Device Description
Device Name: Duo-Flow® Catheter
Description of Device: The Duo-Flow® Catheter
removes and returns blood through two segregated lumen passages.
Each lumen is connected to an extension line with color-coded
female luer connectors. The transition between lumen and extension
is housed within a molded hub. Both arterial and venous lumens
contain side-holes. The catheter incorporates Barium Sulphate to
facilitate visualization under fluoroscopy or Xray. The catheter
has been tested at flow rates of up to 400 mL/min (9F Straight),
300ml/min (9F & 11F IJ), 450ml/min (11.5F Straight). The
catheter is available with a straight or pre- curved lumen in a
variety of French sizes and lengths to accommodate physician
preference and clinical needs. The pre-curved devices are not
suitable for femoral insertion.
Device Name: Duo-Jet® Catheter Nikkiso Duo-Flow®
Catheter
Description of Device: The Duo-Jet® Catheter
removes and returns blood through two segregated lumen passages.
Each lumen is connected to an extension line with color- coded
female luer connectors. The transition between lumen and extension
is housed within a molded hub. Both arterial and venous lumens
contain side-holes. The catheter incorporates Barium Sulphate to
facilitate visualization under fluoroscopy or Xray. The catheter
has been tested at flow rates of up to 300ml/min (11.5F Straight)
and 400 mL/min (9F Straight & 11.5F IJ). The catheter is
available with a straight or pre-curved lumen in a variety of
French sizes and lengths to accommodate physician preference and
clinical needs. The pre-curved devices are not suitable for
femoral insertion. Nikkiso Duo-Flow® Catheter The Nikkiso
Duo-Flow® Catheter removes and returns blood through two
segregated lumen passages. Each lumen is connected to an extension
line with color-coded female luer connectors. The transition
between lumen and extension is housed within a molded hub. Both
arterial and venous lumens contain side-holes. The catheter
incorporates Barium Sulphate to facilitate visualization under
fluoroscopy or Xray. The catheter has been tested at flow rates of
up to 400 mL/min.
Materials / Substances in Contact with Patient Tissue:
The percentage ranges in the table below are based on the weight
of the 11.5F X 12cm (10.21g) and 11.5F X 24cm (11.75g) Duo-Flow
catheters.
11.5F Duo-Flow
| Material |
% Weight (w/w) |
| Polyurethane |
42.96-47.81 |
| Acetal co-polymer |
20.40 - 23.47 |
| PVC |
15.83-18.22 |
| ABS |
6.25 -7.20 |
| Vythene |
5.04 -5.80 |
| Barium sulfate |
2.35-4.66 |
The percentage ranges in the table below are based on the weight
of the 9F X 12cm (9.81g) and 9F X 20cm (10.41g) Duo-Flow
catheters.
9F Duo-Flow
| Material |
% Weight (w/w) |
| Polyurethane |
41.56-43.79 |
| Acetal co-polymer |
23.02 - 24.43 |
| PVC |
17.86-18.96 |
| ABS |
7.06 -7.49 |
| Vythene |
5.69-6.04 |
| Barium sulfate |
1.51-2.59 |
Note:Per the instructions for use, the device is contraindicated
for patients with known or suspected allergies to the above
materials.
Information on Medicinal Substances in the Device:
N/A
How the Device Achieves its Intended Mode of Action:
Hemodialysis catheters are centrally placed access tubes. A
typical hemodialysis catheter uses a thin, flexible tube. The tube
has two openings. The tube goes into a large vein. The vein is
usually the internal jugular vein. Blood withdraws through one
lumen of the catheter. The blood flows to the dialysis machine
through a separate tubing set. The blood is then processed and
filtered. The blood returns to the patient through the second
lumen. This device is used when dialysis must start at once.
Patients may not have a functioning AV fistula or graft. Catheter
hemodialysis normally happens on a short-term basis.
Sterilization Information: Contents sterile and
non-pyrogenic in unopened, undamaged package. Sterilized by
Ethylene Oxide.
