Summary of Safety and Clinical Performance

Duo-Flow® Catheter

SSCP Document Number: SSCP-020
Revision Number: 4
Revision Date: 16-Sep-24

Important Information

This Summary of Safety and Clinical Performance (SSCP) is intended to provide public access to an updated summary of the main aspects of the safety and clinical performance of the device. This SSCP is not intended to replace the Instructions for Use as the main document to ensure the safe use of the device, nor is it intended to provide diagnostic or therapeutic suggestions to intended users or patients.

Applicable Documents

Document Type Document Title / Number
Design History File (DHF) 17006, 11027
‘MDR Documentation’ File Number TD-020

Device Identification and General Information

Device Trade Name(s): Duo-Flow® Catheter

Manufacturer Name and Address: Medical Components, Inc. 1499 Delp Drive Harleysville, PA 19438 USA

Manufacturer Single Registration Number (SRN): US-MF-000008230

Basic UDI-DI: 00884908294NN

Medical Device Nomenclature: F900201 – Temporary Hemodialysis Catheters and Kits

Class of Device: III

Date First CE Certificate Issued: 1-Mar

Authorized Representative Name and SRN: Gerhard Frömel European Regulatory Expert Medical Product Service GmbH (MPS) Borngasse 20 35619 Braunfels, Germany SRN: DE-AR-000005009

Notified Body Name and Single Identification Number: BSI Netherlands NB2797

Device Grouping and Variants

The devices in scope of this document are all The devices in scope of this document are all short-term hemodialysis catheter sets. The device part numbers are organized into variant categories. These devices are distributed as procedure trays, in various configurations inclusive of accessories and adjunctive devices (see section “Accessories intended for use in combination with the Device”).. The device part numbers are organized into variant categories. These devices are distributed as procedure trays, in various configurations inclusive of accessories and adjunctive devices (see section "Accessories intended for use in combination with the Device").

Variant Devices:

Variant Devices:
Variant Description Part Number(s) Explanation of Multiple Part Numbers
11.5F x 12cm Raulerson IJ Duo-Flow 1072
11.5F x 12cm Pre-Curved Duo-Flow w/ 2 Suture Wings 1365
11.5F x 12cm Straight Duo-Flow 1020
11.5F x 13.5cm Raulerson IJ Duo-Flow 10541
11.5F x 15cm Pre-Curved Duo-Flow 1316
11.5F x 15cm Pre-Curved Duo-Flow w/ 2 Suture Wings 1362
11.5F x 15cm Raulerson IJ Duo-Flow 1073 1880-815-405 No significant clinical, biological, or technical difference (only difference is branding)
11.5F x 15cm Straight Duo-Flow 1021 1879-815-405 No significant clinical, biological, or technical difference (only difference is branding)
11.5F x 20cm Raulerson IJ Duo-Flow 1074 1880-820-405 No significant clinical, biological, or technical difference (only difference is branding)
11.5F x 20cm Pre-Curved Duo-Flow w/ 2 Suture Wings 1363
11.5F x 20cm Straight Duo-Flow 1022 1879-820-405 No significant clinical, biological, or technical difference (only difference is branding)
11.5F x 24cm Straight Duo-Flow 1023 1879-824-405 No significant clinical, biological, or technical difference (only difference is branding)
9F x 12cm Pre-Curved Duo-Flow 1336
9F x 12cm Straight Duo-Flow 1064 1358 No significant clinical, biological, or technical difference (only difference is branding)
9F x 15cm Pre-Curved Duo-Flow 1337
9F x 15cm Straight Duo-Flow 1065 1353 No significant clinical, biological, or technical difference (only difference is branding)
9F x 20cm Pre-Curved Duo-Flow 1338
9F x 20cm Straight Duo-Flow 1066 1357 No significant clinical, biological, or technical difference (only difference is branding)

Procedure Trays:

