Important Information
This Summary of Safety and Clinical Performance (SSCP) is intended
to provide public access to an updated summary of the main aspects
of the safety and clinical performance of the device. This SSCP is
not intended to replace the Instructions for Use as the main
document to ensure the safe use of the device, nor is it intended
to provide diagnostic or therapeutic suggestions to intended users
or patients.
Applicable Documents
| Document Type |
Document Title / Number |
| Design History File (DHF) |
17006, 11027 |
| ‘MDR Documentation’ File Number |
TD-020 |
1. Device Identification and General Information
Device Trade Name(s): Duo-Flow® Catheter
Manufacturer Name and Address: Medical
Components, Inc. 1499 Delp Drive Harleysville, PA 19438 USA
Manufacturer Single Registration Number (SRN):
US-MF-000008230
Basic UDI-DI: 00884908294NN
Medical Device Nomenclature: F900201 – Temporary
Hemodialysis Catheters and Kits
Class of Device: III
Date First CE Certificate Issued: March 2001
Authorized Representative Name and SRN: Gerhard
Frömel European Regulatory Expert Medical Product Service GmbH
(MPS) Borngasse 20 35619 Braunfels, Germany SRN: DE-AR-000005009
Notified Body Name and Single Identification Number:
BSI Netherlands NB2797
Device Grouping and Variants
The devices in scope of this document are all short-term
hemodialysis catheter sets. The device part numbers are organized
into variant categories. These devices are distributed as
procedure trays, in various configurations inclusive of
accessories and adjunctive devices (see section “Accessories
intended for use in combination with the Device”).
Variant Devices:
Variant Devices:
| Variant Description |
Part Number(s) |
Explanation of Multiple Part Numbers |
| 11.5F x 12cm Raulerson IJ Duo-Flow |
1072 |
n/a |
|
11.5F x 12cm Pre-Curved Duo-Flow w/ 2 Suture Wings
|
1365 |
n/a |
| 11.5F x 12cm Straight Duo-Flow |
1020 |
n/a |
| 11.5F x 13.5cm Raulerson IJ Duo-Flow |
10541 |
n/a |
| 11.5F x 15cm Pre-Curved Duo-Flow |
1316 |
n/a |
|
11.5F x 15cm Pre-Curved Duo-Flow w/ 2 Suture Wings
|
1362 |
n/a |
| 11.5F x 15cm Raulerson IJ Duo-Flow |
1073 1880-815-405 |
No significant clinical, biological, or technical difference
(only difference is branding)
|
| 11.5F x 15cm Straight Duo-Flow |
1021 1879-815-405 |
No significant clinical, biological, or technical difference
(only difference is branding)
|
| 11.5F x 20cm Raulerson IJ Duo-Flow |
1074 1880-820-405 |
No significant clinical, biological, or technical difference
(only difference is branding)
|
|
11.5F x 20cm Pre-Curved Duo-Flow w/ 2 Suture Wings
|
1363 |
n/a |
| 11.5F x 20cm Straight Duo-Flow |
1022 1879-820-405 |
No significant clinical, biological, or technical difference
(only difference is branding)
|
| 11.5F x 24cm Straight Duo-Flow |
1023 1879-824-405 |
No significant clinical, biological, or technical difference
(only difference is branding)
|
| 9F x 12cm Pre-Curved Duo-Flow |
1336 |
n/a |
| 9F x 12cm Straight Duo-Flow |
1064 1358 |
No significant clinical, biological, or technical difference
(only difference is branding)
|
| 9F x 15cm Pre-Curved Duo-Flow |
1337 |
n/a |
| 9F x 15cm Straight Duo-Flow |
1065 1353 |
No significant clinical, biological, or technical difference
(only difference is branding)
|
| 9F x 20cm Pre-Curved Duo-Flow |
1338 |
n/a |
| 9F x 20cm Straight Duo-Flow |
1066 1357 |
No significant clinical, biological, or technical difference
(only difference is branding)
|