Previous Generations / Variants:
| Name of Previous Generation |
Differences from Current Device |
| N/A |
N/A |
Accessories Intended for Use in Combination with the
Device:
| Name of Accessory |
Description of Accessory |
| Guidewire |
For general intravascular use to facilitate the selective
placement of medical devices in the vessel anatomy.
|
| Guidewire Advancer |
Aid for introduction of guidewire into target vein.
|
| Introducer Needle |
Used for the percutaneous introduction of guidewires.
|
| Scalpel |
A cutting device during surgical, pathology and minor
medical procedures
|
| Dilator |
Designed for percutaneous entry into a vessel in order to
enlarge the opening of the vessel for the placement of a
catheter in a vein.
|
| End Cap |
To keep clean and protect catheter luer between treatments.
|
| Syringe |
Attached to introducer needle to help capture blood return
once introducer needle perforates targeted vein, prevent air
embolism
|
Other Devices or Products Intended for Use in Combination with
the Device:
| Name of Device or Product |
Description of Device or Product |
| N/A |
N/A |
Summary of Clinical Evaluation and Post-Market Clinical Follow-Up
(PMCF)
Summary of Clinical Data Related to Subject Device
Specific Case Numbers (Mixed Cohort Case Numbers) Identified and
Used for Clinical Performance Evaluation
| Product Family |
Clinical Literature |
PMCF Data |
Total Cases |
User Survey Responses |
| Clinical Literature |
460 (& 45 Mixed Cohort Cases) |
29 |
489 (& 45 Mixed Cohort Cases) |
0 |
Clinical performance was measured using parameters including but
not limited to dwell time, catheter insertion outcomes, and
adverse event rates. Critical clinical parameters extracted from
these studies met standards set forth in the guidelines for the
State of the Art. There were no unforeseen adverse events or other
high occurrences of adverse events detected in any of the clinical
activities. Medcomp® STHD catheters are subjected to, and must
pass, simulated use testing intended to replicate 30 days use as
part of device development. The Duo-Flow® Catheter passed this
testing. Clinical guidelines recommend to limit the use of
temporary, noncuffed, nontunneled dialysis catheters to a maximum
of 2 weeks (KDOQI 2019), however, duration of use of these
catheters has varied in available clinical evidence identified by
the manufacturer to date. Although Medcomp® catheters materials
contain non-degradable polymers, fully functional catheters may be
removed for other reasons, such as intractable infection or change
of therapy. Published clinical literature does not always focus on
the physical lifetime of a catheter for these reasons. In the case
of the Duo-Flow® Catheter, post market clinical follow- up
activities and published literature have found mean durations of
use ranging from 2 days to 4.53 months reported to date. Based on
this information, the Duo-Flow® catheters have a 30 day lifetime;
however, the decision to remove and/or replace the catheter should
be based on clinical performance and need, and not any
predetermined point in time.
Summary of Clinical Data Related to the Equivalent Device
Clinical evidence from published literature and PMCF activities
has been generated specific to known and unknown variants of the
subject device. The equivalency rationale in the updated clinical
evaluation report will demonstrate that the clinical evidence
available for these variants is representative of the range of
device variants in the device family. Variants Relying on
Equivalence:\n• 11.5F x 12cm and 24cm Straight Duo-Flow®
Catheters\n• 11.5F x 12cm and 13.5cm Pre-Curved Duo-Flow®
Catheters\n• 11.5F x 12cm, 15cm, and 20cm Pre-Curved Duo-Flow®
Catheters w/ 2 Suture Wings\n• 9F x 15cm and 20cm Straight
Duo-Flow® Catheters\n• 9F x 12cm, 15cm, and 20cm Pre-Curved
Duo-Flow® Catheters\nVariants Contributing Clinical Data:\n•
Duo-Flow® (Unknown Variant)\n• 11.5F x 15cm and 20cm Straight
Duo-Flow® Catheters\n• 11.5F x 15cm and 20cm Pre-Curved Duo-Flow®
Catheters\n• 11.5F x 15cm Raulerson IJ Duo-Flow® Catheter\n• 9F x
12cm Straight Duo-Flow® Catheter\nThere are no clinical or
biological differences between variants within the subject device
family, and the potential impact of the technical differences will
be rationalized in the updated clinical evaluation report.
Summary of Clinical Data from Pre-Market Investigations (if
applicable)
No pre-market clinical devices were used for the device's clinical
evaluation.