Procedure Trays:
Catalog Code Part Number Description
XTP114CT 1020 11.5F X 12cm Duo-Flow® Double Lumen Hemodialysis Catheter Only Set
XTP114IJC 1072 11.5F X 12cm Duo-Flow® Double Lumen IJ Hemodialysis Catheter Only Set
XTP116CT 1021 11.5F X 15cm Duo-Flow® Double Lumen Hemodialysis Catheter Only Set
XTP116IJC 1073 11.5F X 15cm Duo-Flow® Double Lumen IJ Hemodialysis Catheter Only Set
XTP118CT 1022 11.5F X 20cm Duo-Flow® Double Lumen Hemodialysis Catheter Only Set
XTP118IJC 1074 11.5F X 20cm Duo-Flow® Double Lumen IJ Hemodialysis Catheter Only Set
XTP119CT 1023 11.5F X 24cm Duo-Flow® Double Lumen Hemodialysis Catheter Only Set
DJIJ116 1880-815-405 11.5F X 15cm Duo-Jet® Double Lumen IJ Hemodialysis Catheter Basic Set
DJIJ118 1880-820-405 11.5F X 20cm Duo-Jet® Double Lumen IJ Hemodialysis Catheter Basic Set
DJST116 1879-815-405 11.5F X 15cm Duo-Jet® Double Lumen Hemodialysis Catheter Basic Set
DJST118 1879-820-405 11.5F X 20cm Duo-Jet® Double Lumen Hemodialysis Catheter Basic Set
DJST119 1879-824-405 11.5F X 24cm Duo-Jet® Double Lumen Hemodialysis Catheter Basic Set
DJST912 1358 9F X 12cm Duo-Jet® Double Lumen Hemodialysis Catheter Basic Set
DJST915 1353 9F X 15cm Duo-Jet® Double Lumen Hemodialysis Catheter Basic Set
DJST920 1357 9F X 20cm Duo-Jet® Double Lumen Hemodialysis Catheter Basic Set
DL11/24 1023 11.5Fx24cm Nikkiso Duo-Flow® Double Lumen Hemodialysis Catheter Basic Set
XTP114IJS-2 1365 11.5F X 12cm Duo-Flow® Double Lumen Pre-Curved Hemodialysis Catheter W/Dual Suture Wing Basic Set
XTP114IJSE 1072 11.5F X 12cm Duo-Flow® Double Lumen IJ Hemodialysis Catheter Basic Set
XTP114MTE 1020 11.5F X 12cm Duo-Flow® Double Lumen Hemodialysis Catheter Basic Set
XTP115IJSE 10541 11.5 X 13.5cm Duo-Flow® Double Lumen IJ Hemodialysis Catheter Basic Set
XTP116IJS-1 1316 11.5F X 15cm Duo-Flow® Double Lumen Pre-Curved Hemodialysis Catheter Basic Set
XTP116IJS-2 1362 11.5F X 15cm Duo-Flow® Double Lumen Pre-Curved Hemodialysis Catheter W/Dual Suture Wing Basic Set
XTP116IJSE 1073 11.5F X 15cm Duo-Flow® Double Lumen IJ Hemodialysis Catheter Basic Set
XTP116MTE 1021 11.5F X 15cm Duo-Flow® Double Lumen Hemodialysis Catheter Basic Set
XTP118IJS-2 1363 11.5F X 20cm Duo-Flow® Double Lumen Pre-Curved Hemodialysis Catheter W/Dual Suture Wing Basic Set
XTP118IJSE 1074 11.5F X 20cm Duo-Flow® Double Lumen IJ Hemodialysis Catheter Basic Set
XTP118MTE 1022 11.5F X 20cm Duo-Flow® Double Lumen Hemodialysis Catheter Basic Set
XTP119MTE 1023 11.5F X 24cm Duo-Flow® Double Lumen Hemodialysis Catheter Basic Set
XTP94IJS 1336 9F X 12cm Duo-Flow® Double Lumen IJ Hemodialysis Catheter Basic Set
XTP94MT 1064 9F X 12cm Duo-Flow® Double Lumen Hemodialysis Catheter Basic Set
XTP96IJS 1337 9F X 15cm Duo-Flow® Double Lumen IJ Hemodialysis Catheter Basic Set
XTP96MT 1065 9F X 15cm Duo-Flow® Double Lumen Hemodialysis Catheter Basic Set
XTP98IJS 1338 9F X 20cm Duo-Flow® Double Lumen IJ Hemodialysis Catheter Basic Set
XTP98MT 1066 9F X 20cm Duo-Flow® Double Lumen Hemodialysis Catheter Basic Set

Configurations of Procedure Trays:

Configuration Type Kit Components
Duo-Flow® Catheter Only Set (1) Catheter (1) Dilator (2) End Cap
Duo-Flow® Basic Set (1) Catheter (1) Guidewire (1) Guidewire Advancer (1) Needle (1) Scalpel (1) Dilator (2) End Cap

Intended Use of the Device

Intended Purpose: The Duo-Flow® Catheters are intended for use in adult patients with Acute Kidney Injury (AKI) or Chronic Kidney Disease (CKD) for whom immediate central venous vascular access for short-term hemodialysis is deemed necessary based on the direction of a qualified, licensed physician. The catheter is intended to be used under the regular review and assessment of qualified health professionals. This catheter is for Single Use Only.

Indication(s): The Duo-Flow® Catheter is indicated for short-term use where vascular access is required for less than 14 days for the purpose of hemodialysis.

Target Population(s): Duo-Flow® catheters are intended for use in adult patients with Acute Kidney Injury (AKI) or Chronic Kidney Disease (CKD) for whom immediate central venous vascular access for short-term hemodialysis is deemed necessary based on the direction of a qualified, licensed physician. The catheter is not intended for use in pediatric patients.

Contraindications and/or Limitations:

  • Known or suspected allergies to any of the components of the catheter or the kit. • This device is contraindicated for patients exhibiting severe, uncontrolled coagulopathy or thrombocytopenia.

Device Description

Device Image

Device Name: Duo-Flow® Catheter

Description of Device: The Duo-Flow® Catheter removes and returns blood through two segregated lumen passages. Each lumen is connected to an extension line with color-coded female luer connectors. The transition between lumen and extension is housed within a molded hub. Both arterial and venous lumens contain side-holes. The catheter incorporates Barium Sulphate to facilitate visualization under fluoroscopy or Xray. The catheter has been tested at flow rates of up to 400 mL/min (9F Straight), 300ml/min (9F & 11F IJ), 450ml/min (11.5F Straight). The catheter is available with a straight or pre- curved lumen in a variety of French sizes and lengths to accommodate physician preference and clinical needs. The pre-curved devices are not suitable for femoral insertion.