Procedure Trays:
Procedure Trays:
| Catalog Code |
Part Number |
Description |
| XTP114CT |
1020 |
11.5F X 12cm Duo-Flow® Double Lumen Hemodialysis Catheter
Only Set
|
| XTP114IJC |
1072 |
11.5F X 12cm Duo-Flow® Double Lumen IJ Hemodialysis Catheter
Only Set
|
| XTP116CT |
1021 |
11.5F X 15cm Duo-Flow® Double Lumen Hemodialysis Catheter
Only Set
|
| XTP116IJC |
1073 |
11.5F X 15cm Duo-Flow® Double Lumen IJ Hemodialysis Catheter
Only Set
|
| XTP118CT |
1022 |
11.5F X 20cm Duo-Flow® Double Lumen Hemodialysis Catheter
Only Set
|
| XTP118IJC |
1074 |
11.5F X 20cm Duo-Flow® Double Lumen IJ Hemodialysis Catheter
Only Set
|
| XTP119CT |
1023 |
11.5F X 24cm Duo-Flow® Double Lumen Hemodialysis Catheter
Only Set
|
| DJIJ116 |
1880-815-405 |
11.5F X 15cm Duo-Jet® Double Lumen IJ Hemodialysis Catheter
Basic Set
|
| DJIJ118 |
1880-820-405 |
11.5F X 20cm Duo-Jet® Double Lumen IJ Hemodialysis Catheter
Basic Set
|
| DJST116 |
1879-815-405 |
11.5F X 15cm Duo-Jet® Double Lumen Hemodialysis Catheter
Basic Set
|
| DJST118 |
1879-820-405 |
11.5F X 20cm Duo-Jet® Double Lumen Hemodialysis Catheter
Basic Set
|
| DJST119 |
1879-824-405 |
11.5F X 24cm Duo-Jet® Double Lumen Hemodialysis Catheter
Basic Set
|
| DJST912 |
1358 |
9F X 12cm Duo-Jet® Double Lumen Hemodialysis Catheter Basic
Set
|
| DJST915 |
1353 |
9F X 15cm Duo-Jet® Double Lumen Hemodialysis Catheter Basic
Set
|
| DJST920 |
1357 |
9F X 20cm Duo-Jet® Double Lumen Hemodialysis Catheter Basic
Set
|
| DL11/24 |
1023 |
11.5Fx24cm Nikkiso Duo-Flow® Double Lumen Hemodialysis
Catheter Basic Set
|
| XTP114IJS-2 |
1365 |
11.5F X 12cm Duo-Flow® Double Lumen Pre-Curved Hemodialysis
Catheter W/Dual Suture Wing Basic Set
|
| XTP114IJSE |
1072 |
11.5F X 12cm Duo-Flow® Double Lumen IJ Hemodialysis Catheter
Basic Set
|
| XTP114MTE |
1020 |
11.5F X 12cm Duo-Flow® Double Lumen Hemodialysis Catheter
Basic Set
|
| XTP115IJSE |
10541 |
11.5 X 13.5cm Duo-Flow® Double Lumen IJ Hemodialysis
Catheter Basic Set
|
| XTP116IJS-1 |
1316 |
11.5F X 15cm Duo-Flow® Double Lumen Pre-Curved Hemodialysis
Catheter Basic Set
|
| XTP116IJS-2 |
1362 |
11.5F X 15cm Duo-Flow® Double Lumen Pre-Curved Hemodialysis
Catheter W/Dual Suture Wing Basic Set
|
| XTP116IJSE |
1073 |
11.5F X 15cm Duo-Flow® Double Lumen IJ Hemodialysis Catheter
Basic Set
|
| XTP116MTE |
1021 |
11.5F X 15cm Duo-Flow® Double Lumen Hemodialysis Catheter
Basic Set
|
| XTP118IJS-2 |
1363 |
11.5F X 20cm Duo-Flow® Double Lumen Pre-Curved Hemodialysis
Catheter W/Dual Suture Wing Basic Set
|
| XTP118IJSE |
1074 |
11.5F X 20cm Duo-Flow® Double Lumen IJ Hemodialysis Catheter
Basic Set
|
| XTP118MTE |
1022 |
11.5F X 20cm Duo-Flow® Double Lumen Hemodialysis Catheter
Basic Set
|
| XTP119MTE |
1023 |
11.5F X 24cm Duo-Flow® Double Lumen Hemodialysis Catheter
Basic Set
|
| XTP94IJS |
1336 |
9F X 12cm Duo-Flow® Double Lumen IJ Hemodialysis Catheter
Basic Set
|
| XTP94MT |
1064 |
9F X 12cm Duo-Flow® Double Lumen Hemodialysis Catheter Basic
Set
|
| XTP96IJS |
1337 |
9F X 15cm Duo-Flow® Double Lumen IJ Hemodialysis Catheter
Basic Set
|
| XTP96MT |
1065 |
9F X 15cm Duo-Flow® Double Lumen Hemodialysis Catheter Basic
Set
|
| XTP98IJS |
1338 |
9F X 20cm Duo-Flow® Double Lumen IJ Hemodialysis Catheter
Basic Set
|
| XTP98MT |
1066 |
9F X 20cm Duo-Flow® Double Lumen Hemodialysis Catheter Basic
Set
|
Configurations of Procedure Trays:
| Configuration Type |
Kit Components |
| Duo-Flow® Catheter Only Set |
(1) Catheter (1) Dilator (2) End Cap |
| Duo-Flow® Basic Set |