Summary of Clinical Data from Other Sources
Source
Summary of Published Literature:Thirteen published literature
articles representing 460 device family specific cases and 45
mixed cohort cases inclusive of the Duo-Flow® device family have
been sourced by the manufacturer to date. The articles include
five randomized controlled trials (Weijmer et al., 2008, Weijmer
et. al., 2005, and Kukavica et al., 2009, Masolitin et al., 2022,
Ratanarat et al., 2023), four prospective studies (Bingol et al.,
2007, Elaldi et. al., 2001, Sramek et al., 2002, Baird et al.,
2010), three retrospective studies (Demirkilic et. al., 2004,
Haller et. al., 2009, Novak et. al., 1997), and one case study
(Ekinci et al., 2018). Bibliography: Bingol H, Akay HT, Iyem H et
al. Prophylactic dialysis in elderly patients undergoing coronary
bypass surgery. Therapeutic apheresis and dialysis : official
peer-reviewed journal of the International Society for Apheresis,
the Japanese Society for Apheresis, the Japanese Society for
Dialysis Therapy. 2007;11(1):30-5. Weijmer MC, Vervloet MG, ter
Wee PM. Prospective follow-up of a novel design haemodialysis
catheter; lower infection rates and improved survival. Nephrology,
dialysis, transplantation : official publication of the European
Dialysis and Transplant Association - European Renal Association.
2008;23(3):977-83. Demirkilic U, Kuralay E, Yenicesu M et al.
Timing of replacement therapy for acute renal failure after
cardiac surgery. Journal of cardiac surgery. 2004;19(1):17-20.
Weijmer MC, Dorpel MAVD. Randomized, clinical trial comparison of
trisodium citrate 30% and heparin as catheter-locking solution in
hemodialysis patients. Journal of the American Society of
Nephrology : JASN. 2005. Elaldi N, Bakir M, DÖKmetaŞ İ. Rapid
diagnosis of catheter related sepsis in hemodialysis patients.
Microbiology. 2000. Haller C, Deglise S, Saucy F et al. Placement
of hemodialysis catheters through stenotic or occluded central
thoracic veins. Cardiovascular and interventional radiology.
2009;32(4):695-702. Kukavica N, Resić H, Šahović V. Comparison of
complications and dialysis adequacy between temporary and
permanent tunnelled catheter for haemodialysis. Bosnian journal of
basic medical sciences. 2009. Novak I, Sramek V, Pittrova H et al.
Glutamine and other amino acid losses during continuous venovenous
hemodiafiltration. Artificial organs. 1997;21(5):359-63. Šrámek V,
Rokyta R, Matìjoviè M et al. Impact of continuous veno-venous
hemodiafiltration on gastric mucosal carbon dioxide
concentrations. Clinical Intensive Care. 2011;13(1):33-8. Baird
JS. The sieving coefficient and clearance of vasopressin during
continuous renal replacement therapy in critically ill children.
Journal of critical care. 2010;25(4):591-4. Masolitin S, Protsenko
D, Tyurin I, Mamontova O, Magomedov M, Kim T, Yaralyan A. The use
of selective hemoperfusion in the treatment of toxic
rhabdomyolysis complicated by acute kidney damage. Bulletin of
Anesthesiology and Resuscitation. 2022;19(1). Ekinci F, Yildizdaş
R, Horoz Öz, Alabaz D, Tolunay İ, Petmezci E. Treatment of severe
leptospirosis with therapeutic plasma exchange in a pediatric
patient. Turkish Journal of Pediatrics. 2018;60(5). Ratanarat, R.,
Phairatwet, P., Khansompop, S., & Naorungroj, T. (2023).
Customized Citrate Anticoagulation versus No Anticoagulant in
Continuous Venovenous Hemofiltration in Critically Ill Patients
with Acute Kidney Injury: A Prospective Randomized Controlled
Trial. Blood Purification, 52(5), 455-463.