Device Image

Device Name: Duo-Jet® Catheter Nikkiso Duo-Flow® Catheter

Description of Device: The Duo-Jet® Catheter removes and returns blood through two segregated lumen passages. Each lumen is connected to an extension line with color- coded female luer connectors. The transition between lumen and extension is housed within a molded hub. Both arterial and venous lumens contain side-holes. The catheter incorporates Barium Sulphate to facilitate visualization under fluoroscopy or Xray. The catheter has been tested at flow rates of up to 300ml/min (11.5F Straight) and 400 mL/min (9F Straight & 11.5F IJ). The catheter is available with a straight or pre-curved lumen in a variety of French sizes and lengths to accommodate physician preference and clinical needs. The pre-curved devices are not suitable for femoral insertion. Nikkiso Duo-Flow® Catheter The Nikkiso Duo-Flow® Catheter removes and returns blood through two segregated lumen passages. Each lumen is connected to an extension line with color-coded female luer connectors. The transition between lumen and extension is housed within a molded hub. Both arterial and venous lumens contain side-holes. The catheter incorporates Barium Sulphate to facilitate visualization under fluoroscopy or Xray. The catheter has been tested at flow rates of up to 400 mL/min.

Materials / Substances in Contact with Patient Tissue:

The percentage ranges in the table below are based on the weight of the 11.5F X 12cm (10.21g) and 11.5F X 24cm (11.75g) Duo-Flow catheters.

11.5F Duo-Flow
Material % Weight (w/w)
Polyurethane 42.96-47.81
Acetal co-polymer 20.40 - 23.47
PVC 15.83-18.22
ABS 6.25 -7.20
Vythene 5.04 -5.80
Barium sulfate 2.35-4.66

The percentage ranges in the table below are based on the weight of the 9F X 12cm (9.81g) and 9F X 20cm (10.41g) Duo-Flow catheters.

9F Duo-Flow
Material % Weight (w/w)
Polyurethane 41.56-43.79
Acetal co-polymer 23.02 - 24.43
PVC 17.86-18.96
ABS 7.06 -7.49
Vythene 5.69-6.04
Barium sulfate 1.51-2.59

Note:Per the instructions for use, the device is contraindicated for patients with known or suspected allergies to the above materials.

Information on Medicinal Substances in the Device: N/A

How the Device Achieves its Intended Mode of Action: Hemodialysis catheters are centrally placed access tubes. A typical hemodialysis catheter uses a thin, flexible tube. The tube has two openings. The tube goes into a large vein. The vein is usually the internal jugular vein. Blood withdraws through one lumen of the catheter. The blood flows to the dialysis machine through a separate tubing set. The blood is then processed and filtered. The blood returns to the patient through the second lumen. This device is used when dialysis must start at once. Patients may not have a functioning AV fistula or graft. Catheter hemodialysis normally happens on a short-term basis.

Sterilization Information: Contents sterile and non-pyrogenic in unopened, undamaged package. Sterilized by Ethylene Oxide.

Previous Generations / Variants:

Name of Previous Generation Differences from Current Device
N/A N/A

Accessories Intended for Use in Combination with the Device:

Name of Accessory Description of Accessory
Guidewire For general intravascular use to facilitate the selective placement of medical devices in the vessel anatomy.
Guidewire Advancer Aid for introduction of guidewire into target vein.
Introducer Needle Used for the percutaneous introduction of guidewires.
Scalpel A cutting device during surgical, pathology and minor medical procedures
Dilator Designed for percutaneous entry into a vessel in order to enlarge the opening of the vessel for the placement of a catheter in a vein.
End Cap To keep clean and protect catheter luer between treatments.
Syringe Attached to introducer needle to help capture blood return once introducer needle perforates targeted vein, prevent air embolism

Other Devices or Products Intended for Use in Combination with the Device:

Name of Device or Product Description of Device or Product
N/A N/A

Risks and Warnings

Residual Risks and Undesirable Effects: All surgical procedures carry risk. Medcomp® has implemented risk management processes to proactively find and mitigate these risks as far as possible without adversely affecting the benefit-risk profile of the device. After mitigation, residual risks and the possibility of adverse events from use of this product remain. Medcomp® has determined that all residual risks are acceptable when considered with respect to the expected clinical benefits of the Duo-Flow® Catheter and the benefits of other similar hemodialysis devices.

Residual Harm Type Possible Adverse Events Associated with Harm
Allergic Reaction Allergic Reaction Intolerance Reaction to Implanted Device
Bleeding Bleeding (May be severe) Exsanguination Femoral Artery Bleed Hematoma Hemorrhage Retroperitoneal Bleed
Cardiac Event Cardiac Arrhythmia Cardiac Tamponade
Embolism Air Embolus
Infection Bacteremia Endocarditis Exit Site Infection Septicemia
Perforation Inferior Vena Cava Puncture Laceration of the Vessel Perforation of the Vessel Pneumothorax Right Atrial Puncture Subclavian Artery Puncture Superior Vena Cava Puncture
Stenosis Venous Stenosis
Tissue Injury Brachial Plexus Injury Exit Site Necrosis Mediastinal Injury Pleural Injury
Thrombosis Central Venous Thrombosis Lumen Thrombosis Subclavian Vein Thrombosis Vascular Thrombosis
Miscellaneous Complications Catheter Dysfunction Femoral Nerve Damage Hemothorax Malposition Thoracic Duct Laceration
Quantification of Residual Risks
PMS Complaints (01 January 2017 – 31 December 2023) PMCF Events
Units Sold: 245,146 Units Studied: 29
Patient Residual Harm Category % of Devices % of Devices
Allergic Reaction Not Reported Not Reported
Bleeding 0.0004% Not Reported
Cardiac Event Not Reported Not Reported
Embolism Not Reported Not Reported
Infection Not Reported 20.69%
Perforation Not Reported Not Reported
Stenosis Not Reported Not Reported
Tissue Injury Not Reported Not Reported
Thrombosis Not Reported 10.34%