(1) Catheter (1) Guidewire (1) Guidewire Advancer (1) Needle
(1) Scalpel (1) Dilator (2) End Cap
|
2. Intended Use of the Device
Intended Purpose: The Duo-Flow® Catheters are
intended for use in adult patients with Acute Kidney Injury (AKI)
or Chronic Kidney Disease (CKD) for whom immediate central venous
vascular access for short-term hemodialysis is deemed necessary
based on the direction of a qualified, licensed physician. The
catheter is intended to be used under the regular review and
assessment of qualified health professionals. This catheter is for
Single Use Only.
Indication(s): The Duo-Flow® Catheter is
indicated for short-term use where vascular access is required for
less than 14 days for the purpose of hemodialysis.
Target Population(s): Duo-Flow® catheters are
intended for use in adult patients with Acute Kidney Injury (AKI)
or Chronic Kidney Disease (CKD) for whom immediate central venous
vascular access for short-term hemodialysis is deemed necessary
based on the direction of a qualified, licensed physician. The
catheter is not intended for use in pediatric patients.
Contraindications and/or Limitations:
-
Known or suspected allergies to any of the components of the
catheter or the kit.
-
This device is contraindicated for patients exhibiting severe,
uncontrolled coagulopathy or thrombocytopenia.
3. Device Description
Device Name: Duo-Flow® Catheter
Description of Device: The Duo-Flow® Catheter
removes and returns blood through two segregated lumen passages.
Each lumen is connected to an extension line with color-coded
female luer connectors. The transition between lumen and extension
is housed within a molded hub. Both arterial and venous lumens
contain side-holes. The catheter incorporates Barium Sulphate to
facilitate visualization under fluoroscopy or Xray. The catheter
has been tested at flow rates of up to 400 mL/min (9F Straight),
300ml/min (9F & 11F IJ), 450ml/min (11.5F Straight). The
catheter is available with a straight or pre- curved lumen in a
variety of French sizes and lengths to accommodate physician
preference and clinical needs. The pre-curved devices are not
suitable for femoral insertion.
Device Name: Duo-Jet® Catheter Nikkiso Duo-Flow®
Catheter
Description of Device: The Duo-Jet® Catheter
removes and returns blood through two segregated lumen passages.
Each lumen is connected to an extension line with color- coded
female luer connectors. The transition between lumen and extension
is housed within a molded hub. Both arterial and venous lumens
contain side-holes. The catheter incorporates Barium Sulphate to
facilitate visualization under fluoroscopy or Xray. The catheter
has been tested at flow rates of up to 300ml/min (11.5F Straight)
and 400 mL/min (9F Straight & 11.5F IJ). The catheter is
available with a straight or pre-curved lumen in a variety of
French sizes and lengths to accommodate physician preference and
clinical needs. The pre-curved devices are not suitable for
femoral insertion. Nikkiso Duo-Flow® Catheter The Nikkiso
Duo-Flow® Catheter removes and returns blood through two
segregated lumen passages. Each lumen is connected to an extension
line with color-coded female luer connectors. The transition
between lumen and extension is housed within a molded hub. Both
arterial and venous lumens contain side-holes. The catheter
incorporates Barium Sulphate to facilitate visualization under
fluoroscopy or Xray. The catheter has been tested at flow rates of
up to 400 mL/min.