Source
PMCF_Medcomp_211:The Medcomp User Survey acquired responses from
healthcare personnel familiar with any number of Medcomp’s product
offerings. 20 respondents responded that they or their facility
have used Medcomp short-term hemodialysis catheters, with 0 of
those respondents using the Duo-Flow® device. There were no
differences in mean user sentiments within short-term hemodialysis
catheters across State of the Art Performance and Safety Outcome
Measures or between device types relating to safety or
performance. The following data points were collected from users
of Medcomp short-term hemodialysis catheters (n=20): • (Mean
Likert Scale Response) Catheters function as intended – 4.8 / 5 •
(Mean Likert Scale Response) Packaging allows for aseptic
presentation – 4.9/5 • (Mean Likert Scale Response) Benefit
outweighs the risk – 4.7 / 5 • Dwell Time (n=19) – 15.74 days
(95%CI: 6.3 – 25.1)
Source
PMCF_STHD_211 (Retrospective Patient-Level Usage Data Survey):The
Short-Term Hemodialysis (STHD) Product Line Data Collection Survey
aimed to assess safety and performance outcome information for all
variants of Medcomp STHD catheters. 19 survey responses were
collected from 10 countries representing 381 device cases. 15
Duo-Flow® cases inclusive of several variant devices were
collected. All cases were described as 11.5F and Pre-Curved, with
representation of 15cm and 20cm length catheters. The following
outcome measures were confirmed to be within State of the Art
safety and performance outcome measures from published literature
for Medcomp Duo-Flow® devices: • Dwell Time – 53.53 Days (95%CI:
40.27 – 66.80) • Procedural Outcomes – 100% • Catheter Related
Blood Stream Infection – 1.24 per 1,000 catheter days (95%CI: 0 –
3.69) • Catheter Associated Venous Thrombus – 1.24 per 1,000
catheter days (95%CI: 0 – 3.69) • Exit Site Infection – 1.24 per
1,000 catheter days (95%CI: 0 – 3.69)
Source
PMCF_DLOCK_211 (Retrospective Database Analysis):The Netherlands
2021A data report is intended to assess safety and performance
outcome information from collected data on Medcomp Long-Term
Hemodialysis Catheters, Short-Term Hemodialysis Catheters, and
30.0% Duralock-C Locking Solution for use in EU MDR clinical
evaluation. These outcome measures include dwell time, reasons for
removal, exit site infection rates, catheter related blood stream
infection (CRBSI) rates, and catheter associated venous thrombosis
(CAVT) rates. Product family identification information was also
included in the collected data. The dataset was provided by Marcel
C. Weijmer, MD, PhD the head of the Department of Internal
Medicine and Nephrology at OLVG located in Amsterdam, Netherlands.
The dataset is comprised of consecutive cases from January 2010 to
October 2019. The dataset was obtained 26 February 2021 and copied
into a password protected un-editable format per QA-CL-400. 4
Duo-Flow® cases, described as 11.5F and Pre-Curved, were
collected. The following outcome measures were collected for
Medcomp Duo-Flow® devices: • Dwell Time – 28 days (Range: 6 – 64
days) • Catheter Related Blood Stream Infection – 2 Events
Reported • Catheter Associated Venous Thrombus – 4 Events Reported
• Exit Site Infection – No Events Reported
Source
PMCF_Infusion_211 (Retrospective Patient-Level Usage Data
Survey):The Infusion Product Line Data Collection Survey aimed to
assess safety and performance outcome information for all variants
of Medcomp Infusion Ports, PICCs, Midlines, and CVCs. 70 survey
responses were collected from 17 countries representing 471 device
cases. 4 Duo-Flow® cases inclusive of several variant devices
across French size (9F, 11.5F) and length (12cm, 15cm, 20cm) were
collected. The following outcome measures were collected for
Medcomp Duo-Flow® devices: • Dwell Time – 28 days (Range: 6 – 64
days) • Procedural Outcomes - 100% • Catheter Related Blood Stream
Infection – No Events Reported • Catheter Associated Venous
Thrombus – No Events Reported • Exit Site Infection – No Events
Reported
Source
PMCF_STHD_242 (Short-Term Hemodialysis Truveta Data Analysis):The
Short-Term Hemodialysis (STHD) Truveta data analysis assessed
safety and performance outcome information for Medcomp® and
competitor devices present in Truveta Studio. Truveta data comes
from a growing collective of more than 30 health systems that
provide 17% of the daily clinical care across all 50 U.S. states
from 800 hospitals and 20,000 clinics, representing the full
diversity of the United States. The population used for data
analysis was derived utilizing Truveta Studio’s proprietary coding
language (Prose) and unique device identifier (UDI) codes
representing all saleable Medcomp® STHD devices and STHD devices
distributed and/or manufactured by other companies. 6 Duo-Flow®
cases inclusive of several variant devices were collected. Cases
were described as 11.5F and Pre-Curved Cases included multiple
French sizes (9F, 11.5F), configurations (straight, pre-curved),
and lengths (12cm, 15cm, 20cm). The following State of the Art
safety and performance outcome measures were observed for Medcomp
Duo-Flow® devices: • Catheter Related Blood Stream Infection –
23.81 per 1,000 catheter days (95%CI: 2.88 - 86.01) • Catheter
Associated Venous Thrombus – 0 per 1,000 catheter days (95%CI: 0 –
43.92) • Exit Site Infection – 0 per 1,000 catheter days (95%CI: 0
– 43.92) The catheter brand logistic regression model did not find
that any Medcomp® catheter brands were statistically significantly
associated with the incidence of CRBSI. The brand agnostic
logistic regression found that Triple Lumen catheters OR: 1.63
(95%CI: 1.17 – 2.28) (as compared to the reference category of
Double Lumen catheters) and Pre-Curved catheters OR: 7.26 (95%CI:
1.32 – 32.69) (as compared to the reference category of straight
catheters) were statistically significantly associated with the
incidence of CRBSI.
