Survey Report) 49.1 days (Dr. Trerotola Data Report) 161.3 days (PMCF_Medcomp_211) Likert Scale Response 4.3 / 5 (PMCF_Medcomp_211)** 30 Days (PMCF_Infusion_211) 16 Days (PMCF_LTHD_242)
    Procedural Outcomes Greater than 93.3% + 100% (Summary of Published Literature)
    100% (LTHD Data Collection Survey Report & Section 6.5.8) 99.3% (Dr. Trerotola Data Report) Likert Scale Response 4.6 / 5 (PMCF_Medcomp_211)**
    Safety Outcomes
    Catheter Related Blood Stream Infection (CRBSI) Less than 4.8 incidents of CRBSI per 1,000 catheter days - 1.72 – 10.1*** per 1,000 catheter days (Summary of Published Literature)
    No Events Reported (LTHD Data Collection Survey Report & PMCF_Infusion_211) 1.83 per 1,000 catheter days (Dr. Trerotola Data Report) Likert Scale Response 4.3 / 5 (PMCF_Medcomp_211)** 2.2 per 1,000 catheter days (PMCF_LTHD_242)
    Tunnel Infection Rate Less than 2.8 incidents of tunnel infection per 1,000 catheter days - ND*
    No Events Reported (LTHD Data Collection Survey Report & PMCF_Infusion_211) 0.36 per 1,000 catheter days (Dr. Trerotola Data Report) Likert Scale Response 4.6 / 5 (PMCF_Medcomp_211)** 0 per 1,000 catheter days (PMCF_LTHD_242)
    Exit Site Infection Rate Less than 3.2 incidents of exit site infection per 1,000 catheter days - ND*
    1.37 per 1,000 catheter days (LTHD Data Collection Survey Report) 0.05 per 1,000 catheter days (Dr. Trerotola Data Report) Likert Scale Response 4 / 5 (PMCF_Medcomp_211)** 0.32 per 1,000 catheter days (PMCF_LTHD_242)
    Catheter Associated Venous Thrombus (CAVT) Less than 3.04 incidents of CAVT per 1,000 catheter days - 0.79 – 2.4 per 1,000 catheter days (Summary of Published Literature)
    1.37 per 1,000 catheter days (LTHD Data Collection Survey Report) No Events Reported (Dr. Trerotola Data Report) Likert Scale Response 3.6 / 5 (PMCF_Medcomp_211)** 0 per 1,000 catheter days (PMCF_LTHD_242)
    *ND:indicates no data on the clinical data parameter **PMCF_Medcomp_211:asked respondents, if they agreed on a scale of 1 -5, that their experience in relation to each outcome was the same or better than the benefit/risk acceptability criteria. *** Salah et al, 2024:report cuffed CVCs were utilized in young children (weighing less than 9 kg) with veins too small for fistula needles, as well as in individuals with previously unsuccessful arteriovenous fistulas (AVFs) and those with vascular complications (such as previously failed or thrombosed AVFs).
    Outcome Benefit/Risk Acceptability Criteria Desired Trend Clinical Literature (Subject Device) PMCF Data (Subject Device)
    Performance Outcomes
    Safety Outcomes

    On-going or Planned Post-Market Clinical Follow-Up (PMCF)

    Activity Description Reference Timeline
    Multi-center Patient-Level Case Series Collect additional clinical data on the device by acquiring case data healthcare personnel familiar with the device. PMCF_LTHD_241 Q4 2025
    State of the Art Literature Search Identify risks and trends with use of similar devices by reviewing applicable standards, published literature, conference abstracts, guidance documents and recommendations; information relating to the medical condition managed by the device and medical alternatives available for the same target treated population. SAP-HD Q2 2026
    Clinical Evidence Literature Search Identify risks and trends with use of the device by reviewing any clinical data relevant to the device from published literature. LRP-HD Q2 2026
    Global Trial Database Search Identify ongoing clinical trials involving Hemo-Cath® LT catheters. N/A Q2 2026

    No emerging risks, complications or unexpected device failures have been detected from PMCF activities.

    6. Possible Therapeutic Alternatives

    The Kidney Disease Outcomes Quality Initiative (KDOQI) 2019 clinical practice guidelines have been used to support the below recommendations for treatments.