Materials / Substances in Contact with Patient Tissue:
The percentage ranges in the table below are based on the weight
of the 11.5F X 12cm (10.21g) and 11.5F X 24cm (11.75g) Duo-Flow
catheters.
11.5F Duo-Flow
| Material |
% Weight (w/w) |
| Polyurethane |
42.96-47.81 |
| Acetal co-polymer |
20.40-23.47 |
| PVC |
15.83-18.22 |
| ABS |
6.25-7.20 |
| Vythene |
5.04 -5.80 |
| Barium sulfate |
2.35-4.66 |
The percentage ranges in the table below are based on the weight
of the 9F X 12cm (9.81g) and 9F X 20cm (10.41g) Duo-Flow
catheters.
9F Duo-Flow
| Material |
% Weight (w/w) |
| Polyurethane |
41.56-43.79 |
| Acetal co-polymer |
23.02 - 24.43 |
| PVC |
17.86-18.96 |
| ABS |
7.06 -7.49 |
| Vythene |
5.69-6.04 |
| Barium sulfate |
1.51-2.59 |
Note:Per the instructions for use, the device is contraindicated
for patients with known or suspected allergies to the above
materials.
Information on Medicinal Substances in the Device:
N/A
How the Device Achieves its Intended Mode of Action:
Hemodialysis catheters are centrally placed access tubes. A
typical hemodialysis catheter uses a thin, flexible tube. The tube
has two openings. The tube goes into a large vein. The vein is
usually the internal jugular vein. Blood withdraws through one
lumen of the catheter. The blood flows to the dialysis machine
through a separate tubing set. The blood is then processed and
filtered. The blood returns to the patient through the second
lumen. This device is used when dialysis must start at once.
Patients may not have a functioning AV fistula or graft. Catheter
hemodialysis normally happens on a short-term basis.
Sterilization Information: Contents sterile and
non-pyrogenic in unopened, undamaged package. Sterilized by
Ethylene Oxide.
Previous Generations / Variants:
| Name of Previous Generation |
Differences from Current Device |
| N/A |
N/A |
Accessories Intended for Use in Combination with the
Device:
| Name of Accessory |
Description of Accessory |
| Guidewire |
For general intravascular use to facilitate the selective
placement of medical devices in the vessel anatomy.
|
| Guidewire Advancer |
Aid for introduction of guidewire into target vein.
|
| Introducer Needle |
Used for the percutaneous introduction of guidewires.
|
| Scalpel |
A cutting device during surgical, pathology and minor
medical procedures
|
| Dilator |
Designed for percutaneous entry into a vessel in order to
enlarge the opening of the vessel for the placement of a
catheter in a vein.
|
| End Cap |
To keep clean and protect catheter luer between treatments.
|
| Syringe |
Attached to introducer needle to help capture blood return
once introducer needle perforates targeted vein, prevent air
embolism
|
Other Devices or Products Intended for Use in Combination with
the Device:
| Name of Device or Product |
Description of Device or Product |
| N/A |
N/A |
4. Risks and Warnings
Residual Risks and Undesirable Effects: All
surgical procedures carry risk. Medcomp® has implemented risk
management processes to proactively find and mitigate these risks
as far as possible without adversely affecting the benefit-risk
profile of the device. After mitigation, residual risks and the
possibility of adverse events from use of this product remain.