Warnings and Precautions:

Warnings listed for the Duo-Flow® Catheter are as follows:

  • Do not insert catheter in thrombosed vessels. • Do not advance the guidewire or catheter if unusual resistance is encountered. • Do not insert or withdraw the guidewire forcibly from any component. If the guidewire becomes damaged, guidewire and any associated componentry must be removed together. • Do not resterilize the catheter or accessories by any method. • Contents sterile and non-pyrogenic in unopened, undamaged package. STERILIZED BY ETHYLENE OXIDE • Do not re-use catheter or accessories as there may be a failure to adequately clean and decontaminate the device which may lead to contamination, catheter degradation, device fatigue, or endotoxin reaction. • Do not use catheter or accessories if package is opened or damaged. • Do not use catheter or accessories if any sign of product damage is visible or the use-by date has passed. • Do not use sharp instruments near the extension tubing or catheter lumen. • Do not use scissors to remove dressing. Precautions listed for the Duo-Flow® Catheter are as follows: • Examine catheter lumen and extensions before and after each treatment for damage. • To prevent accidents, ensure the security of all caps and bloodline connections prior to and between treatments. • Use only Luer Lock (threaded) Connectors with this catheter. • In the rare event that a hub or connector separates from any component during insertion or use, take all necessary steps and precautions to prevent blood loss or air embolism and remove the catheter. • Before attempting catheter insertion, ensure that you are familiar with the potential complications and their emergency treatment should any of them occur. • Repeated overtightening of bloodlines, syringes, and caps will reduce connector life and could lead to potential connector failure. • The catheter will be damaged if clamps other than what is provided with this kit are used. • Avoid clamping near the Luer Lock and hub of the catheter. • Clamping of the tubing repeatedly in the same location may weaken tubing. • The CMR substance Cobalt is a naturally occurring component of stainless steel. Based on biocompatibility evaluation it was determined that the main hazards of stainless steels are related to the processing of the material, especially welding, thus not applicable to the intended use of the device. Stainless steels used in these devices are unlikely to reach exposure levels that will elicit carcinogenicity, mutagenicity or reproductive toxicity.

Other Relevant Aspects of Safety: For a period of 01 January 2019 to 31 December 2023 there were 94 complaints for 208,951 units sold, giving an overall complaint rate of 0.045%. There were no death-related events. No events resulted in recalls during the review period.

Summary of Clinical Evaluation and Post-Market Clinical Follow-Up (PMCF)

Summary of Clinical Data Related to Subject Device

Specific Case Numbers (Mixed Cohort Case Numbers) Identified and Used for Clinical Performance Evaluation
Product Family Clinical Literature PMCF Data Total Cases User Survey Responses
Clinical Literature 460 (& 45 Mixed Cohort Cases) 29 489 (& 45 Mixed Cohort Cases) 0

Clinical performance was measured using parameters including but not limited to dwell time, catheter insertion outcomes, and adverse event rates. Critical clinical parameters extracted from these studies met standards set forth in the guidelines for the State of the Art. There were no unforeseen adverse events or other high occurrences of adverse events detected in any of the clinical activities. Medcomp® STHD catheters are subjected to, and must pass, simulated use testing intended to replicate 30 days use as part of device development. The Duo-Flow® Catheter passed this testing. Clinical guidelines recommend to limit the use of temporary, noncuffed, nontunneled dialysis catheters to a maximum of 2 weeks (KDOQI 2019), however, duration of use of these catheters has varied in available clinical evidence identified by the manufacturer to date. Although Medcomp® catheters materials contain non-degradable polymers, fully functional catheters may be removed for other reasons, such as intractable infection or change of therapy. Published clinical literature does not always focus on the physical lifetime of a catheter for these reasons. In the case of the Duo-Flow® Catheter, post market clinical follow- up activities and published literature have found mean durations of use ranging from 2 days to 4.53 months reported to date. Based on this information, the Duo-Flow® catheters have a 30 day lifetime; however, the decision to remove and/or replace the catheter should be based on clinical performance and need, and not any predetermined point in time.

Summary of Clinical Data Related to the Equivalent Device

Clinical evidence from published literature and PMCF activities has been generated specific to known and unknown variants of the subject device. The equivalency rationale in the updated clinical evaluation report will demonstrate that the clinical evidence available for these variants is representative of the range of device variants in the device family. Variants Relying on Equivalence:\n• 11.5F x 12cm and 24cm Straight Duo-Flow® Catheters\n• 11.5F x 12cm and 13.5cm Pre-Curved Duo-Flow® Catheters\n• 11.5F x 12cm, 15cm, and 20cm Pre-Curved Duo-Flow® Catheters w/ 2 Suture Wings\n• 9F x 15cm and 20cm Straight Duo-Flow® Catheters\n• 9F x 12cm, 15cm, and 20cm Pre-Curved Duo-Flow® Catheters\nVariants Contributing Clinical Data:\n• Duo-Flow® (Unknown Variant)\n• 11.5F x 15cm and 20cm Straight Duo-Flow® Catheters\n• 11.5F x 15cm and 20cm Pre-Curved Duo-Flow® Catheters\n• 11.5F x 15cm Raulerson IJ Duo-Flow® Catheter\n• 9F x 12cm Straight Duo-Flow® Catheter\nThere are no clinical or biological differences between variants within the subject device family, and the potential impact of the technical differences will be rationalized in the updated clinical evaluation report.