    Therapy Benefits Disadvantages Key Risks
    • AV Fistula
    • Permanent vascular access solution
    • Lower complication rate than hemodialysis via catheter
    • Requires time to mature
    • Patients must sometimes self-cannulate
    • Stenosis
    • Thrombosis
    • Aneurysm
    • Pulmonary hypertension
    • Steal Syndrome
    • Septicemia
    • Hemodialysis Catheter
    • Useful for quick vascular access without AV Fistula in place
    • Can be used as a bridge dialysis method between other therapies
    • Not a permanent solution
    • Catheter dysfunction can disrupt regular treatment
    • Benefit is not equal for all patient populations
    • Post-procedural bleeding
    • Infection
    • Thrombosis
    • Decreased blood flow in dysfunctional catheter
    • Cardiovascular events
    • Fibrin sheath formation around catheter
    • Septicemia
    • Peritoneal Dialysis
    • Less restrictive diet than hemodialysis
    • Does not require hospitalization, can be done in any clean place
    • Clearance of impurities is limited by dialysate flow and peritoneal area
    • Peritonitis
    • Septicemia
    • Fluid overload
    • Kidney Transplant
    • Better quality of life compared to HD
    • Lower risk of death compared to HD
    • Fewer dietary restrictions compared to HD
    • Requires a donor which can take time
    • More risky for certain groups (aged, diabetics, etc.)
    • Patient must take rejection medication for life
    • Rejection medication has side effects
    • Thrombosis
    • Hemorrhage
    • Ureteral blockage
    • Infection
    • Organ rejection
    • Death
    • Myocardial infarction
    • Stroke
    • Comprehensive Conservative Care
    • Less imposed symptom burden than dialysis
    • Preserves life satisfaction
    • May aggravate clinical condition
    • Not designed to treat, but to minimize adverse events
    • Treatment may not actually minimize risks associated with CKD
    • AV Fistula
    • Permanent vascular access solution
    • Lower complication rate than hemodialysis via catheter
    • Requires time to mature
    • Patients must sometimes self-cannulate
    • Stenosis
    • Thrombosis
    • Aneurysm
    • Pulmonary hypertension
    • Steal Syndrome
    • Septicemia
    • Hemodialysis Catheter
    • Useful for quick vascular access without AV Fistula in place
    • Can be used as a bridge dialysis method between other therapies
    • Not a permanent solution
    • Catheter dysfunction can disrupt regular treatment
    • Benefit is not equal for all patient populations
    • Post-procedural bleeding
    • Infection
    • Thrombosis
    • Decreased blood flow in dysfunctional catheter
    • Cardiovascular events
    • Fibrin sheath formation around catheter
    • Septicemia
    • Infusion CVC
    • Capable of multiple infusions
    • Ideal for initiation of extracorporeal therapies
    • Easy access once in place
    • Minimizes repeated venipuncture
    • Increased patient mobility during infusion
    • Easier for outpatient treatment
    • Inability to obtain venous access in emergent situations
    • Requires surgical procedure for placement
    • Risks associated with surgery
    • general anesthesia, etc.
    • Requires maintenance
    • High risk of infection or thrombotic event
    • Implantable Port
    • Decreases puncture wounds/vein damage compared to traditional injection
    • Easier to visualize, palpate, and therefore safer form of IV access
    • Reduces chance for corrosive medications to make skin contact
    • Only one venipuncture for both treatment and lab draw, as opposed to two for traditional IV
    • Longer dwelling time compared to IV
    • Can be permanent, if needed
    • Flow rates vary by device
    • Cosmetically, less displeasing than CVCs
    • Requires surgical procedure, but IV does not
    • Risks associated with surgery
    • general anesthesia, etc.
    • Requires regular flushing
    • Sometimes breast tissue in females- makes access painful and difficult
    • Peripheral Intravenous Catheters (PIVs)
    • Does not require surgical procedure
    • Higher hemolysis rates compared to venipuncture
    • Cannot be used for therapies with blistering agents
    • Four days maximum use
    • Thrombosis
    • Phlebitis
    • Infection
    • AV Fistula
    • Preferred pediatric vascular access route
    • Better solute clearance
    • Lower complication rate than hemodialysis with a catheter
    • Lower risk of infection and thrombosis
    • Technical difficulty in fistula/graft creation in children with small vasculature
    • Not suitable for certain patient size
    • High tendency of vasospasm due to small vessels
    • Primary failure and early access thrombosis
    • Hemodialysis Catheter
    • Great alternative in rapid onset of kidney failure and short period of time until transplantation
    • Ability to be used in the absence of needle cannulation
    • Decreased risk of high output cardiac failure
    • High infection rates
    • High failure/replacement rate
    • Variable blood flow rates leading to potentially poor clearance
    • Potential complications with significant morbidity and mortality
    • Possible Arrhythmia
    • Permanent damage to central venous system (stenosis/thrombosis) may occur
    • Peritoneal Dialysis
    • Most suitable for children due to its almost universal applicability and superior compatibility with lifestyle over other modalities
    • Long-term success is limited by infectious complications and gradual ultrafiltration failure
    • Catheter exit site and tunnel infection
    • Peritonitis
    • Kidney Transplant
    • Enhanced linear growth and potential for remarkable advances in social and intellectual development
    • Graft survival is about 12-15 years in children.
    • Increase in the lifetime risk of cancer for pediatric transplant recipients
    • Size – newborns and infants may not be large enough to receive a transplant. Patients need to be around 8-10 kg in size generally.
    • Infections, post transplant lymphoproliferative disorders and malignancy
    • Graft rejection can be difficult to diagnose.