Medcomp® has determined that all residual risks are acceptable
when considered with respect to the expected clinical benefits of
the Duo-Flow® Catheter and the benefits of other similar
hemodialysis devices.
| Residual Harm Type |
Possible Adverse Events Associated with Harm
|
| Allergic Reaction |
Allergic Reaction Intolerance Reaction to Implanted
Device
|
| Bleeding |
Bleeding (May be severe) Exsanguination Femoral Artery Bleed
Hematoma Hemorrhage Retroperitoneal Bleed
|
| Cardiac Event |
Cardiac Arrhythmia Cardiac Tamponade
|
| Embolism |
Air Embolus
|
| Infection |
Bacteremia Endocarditis Exit Site Infection Septicemia
|
| Perforation |
Inferior Vena Cava Puncture Laceration of the Vessel
Perforation of the Vessel Pneumothorax Right Atrial Puncture
Subclavian Artery Puncture Superior Vena Cava Puncture
|
| Stenosis |
Venous Stenosis
|
| Tissue Injury |
Brachial Plexus Injury Exit Site Necrosis Mediastinal Injury
Pleural Injury
|
| Thrombosis |
Central Venous Thrombosis Lumen Thrombosis Subclavian Vein
Thrombosis Vascular Thrombosis
|
| Miscellaneous Complications |
Catheter Dysfunction Femoral Nerve Damage Hemothorax
Malposition Thoracic Duct Laceration
|
|
Quantification of Residual Risks
|
|
PMS Complaints (01 January 2017 – 31 December 2023)
|
PMCF Events |
|
Units Sold: 245,146 |
Units Studied: 29 |
|
Patient Residual Harm Category
|
% of Devices |
% of Devices |
| Allergic Reaction |
Not Reported |
Not Reported |
| Bleeding |
0.0004% |
Not Reported |
| Cardiac Event |
Not Reported |
Not Reported |
| Embolism |
Not Reported |
Not Reported |
| Infection |
Not Reported |
20.69% |
| Perforation |
Not Reported |
Not Reported |
| Stenosis |
Not Reported |
Not Reported |
| Tissue Injury |
Not Reported |
Not Reported |
| Thrombosis |
Not Reported |
10.34% |
Warnings and Precautions:
Warnings listed for the Duo-Flow® Catheter are as follows:
-
Do not insert catheter in thrombosed vessels.
-
Do not advance the guidewire or catheter if unusual resistance
is encountered.
-
Do not insert or withdraw the guidewire forcibly from any
component. If the guidewire becomes damaged, guidewire and any
associated componentry must be removed together.
-
Do not resterilize the catheter or accessories by any method.
-
Contents sterile and non-pyrogenic in unopened, undamaged
package. STERILIZED BY ETHYLENE OXIDE
-
Do not re-use catheter or accessories as there may be a failure
to adequately clean and decontaminate the device which may lead
to contamination, catheter degradation, device fatigue, or
endotoxin reaction.
-
Do not use catheter or accessories if package is opened or
damaged.
-
Do not use catheter or accessories if any sign of product damage
is visible or the use-by date has passed.
-
Do not use sharp instruments near the extension tubing or
catheter lumen.
- Do not use scissors to remove dressing.
-
Examine catheter lumen and extensions before and after each
treatment for damage.
-
To prevent accidents, ensure the security of all caps and
bloodline connections prior to and between treatments.
-
Use only Luer Lock (threaded) Connectors with this catheter.
-
In the rare event that a hub or connector separates from any
component during insertion or use, take all necessary steps and
precautions to prevent blood loss or air embolism and remove the
catheter.
-
Before attempting catheter insertion, ensure that you are
familiar with the potential complications and their emergency
treatment should any of them occur.
-
Repeated overtightening of bloodlines, syringes, and caps will
reduce connector life and could lead to potential connector
failure.
-
The catheter will be damaged if clamps other than what is
provided with this kit are used.
-
Avoid clamping near the Luer Lock and hub of the catheter.
-
Clamping of the tubing repeatedly in the same location may
weaken tubing.
-
The CMR substance Cobalt is a naturally occurring component of
stainless steel. Based on biocompatibility evaluation it was
determined that the main hazards of stainless steels are related
to the processing of the material, especially welding, thus not
applicable to the intended use of the device. Stainless steels
used in these devices are unlikely to reach exposure levels that
will elicit carcinogenicity, mutagenicity or reproductive
toxicity.
Other Relevant Aspects of Safety: For a period of
01 January 2019 to 31 December 2023 there were 94 complaints for
208,951 units sold, giving an overall complaint rate of 0.045%.