Summary of Clinical Data from Pre-Market Investigations (if applicable)

No pre-market clinical devices were used for the device's clinical evaluation.

Summary of Clinical Data from Other Sources

Source

Summary of Published Literature:Thirteen published literature articles representing 460 device family specific cases and 45 mixed cohort cases inclusive of the Duo-Flow® device family have been sourced by the manufacturer to date. The articles include five randomized controlled trials (Weijmer et al., 2008, Weijmer et. al., 2005, and Kukavica et al., 2009, Masolitin et al., 2022, Ratanarat et al., 2023), four prospective studies (Bingol et al., 2007, Elaldi et. al., 2001, Sramek et al., 2002, Baird et al., 2010), three retrospective studies (Demirkilic et. al., 2004, Haller et. al., 2009, Novak et. al., 1997), and one case study (Ekinci et al., 2018). Bibliography: Bingol H, Akay HT, Iyem H et al. Prophylactic dialysis in elderly patients undergoing coronary bypass surgery. Therapeutic apheresis and dialysis : official peer-reviewed journal of the International Society for Apheresis, the Japanese Society for Apheresis, the Japanese Society for Dialysis Therapy. 2007;11(1):30-5. Weijmer MC, Vervloet MG, ter Wee PM. Prospective follow-up of a novel design haemodialysis catheter; lower infection rates and improved survival. Nephrology, dialysis, transplantation : official publication of the European Dialysis and Transplant Association - European Renal Association. 2008;23(3):977-83. Demirkilic U, Kuralay E, Yenicesu M et al. Timing of replacement therapy for acute renal failure after cardiac surgery. Journal of cardiac surgery. 2004;19(1):17-20. Weijmer MC, Dorpel MAVD. Randomized, clinical trial comparison of trisodium citrate 30% and heparin as catheter-locking solution in hemodialysis patients. Journal of the American Society of Nephrology : JASN. 2005. Elaldi N, Bakir M, DÖKmetaŞ İ. Rapid diagnosis of catheter related sepsis in hemodialysis patients. Microbiology. 2000. Haller C, Deglise S, Saucy F et al. Placement of hemodialysis catheters through stenotic or occluded central thoracic veins. Cardiovascular and interventional radiology. 2009;32(4):695-702. Kukavica N, Resić H, Šahović V. Comparison of complications and dialysis adequacy between temporary and permanent tunnelled catheter for haemodialysis. Bosnian journal of basic medical sciences. 2009. Novak I, Sramek V, Pittrova H et al. Glutamine and other amino acid losses during continuous venovenous hemodiafiltration. Artificial organs. 1997;21(5):359-63. Šrámek V, Rokyta R, Matìjoviè M et al. Impact of continuous veno-venous hemodiafiltration on gastric mucosal carbon dioxide concentrations. Clinical Intensive Care. 2011;13(1):33-8. Baird JS. The sieving coefficient and clearance of vasopressin during continuous renal replacement therapy in critically ill children. Journal of critical care. 2010;25(4):591-4. Masolitin S, Protsenko D, Tyurin I, Mamontova O, Magomedov M, Kim T, Yaralyan A. The use of selective hemoperfusion in the treatment of toxic rhabdomyolysis complicated by acute kidney damage. Bulletin of Anesthesiology and Resuscitation. 2022;19(1). Ekinci F, Yildizdaş R, Horoz Öz, Alabaz D, Tolunay İ, Petmezci E. Treatment of severe leptospirosis with therapeutic plasma exchange in a pediatric patient. Turkish Journal of Pediatrics. 2018;60(5). Ratanarat, R., Phairatwet, P., Khansompop, S., & Naorungroj, T. (2023). Customized Citrate Anticoagulation versus No Anticoagulant in Continuous Venovenous Hemofiltration in Critically Ill Patients with Acute Kidney Injury: A Prospective Randomized Controlled Trial. Blood Purification, 52(5), 455-463.

Source

PMCF_Medcomp_211:The Medcomp User Survey acquired responses from healthcare personnel familiar with any number of Medcomp’s product offerings. 20 respondents responded that they or their facility have used Medcomp short-term hemodialysis catheters, with 0 of those respondents using the Duo-Flow® device. There were no differences in mean user sentiments within short-term hemodialysis catheters across State of the Art Performance and Safety Outcome Measures or between device types relating to safety or performance. The following data points were collected from users of Medcomp short-term hemodialysis catheters (n=20): • (Mean Likert Scale Response) Catheters function as intended – 4.8 / 5 • (Mean Likert Scale Response) Packaging allows for aseptic presentation – 4.9/5 • (Mean Likert Scale Response) Benefit outweighs the risk – 4.7 / 5 • Dwell Time (n=19) – 15.74 days (95%CI: 6.3 – 25.1)