    7. Suggested Profile and Training for Users

    The catheter should be inserted, manipulated, and removed by a qualified, licensed physician or other qualified health care professional under the direction of a physician. In certain circumstances, patients who may be suitable for home hemodialysis may manipulate the external connections of the catheter. As per guidelines stated from the International Society of Hemodialysis, if home dialysis is recommended, each patient will undergo a thorough training in order to obtain optimal results from home dialysis treatments. The objectives of the training program are to (1) provide the appropriate amount of information to ensure that the patient will be able to dialyze safely at home; (2) enable the patient to monitor and manage other elements of his or her chronic kidney disease, such as obtaining samples for lab work and maintaining appropriate nutrition and diet; and (3) help the patient and his or her care partner(s) cope with barriers and fears associated with home HD During training, the patient will also receive technical education on the operations and maintenance of the water treatment system. During training, the ideal nurse trainer-to-patient ratio is typically 1:1. An idealized schedule of training is created, with weekly areas of focus and training objectives. In practice, however, training is individualized to address any identified learning barriers or risks for failure.

    8. Reference to Any Harmonized Standards and Common Specifications (CS) Applied

    Harmonized Standard or CS Revision Title or Description Level of Compliance
    EN ISO 14971 2019 Medical devices. Application of risk management to medical devices Full
    EN ISO 10555-1 2013+A1:2017 Intravascular catheters. Sterile and single-use catheters. General requirements Full
    EN ISO 10555-3 2013 Intravascular catheters. Sterile and single-use catheters. Central venous catheters Full
    EN ISO 11607-1 2020 Packaging for terminally sterilized medical devices. Requirements for materials, sterile barrier systems and packaging systems Full
    EN ISO 11607-2 2020 Packaging for terminally sterilized medical devices. Validation requirements for forming, sealing and assembly processes Full
    MEDDEV 2.7.1 Rev 4 Clinical Evaluation: A Guide for Manufacturers and Notified Bodies Under Directives 93/42/EEC and 90/385/EEC Full
    EN ISO 10993-1 2020 Biological evaluation of medical devices — Part 1: Evaluation and testing within a risk management process Full
    EN ISO 10993-18 2020 Biological evaluation of medical devices — Part 18: Chemical characterization of medical device materials within a risk management process Full
    EN ISO 10993-7 2008+ A1:2019 Biological evaluation of medical devices — Part 7: Ethylene oxide sterilization residuals — Amendment 1: Applicability of allowable limits for neonates and infants Full
    EN ISO 11135 2014 + A1: 2019 Sterilization of health-care products. Ethylene oxide. Requirements for the development, validation and routine control of a sterilization process for medical devices Full
    ISO 14644-1 2015 Cleanrooms and associated controlled environments — Part 1: Classification of air cleanliness by particle concentration Full
    ISO 14644-2 2015 Cleanrooms and associated controlled environments — Part 2: Monitoring to provide evidence of cleanroom performance related to air cleanliness by particle concentration Full
    EN 556-1 2001 Sterilization of medical devices. Requirements for medical devices to be designated "STERILE". Requirements for terminally sterilized medical devices Full
    EN ISO 11737-1 2018 + A1: 2021 Sterilization of health care products. Microbiological methods. Determination of a population of microorganisms on products Full
    EN ISO 20417 2021 Medical Devices - Information supplied by the manufacturer Full
    EN ISO 15223-1 2021 Medical devices — Symbols to be used with medical device labels, labelling and information to be supplied — Part 1: General requirements Full
    EN ISO 80369-7 2021 Small-bore connectors for liquids and gases in healthcare applications Part 7: Connectors for intravascular or hypodermic applications Full