There were no death-related events. No events resulted in recalls
during the review period.
5. Summary of Clinical Evaluation and Post-Market Clinical
Follow-Up (PMCF)
Summary of Clinical Data Related to Subject Device
Specific Case Numbers (Mixed Cohort Case Numbers) Identified and
Used for Clinical Performance Evaluation
| Product Family |
Clinical Literature |
PMCF Data |
Total Cases |
User Survey Responses |
| Duo-Flow® |
460 (& 45 Mixed Cohort Cases) |
29 |
489 (& 45 Mixed Cohort Cases) |
0 |
Clinical performance was measured using parameters including but
not limited to dwell time, catheter insertion outcomes, and
adverse event rates. Critical clinical parameters extracted from
these studies met standards set forth in the guidelines for the
State of the Art. There were no unforeseen adverse events or other
high occurrences of adverse events detected in any of the clinical
activities. Medcomp® STHD catheters are subjected to, and must
pass, simulated use testing intended to replicate 30 days use as
part of device development. The Duo-Flow® Catheter passed this
testing. Clinical guidelines recommend to limit the use of
temporary, noncuffed, nontunneled dialysis catheters to a maximum
of 2 weeks (KDOQI 2019), however, duration of use of these
catheters has varied in available clinical evidence identified by
the manufacturer to date. Although Medcomp® catheters materials
contain non-degradable polymers, fully functional catheters may be
removed for other reasons, such as intractable infection or change
of therapy. Published clinical literature does not always focus on
the physical lifetime of a catheter for these reasons. In the case
of the Duo-Flow® Catheter, post market clinical follow- up
activities and published literature have found mean durations of
use ranging from 2 days to 4.53 months reported to date. Based on
this information, the Duo-Flow® catheters have a 30 day lifetime;
however, the decision to remove and/or replace the catheter should
be based on clinical performance and need, and not any
predetermined point in time.
Summary of Clinical Data Related to the Equivalent Device
Clinical evidence from published literature and PMCF activities
has been generated specific to known and unknown variants of the
subject device. The equivalency rationale in the updated clinical
evaluation report will demonstrate that the clinical evidence
available for these variants is representative of the range of
device variants in the device family.
Variants Relying on Equivalence:
11.5F x 12cm and 24cm Straight Duo-Flow® Catheters
11.5F x 12cm and 13.5cm Pre-Curved Duo-Flow® Catheters
11.5F x 12cm, 15cm, and 20cm Pre-Curved Duo-Flow® Catheters w/ 2
Suture Wings
9F x 15cm and 20cm Straight Duo-Flow® Catheters
9F x 12cm, 15cm, and 20cm Pre-Curved Duo-Flow® Catheters
Variants Contributing Clinical Data:
Duo-Flow® (Unknown Variant)
11.5F x 15cm and 20cm Straight Duo-Flow® Catheters
11.5F x 15cm and 20cm Pre-Curved Duo-Flow® Catheters
11.5F x 15cm Raulerson IJ Duo-Flow® Catheter
9F x 12cm Straight Duo-Flow® Catheter
There are no clinical or biological differences between variants
within the subject device family, and the potential impact of the
technical differences will be rationalized in the updated clinical
evaluation report.
Summary of Clinical Data from Pre-Market Investigations (if
applicable)
No pre-market clinical devices were used for the device's clinical
evaluation.
Summary of Clinical Data from Other Sources
Source:Summary of Published Literature
Thirteen published literature articles representing 460 device
family specific cases and 45 mixed cohort cases inclusive of the
Duo-Flow® device family have been sourced by the manufacturer to
date. The articles include five randomized controlled trials
(Weijmer et al., 2008, Weijmer et. al., 2005, and Kukavica et al.,
2009, Masolitin et al., 2022, Ratanarat et al., 2023), four
prospective studies (Bingol et al., 2007, Elaldi et. al., 2001,
Sramek et al., 2002, Baird et al., 2010), three retrospective
studies (Demirkilic et. al., 2004, Haller et. al., 2009, Novak et.
al., 1997), and one case study (Ekinci et al., 2018).