Source

PMCF_STHD_211 (Retrospective Patient-Level Usage Data Survey):The Short-Term Hemodialysis (STHD) Product Line Data Collection Survey aimed to assess safety and performance outcome information for all variants of Medcomp STHD catheters. 19 survey responses were collected from 10 countries representing 381 device cases. 15 Duo-Flow® cases inclusive of several variant devices were collected. All cases were described as 11.5F and Pre-Curved, with representation of 15cm and 20cm length catheters. The following outcome measures were confirmed to be within State of the Art safety and performance outcome measures from published literature for Medcomp Duo-Flow® devices: • Dwell Time – 53.53 Days (95%CI: 40.27 – 66.80) • Procedural Outcomes – 100% • Catheter Related Blood Stream Infection – 1.24 per 1,000 catheter days (95%CI: 0 – 3.69) • Catheter Associated Venous Thrombus – 1.24 per 1,000 catheter days (95%CI: 0 – 3.69) • Exit Site Infection – 1.24 per 1,000 catheter days (95%CI: 0 – 3.69)

Source

PMCF_DLOCK_211 (Retrospective Database Analysis):The Netherlands 2021A data report is intended to assess safety and performance outcome information from collected data on Medcomp Long-Term Hemodialysis Catheters, Short-Term Hemodialysis Catheters, and 30.0% Duralock-C Locking Solution for use in EU MDR clinical evaluation. These outcome measures include dwell time, reasons for removal, exit site infection rates, catheter related blood stream infection (CRBSI) rates, and catheter associated venous thrombosis (CAVT) rates. Product family identification information was also included in the collected data. The dataset was provided by Marcel C. Weijmer, MD, PhD the head of the Department of Internal Medicine and Nephrology at OLVG located in Amsterdam, Netherlands. The dataset is comprised of consecutive cases from January 2010 to October 2019. The dataset was obtained 26 February 2021 and copied into a password protected un-editable format per QA-CL-400. 4 Duo-Flow® cases, described as 11.5F and Pre-Curved, were collected. The following outcome measures were collected for Medcomp Duo-Flow® devices: • Dwell Time – 28 days (Range: 6 – 64 days) • Catheter Related Blood Stream Infection – 2 Events Reported • Catheter Associated Venous Thrombus – 4 Events Reported • Exit Site Infection – No Events Reported

Source

PMCF_Infusion_211 (Retrospective Patient-Level Usage Data Survey):The Infusion Product Line Data Collection Survey aimed to assess safety and performance outcome information for all variants of Medcomp Infusion Ports, PICCs, Midlines, and CVCs. 70 survey responses were collected from 17 countries representing 471 device cases. 4 Duo-Flow® cases inclusive of several variant devices across French size (9F, 11.5F) and length (12cm, 15cm, 20cm) were collected. The following outcome measures were collected for Medcomp Duo-Flow® devices: • Dwell Time – 28 days (Range: 6 – 64 days) • Procedural Outcomes - 100% • Catheter Related Blood Stream Infection – No Events Reported • Catheter Associated Venous Thrombus – No Events Reported • Exit Site Infection – No Events Reported

Source

PMCF_STHD_242 (Short-Term Hemodialysis Truveta Data Analysis):The Short-Term Hemodialysis (STHD) Truveta data analysis assessed safety and performance outcome information for Medcomp® and competitor devices present in Truveta Studio. Truveta data comes from a growing collective of more than 30 health systems that provide 17% of the daily clinical care across all 50 U.S. states from 800 hospitals and 20,000 clinics, representing the full diversity of the United States. The population used for data analysis was derived utilizing Truveta Studio’s proprietary coding language (Prose) and unique device identifier (UDI) codes representing all saleable Medcomp® STHD devices and STHD devices distributed and/or manufactured by other companies. 6 Duo-Flow® cases inclusive of several variant devices were collected. Cases were described as 11.5F and Pre-Curved Cases included multiple French sizes (9F, 11.5F), configurations (straight, pre-curved), and lengths (12cm, 15cm, 20cm). The following State of the Art safety and performance outcome measures were observed for Medcomp Duo-Flow® devices: • Catheter Related Blood Stream Infection – 23.81 per 1,000 catheter days (95%CI: 2.88 - 86.01) • Catheter Associated Venous Thrombus – 0 per 1,000 catheter days (95%CI: 0 – 43.92) • Exit Site Infection – 0 per 1,000 catheter days (95%CI: 0 – 43.92) The catheter brand logistic regression model did not find that any Medcomp® catheter brands were statistically significantly associated with the incidence of CRBSI. The brand agnostic logistic regression found that Triple Lumen catheters OR: 1.63 (95%CI: 1.17 – 2.28) (as compared to the reference category of Double Lumen catheters) and Pre-Curved catheters OR: 7.26 (95%CI: 1.32 – 32.69) (as compared to the reference category of straight catheters) were statistically significantly associated with the incidence of CRBSI.

Overall Summary of Clinical Safety and Performance

Upon review of the Duo-Flow® catheter data across all sources, it is possible to conclude that the benefits of the subject device outweigh the overall and individual risks when the device is used as intended by the manufacturer. It is the manufacturer’s and clinical expert evaluator’s opinion that activities both complete and ongoing are sufficient to support the safety, efficacy, and acceptable benefit/risk profile of the subject devices.