    EN 62366-1 2015 + A1: 2020 Medical devices — Part 1: Application of usability engineering to medical devices Full
    ASTM D4332-14 2014 Standard Practice for Conditioning Containers, Packages, or Packaging Components for Testing Full
    ASTM D4169-16 2016 Standard Practice for Performance Testing of Shipping Containers and Systems Full
    ASTM F2503-20 2020 Standard Practice for Marking Medical Devices and Other Items for Safety in the Magnetic Resonance Environment Full
    EN ISO 11070 2014+A1:2018 Sterile single-use intravascular introducers, dilators and guidewires Full
    EN ISO 13485 2016 + A11: 2021 Medical Devices – Quality Management system – Requirements for Regulatory Purposes Full
    ISO/TR 20416 2020 Medical devices — Post-market surveillance for manufacturers Full
    MEDDEV 2.12/2 Rev. 2 GUIDELINES ON MEDICAL DEVICES POST MARKET CLINICAL FOLLOW-UP STUDIES A GUIDE FOR MANUFACTURERS AND NOTIFIED BODIES Full
    MDCG 2020-7 2020 Post-market clinical follow-up (PMCF) Plan Template A guide for manufacturers and notified bodies Full
    MDCG 2020-8 2020 Post-market clinical follow-up (PMCF) Evaluation Report Template A guide for manufacturers and notified bodies Full
    MDCG 2019-9 2022 Summary of safety and clinical performance Full
    MDCG-2020-6 2020 Clinical evidence needed for medical devices previously CE marked under Directives 93/42/EEC or 90/385/EEC Full
    EN ISO 14155 2020 Clinical investigation of medical devices for human subjects — Good clinical practice Full
    MDCG 2018-1 Rev. 4 Guidance on BASIC UDI-DI and changes to UDI-DI Full
    EN ISO 11138-1 2017 Sterilization of health care products — Biological indicators Part 1: General requirements Full
    ISO 11138-2 2017 Sterilization of health care products—Biological indicators—Part 2: Biological indicators for ethylene oxide sterilization processes Full
    ISO 11138-7 2019 Sterilization of health care products. Biological indicators - Guidance for the selection, use and interpretation of results Full
    EN ISO 11140-1 2014 Sterilization of health care products — Chemical indicators Part 1: General requirements Full
    EN ISO/IEC 17025 2017 General requirements for the competence of testing and calibration laboratories Full
    Regulation (EU) 2017/745 2017 Regulation (EU) 2017/745 of the European Parliament and of the Council Full

    Revision History

    Revision Date CR# Author Description of Changes Validated
    1 04OCT2021 26535 RS Implementation of SSCP No, this version was not validated by the Notified Body as this is a Class IIa or IIb implantable device
    2 25JUL2022 27030 RS Scheduled Update; updated SSCP in accordance with CER-008_C. In addition, the following elements were added throughout No, this version was not validated by the Notified Body as this is a Class IIa or IIb implantable device
    3 19SEP2022 27292 GM Added additional information to Revision 2 row. Section 8 has been updated to align with the most current harmonized standards and Common Specifications (CS) applied. Quantification of Residual Risks has been updated to align with harm categories in IFU. The total case numbers identified and used for clinical performance evaluation displayed in Section 5 has decreased from 5,506 to 672 on the basis of the exclusion of the following mixed cohort sources of clinical evidence No, this version was not validated by the Notified Body as this is a Class IIa or IIb implantable device
    4 06JUL2023 28266 GM Periodic Update; Updated in Accordance with CER-008, Revision D No, this version was not validated by the Notified Body as this is a Class IIa or IIb implantable device
    5 01JUL2024 29151 GM Periodic Update; Updated in Accordance with CER-008_E No, this version was not validated by the Notified Body as this is a Class IIa or IIb implantable device
    6 31JUL2025 CR# 25-0051 GM Periodic Update; Updated in Accordance with CER-008_F No, this version was not validated by the Notified Body as this is a Class IIa or IIb implantable device

    Version 5.00 of Medical Components, Inc. Template QA-CL-200-1