Bibliography:
Bingol H, Akay HT, Iyem H et al. Prophylactic dialysis in elderly
patients undergoing coronary bypass surgery. Therapeutic apheresis
and dialysis : official peer-reviewed journal of the International
Society for Apheresis, the Japanese Society for Apheresis, the
Japanese Society for Dialysis Therapy. 2007;11(1):30-5.
Weijmer MC, Vervloet MG, ter Wee PM. Prospective follow-up of a
novel design haemodialysis catheter; lower infection rates and
improved survival. Nephrology, dialysis, transplantation :
official publication of the European Dialysis and Transplant
Association - European Renal Association. 2008;23(3):977-83.
Demirkilic U, Kuralay E, Yenicesu M et al. Timing of replacement
therapy for acute renal failure after cardiac surgery. Journal of
cardiac surgery. 2004;19(1):17-20.
Weijmer MC, Dorpel MAVD. Randomized, clinical trial comparison of
trisodium citrate 30% and heparin as catheter-locking solution in
hemodialysis patients. Journal of the American Society of
Nephrology : JASN. 2005.
Elaldi N, Bakir M, DÖKmetaŞ İ. Rapid diagnosis of catheter related
sepsis in hemodialysis patients. Microbiology. 2000.
Haller C, Deglise S, Saucy F et al. Placement of hemodialysis
catheters through stenotic or occluded central thoracic veins.
Cardiovascular and interventional radiology. 2009;32(4):695-702.
Kukavica N, Resić H, Šahović V. Comparison of complications and
dialysis adequacy between temporary and permanent tunnelled
catheter for haemodialysis. Bosnian journal of basic medical
sciences. 2009.
Novak I, Sramek V, Pittrova H et al. Glutamine and other amino
acid losses during continuous venovenous hemodiafiltration.
Artificial organs. 1997;21(5):359-63.
Šrámek V, Rokyta R, Matìjoviè M et al. Impact of continuous
veno-venous hemodiafiltration on gastric mucosal carbon dioxide
concentrations. Clinical Intensive Care. 2011;13(1):33-8.
Baird JS. The sieving coefficient and clearance of vasopressin
during continuous renal replacement therapy in critically ill
children. Journal of critical care. 2010;25(4):591-4.
Masolitin S, Protsenko D, Tyurin I, Mamontova O, Magomedov M, Kim
T, Yaralyan A. The use of selective hemoperfusion in the treatment
of toxic rhabdomyolysis complicated by acute kidney damage.
Bulletin of Anesthesiology and Resuscitation. 2022;19(1).
Ekinci F, Yildizdaş R, Horoz Öz, Alabaz D, Tolunay İ, Petmezci E.
Treatment of severe leptospirosis with therapeutic plasma exchange
in a pediatric patient. Turkish Journal of Pediatrics. 2018;60(5).
Ratanarat, R., Phairatwet, P., Khansompop, S., & Naorungroj,
T. (2023). Customized Citrate Anticoagulation versus No
Anticoagulant in Continuous Venovenous Hemofiltration in
Critically Ill Patients with Acute Kidney Injury: A Prospective
Randomized Controlled Trial. Blood Purification, 52(5), 455-463.
Source:PMCF_Medcomp_211
The Medcomp User Survey acquired responses from healthcare
personnel familiar with any number of Medcomp’s product offerings.
20 respondents responded that they or their facility have used
Medcomp short-term hemodialysis catheters, with 0 of those
respondents using the Duo-Flow® device. There were no differences
in mean user sentiments within short-term hemodialysis catheters
across State of the Art Performance and Safety Outcome Measures or
between device types relating to safety or performance.
The following data points were collected from users of Medcomp
short-term hemodialysis catheters (n=20):
(Mean Likert Scale Response) Catheters function as intended – 4.8
/ 5
(Mean Likert Scale Response) Packaging allows for aseptic
presentation – 4.9/5
(Mean Likert Scale Response) Benefit outweighs the risk – 4.7 / 5
Dwell Time (n=19) – 15.74 days (95%CI: 6.3 – 25.1)
Source:PMCF_STHD_211 (Retrospective Patient-Level Usage Data
Survey)
The Short-Term Hemodialysis (STHD) Product Line Data Collection
Survey aimed to assess safety and performance outcome information
for all variants of Medcomp STHD catheters. 19 survey responses
were collected from 10 countries representing 381 device cases. 15
Duo-Flow® cases inclusive of several variant devices were
collected. All cases were described as 11.5F and Pre-Curved, with
representation of 15cm and 20cm length catheters.