Outcome Benefit/Risk Acceptability Criteria Desired Trend Clinical Literature (Subject Device) PMCF Data (Subject Device)
Performance Outcomes
Dwell Time Greater than 8 days + 2 days - 4.53 months (Summary of Published Literature)
53.53 days (PMCF_STHD_211) 28 days (PMCF_DLOCK_211)
Procedural Outcomes Greater than 95% + 100% (Summary of Published Literature)
100% (PMCF_STHD_211
PMCF_Infusion_211)
Safety Outcomes
Catheter Related Blood Stream Infection (CRBSI) Less than 7.8 incidents of CRBSI per 1,000 catheter days - 0 - 3.9 per 1
000 catheter days (Summary of Published Literature)
1.24 per 1
000 catheter days (PMCF_STHD_211) No Events Reported (PMCF_Infusion_211) 2 Events Reported (PMCF_DLOCK_211) 2 Events Reported (PMCF_STHD_242)
Exit Site Infection Rate Less than 3.5 incidents of exit site infection per 1,000 catheter days - 0 - 5.3 per 1
000 catheter days (Summary of Published Literature)
1.24 per 1
000 catheter days (PMCF_STHD_211) No Events Reported (PMCF_Infusion_211)
Catheter Associated Venous Thrombus (CAVT) Less than 11.4 incidents of CAVT per 1,000 catheter days + 4.3 - 7.2 per 1
000 catheter days (Summary of Published Literature)
1.24 per 1
000 catheter days (PMCF_STHD_211) No Events Reported (PMCF_Infusion_211 & PMCF_STHD_242) 4 Events Reported (PMCF_DLOCK_211)
*ND indicates no data on the clinical data parameter: **PMCF_Medcomp_211 asked respondents, if they agreed on a scale of 1 -5, that their experience in relation to each outcome was the same or better than the benefit/risk acceptability criteria.: ***The Practical Peritoneal Dialysis Study does not censor dwell time for reasons that would not be indicative of catheter performance, or include complete dwell time for catheters that remained implanted at the time of data collection. For these reasons, Medcomp does not believe this number is not aligned with the benefit/risk acceptability criteria.: *Complaint data may be associated with significant under-reporting

On-going or Planned Post-Market Clinical Follow-Up (PMCF)

Activity Description Reference Timeline
Multicenter Patient-Level Case Series Collect additional clinical data on the device PMCF_STHD_241 Q4 2025
State of the Art Literature Search Identify risks and trends with use of dialysis catheters SAP-HD Q1 2025
Clinical Evidence Literature Search Identify risks and trends with use of the device LRP-STHD Q3 2025
Global Trial Database Search Identify ongoing clinical trials involving the devices N/A Q3 2025

No emerging risks, complications or unexpected device failures have been detected from PMCF activities.

Possible Therapeutic Alternatives

The Kidney Disease Outcomes Quality Initiative (KDOQI) 2019 clinical practice guidelines have been used to support the below recommendations for treatments.

Therapy Benefits Disadvantages Key Risks
AV Fistula
  • Permanent vascular access solution
  • Lower complication rate than hemodialysis via catheter
  • Requires time to mature
  • Patients must sometimes self- cannulate
  • Stenosis
  • Thrombosis
  • Aneurysm
  • Pulmonary hypertension
  • Steal Syndrome
  • Septicemia
Hemodialysis Catheter
  • Useful for quick access.
  • Can be used as a bridge dialysis method between other therapies
  • Not a permanent solution
  • Catheter dysfunction can disrupt regular treatment
  • Post-procedural bleeding
  • Infection
  • Thrombosis
  • Decreased blood flow in dysfunctional catheter
Peritoneal Dialysis
  • Less restrictive diet than hemodialysis
  • Does not require hospitalization, can be done in any clean place
  • Clearance of impurities is limited by dialysate flow and peritoneal area
  • Peritonitis
  • Septicemia
  • Fluid overload
Kidney Transplant
  • Better quality of life compared to HD
  • Lower risk of death compared to HD
  • Fewer dietary restrictions compared to HD
  • Requires a donor which can take time
  • More risky for certain groups (aged, diabetics, etc.)
  • Patient must take rejection medication for life
  • Rejection medication has side effects
  • Thrombosis
  • Hemorrhage
  • Ureteral blockage
  • Infection
  • Organ rejection
  • Death
  • Myocardial infarction
  • Stroke
Comprehensive Conservative Care
  • Less imposed symptom burden than dialysis
  • Preserves life satisfaction
  • May aggravate clinical condition
  • Not designed to treat, but to minimize adverse events
  • Treatment may not actually minimize risks associated with CKD

Suggested Profile and Training for Users

The catheter should be inserted, manipulated, and removed by a qualified, licensed physician or other qualified health care professional under the direction of a physician.