Overall Summary of Clinical Safety and Performance
Upon review of the Duo-Flow® catheter data across all sources, it
is possible to conclude that the benefits of the subject device
outweigh the overall and individual risks when the device is used
as intended by the manufacturer. It is the manufacturer’s and
clinical expert evaluator’s opinion that activities both complete
and ongoing are sufficient to support the safety, efficacy, and
acceptable benefit/risk profile of the subject devices.
| Outcome |
Benefit/Risk Acceptability Criteria |
Desired Trend |
Clinical Literature (Subject Device) |
PMCF Data (Subject Device) |
| Performance Outcomes |
| Dwell Time |
Greater than 8 days |
+
|
2 days - 4.53 months (Summary of Published Literature)
|
53.53 days (PMCF_STHD_211) 28 days (PMCF_DLOCK_211)
|
| Procedural Outcomes |
Greater than 95% |
+
|
100% (Summary of Published Literature)
|
100% (PMCF_STHD_211
PMCF_Infusion_211)
|
| Safety Outcomes |
|
Catheter Related Blood Stream Infection (CRBSI)
|
Less than 7.8 incidents of CRBSI per 1,000 catheter days
|
-
|
0 - 3.9 per 1
000 catheter days (Summary of Published Literature)
|
1.24 per 1
000 catheter days (PMCF_STHD_211) No Events Reported
(PMCF_Infusion_211) 2 Events Reported (PMCF_DLOCK_211) 2
Events Reported (PMCF_STHD_242)
|
| Exit Site Infection Rate |
Less than 3.5 incidents of exit site infection per 1,000
catheter days
|
-
|
0 - 5.3 per 1
000 catheter days (Summary of Published Literature)
|
1.24 per 1
000 catheter days (PMCF_STHD_211) No Events Reported
(PMCF_Infusion_211)
|
|
Catheter Associated Venous Thrombus (CAVT)
|
Less than 11.4 incidents of CAVT per 1,000 catheter days
|
+
|
4.3 - 7.2 per 1
000 catheter days (Summary of Published Literature)
|
1.24 per 1
000 catheter days (PMCF_STHD_211) No Events Reported
(PMCF_Infusion_211 & PMCF_STHD_242) 4 Events Reported
(PMCF_DLOCK_211)
|
*ND indicates no data on the clinical data parameter:
**PMCF_Medcomp_211 asked respondents, if they agreed on a scale
of 1 -5, that their experience in relation to each outcome was the
same or better than the benefit/risk acceptability criteria.:
***The Practical Peritoneal Dialysis Study does not censor dwell
time for reasons that would not be indicative of catheter
performance, or include complete dwell time for catheters that
remained implanted at the time of data collection. For these
reasons, Medcomp does not believe this number is not aligned with
the benefit/risk acceptability criteria.:
*Complaint data may be associated with significant
under-reporting
On-going or Planned Post-Market Clinical Follow-Up (PMCF)
| Activity |
Description |
Reference |
Timeline |
| Multicenter Patient-Level Case Series |
Collect additional clinical data on the device
|
PMCF_STHD_241 |
Q4 2025 |
| State of the Art Literature Search |
Identify risks and trends with use of dialysis catheters
|
SAP-HD |
Q1 2025 |
| Clinical Evidence Literature Search |
Identify risks and trends with use of the device
|
LRP-STHD |
Q3 2025 |
| Global Trial Database Search |
Identify ongoing clinical trials involving the devices
|
N/A |
Q3 2025 |
No emerging risks, complications or unexpected device failures
have been detected from PMCF activities.