Reference to Any Harmonized Standards and Common Specifications (CS) Applied

Harmonized Standard or CS Revision Title or Description Level of Compliance
EN 556-1 2001 Sterilization of medical devices. Requirements for medical devices to be designated "STERILE". Requirements for terminally sterilized medical devices Full
EN ISO 10555-1 2013+A1 2017 Intravascular catheters. Sterile and single- use catheters. General requirements
EN ISO 10555-3 2013 Intravascular catheters. Sterile and single- use catheters. Central venous catheters Full
EN ISO 10993-1 2020 Biological evaluation of medical devices — Part 1 Evaluation and testing within a risk management process
EN ISO 10993-7 2008+ A1 2022 Biological evaluation of medical devices — Part 7
EN ISO 10993-18 2020 Biological evaluation of medical devices — Part 18 Chemical characterization of medical device materials within a risk management process
EN ISO 11070 2014+A1 2018 Sterile single-use intravascular introducers, dilators and guidewires
EN ISO 11135 2014 + A1 2019 Sterilization of health-care products. Ethylene oxide. Requirements for the development, validation and routine control of a sterilization process for medical devices
EN ISO 11138-1 2017 Sterilization of health care products — Biological indicators Part 1 General requirements
EN ISO 11138-2 2017 Sterilization of health care products— Biological indicators—Part 2 Biological indicators for ethylene oxide sterilization processes
EN ISO 11138-7 2019 Sterilization of health care products. Biological indicators - Guidance for the selection, use and interpretation of results Full
EN ISO 11140-1 2014 Sterilization of health care products — Chemical indicators Part 1 General requirements
EN ISO 11607-1 2020 Packaging for terminally sterilized medical devices. Requirements for materials, sterile barrier systems and packaging systems Full
EN ISO 11607-2 2020 Packaging for terminally sterilized medical devices. Validation requirements for forming, sealing and assembly processes Full
EN ISO 11737-1 2018 + A1 2021 Sterilization of health care products. Microbiological methods. Determination of a population of microorganisms on products
EN ISO 13485 2016 + A11 2021 Medical Devices – Quality Management system - Requirements for Regulatory Purposes
EN ISO 14155 2020 Clinical investigation of medical devices for human subjects — Good clinical practice Full
EN ISO 14644-1 2015 Cleanrooms and associated controlled environments — Part 1 Classification of air cleanliness by particle concentration
EN ISO 14644-2 2015 Cleanrooms and associated controlled environments — Part 2 Monitoring to provide evidence of cleanroom performance related to air cleanliness by particle concentration
EN ISO 14971 2019+A11 2021 Medical devices. Application of risk management to medical devices
EN ISO 15223-1 2021 Medical devices — Symbols to be used with medical device labels, labelling and information to be supplied — Part 1 General requirements
EN ISO/IEC 17025 2017 General requirements for the competence of testing and calibration laboratories Full
PD CEN ISO/TR 20416 2020 Medical devices — post-market surveillance for manufacturers Full
EN ISO 20417 2021 Medical devices - Information to be supplied by the manufacturer. Full
EN 62366-1 2015+ A1 2020 Medical devices — Part 1
ISO 7000 2019 Graphical symbols for use on equipment. Registered symbols Partial
ISO 594-1 1986 Conical fittings with a 6 % (Luer) taper for syringes, needles and certain other medical equipment — Part 1 General requirements
ISO 594-2 1998 Conical fittings with a 6 % (Luer) taper for syringes, needles and certain other medical equipment — Part 2 Lock Fittings
MEDDEV 2.7.1 Rev 4 Clinical Evaluation A Guide for Manufacturers and Notified Bodies Under Directives 93/42/EEC and 90/385/EEC
MEDDEV 2.12/2 Rev. 2 GUIDELINES ON MEDICAL DEVICES POST MARKET CLINICAL FOLLOW-UP STUDIES A GUIDE FOR MANUFACTURERS AND NOTIFIED BODIES Full
MDCG 2020-6 2020 Clinical evidence needed for medical devices previously CE marked under Directives 93/42/EEC or 90/385/EEC Full
MDCG 2020-7 2020 Post-market clinical follow-up (PMCF) Plan Template A guide for manufacturers and notified bodies Full
MDCG 2020-8 2020 Post-market clinical follow-up (PMCF) Evaluation Report Template A guide for manufacturers and notified bodies Full
MDCG 2018-1 Rev. 4 Guidance on BASIC UDI-DI and changes to UDI-DI Full
MDCG 2019-9 2022 Summary of safety and clinical performance Full
ASTM D 4169-22 2022 Standard Practices for Performance Testing of Shipping Containers and Systems. Full
ASTM F2096-11 2019 Standard Test Method for Detecting Gross Leaks in Packaging by Internal Pressurization (Bubble Test) Full
ASTM F2503-20 2020 Standard Practice for Marking Medical Devices and Other Items for Safety in the Magnetic Resonance Environment Full
ASTM F640-20 2020 Standard Test Methods for determining Radiopacity for Medical Use Full
ASTM D4332-14 2014 Standard Practice for Conditioning Containers, Packages, or Packaging Components for Testing Full
Regulation (EU) 2017/745 2017 Regulation (EU) 2017/745 of the European Parliament and of the Council Full

Revision History

Revision Date CR# Author Description of Changes Validated
1 07NOV2022 27445 KO Initial Implementation of SSCP No, this version was not validated by the Notified Body as this is a Class IIa or IIb implantable device
2 27JUL2023 28323 GM Update in accordance with CER-020 Revision C No, this version was not validated by the Notified Body as this is a Class IIa or IIb implantable device
3 18OCT2023 28540 GM Correct Variant Description for 1072, 1074, 10541, and 1880-815-405 to "Raulerson IJ" No, this version was not validated by the Notified Body as this is a Class IIa or IIb implantable device
4 16SEP2024 29466 GM Update in accordance with CER-020 Revision D No, this version was not validated by the Notified Body as this is a Class IIa or IIb implantable device

Version 3.00 of Medical Components, Inc. Template QA-CL-200-1