The following outcome measures were confirmed to be within State
of the Art safety and performance outcome measures from published
literature for Medcomp Duo-Flow® devices:
Dwell Time – 53.53 Days (95%CI: 40.27 – 66.80)
Procedural Outcomes – 100%
Catheter Related Blood Stream Infection – 1.24 per 1,000 catheter
days (95%CI: 0 – 3.69)
Catheter Associated Venous Thrombus – 1.24 per 1,000 catheter days
(95%CI: 0 – 3.69)
Exit Site Infection – 1.24 per 1,000 catheter days (95%CI: 0 –
3.69)
Source:PMCF_DLOCK_211 (Retrospective Database Analysis)
The Netherlands 2021A data report is intended to assess safety and
performance outcome information from collected data on Medcomp
Long-Term Hemodialysis Catheters, Short-Term Hemodialysis
Catheters, and 30.0% Duralock-C Locking Solution for use in EU MDR
clinical evaluation. These outcome measures include dwell time,
reasons for removal, exit site infection rates, catheter related
blood stream infection (CRBSI) rates, and catheter associated
venous thrombosis (CAVT) rates. Product family identification
information was also included in the collected data. The dataset
was provided by Marcel C. Weijmer, MD, PhD the head of the
Department of Internal Medicine and Nephrology at OLVG located in
Amsterdam, Netherlands. The dataset is comprised of consecutive
cases from January 2010 to October 2019. The dataset was obtained
26 February 2021 and copied into a password protected un-editable
format per QA-CL-400. 4 Duo-Flow® cases, described as 11.5F and
Pre-Curved, were collected.
The following outcome measures were collected for Medcomp
Duo-Flow® devices:
Dwell Time – 28 days (Range: 6 – 64 days)
Catheter Related Blood Stream Infection – 2 Events Reported
Catheter Associated Venous Thrombus – 4 Events Reported
Exit Site Infection – No Events Reported
Source:PMCF_Infusion_211 (Retrospective Patient-Level Usage Data
Survey)
The Infusion Product Line Data Collection Survey aimed to assess
safety and performance outcome information for all variants of
Medcomp Infusion Ports, PICCs, Midlines, and CVCs. 70 survey
responses were collected from 17 countries representing 471 device
cases. 4 Duo-Flow® cases inclusive of several variant devices
across French size (9F, 11.5F) and length (12cm, 15cm, 20cm) were
collected.
The following outcome measures were collected for Medcomp
Duo-Flow® devices:
Dwell Time – 28 days (Range: 6 – 64 days)
Procedural Outcomes - 100%
Catheter Related Blood Stream Infection – No Events Reported
Catheter Associated Venous Thrombus – No Events Reported
Exit Site Infection – No Events Reported
Source:PMCF_STHD_242 (Short-Term Hemodialysis Truveta Data
Analysis)
The Short-Term Hemodialysis (STHD) Truveta data analysis assessed
safety and performance outcome information for Medcomp® and
competitor devices present in Truveta Studio. Truveta data comes
from a growing collective of more than 30 health systems that
provide 17% of the daily clinical care across all 50 U.S. states
from 800 hospitals and 20,000 clinics, representing the full
diversity of the United States. The population used for data
analysis was derived utilizing Truveta Studio’s proprietary coding
language (Prose) and unique device identifier (UDI) codes
representing all saleable Medcomp® STHD devices and STHD devices
distributed and/or manufactured by other companies. 6 Duo-Flow®
cases inclusive of several variant devices were collected. Cases
were described as 11.5F and Pre-Curved Cases included multiple
French sizes (9F, 11.5F), configurations (straight, pre-curved),
and lengths (12cm, 15cm, 20cm).
The following State of the Art safety and performance outcome
measures were observed for Medcomp Duo-Flow® devices:
Catheter Related Blood Stream Infection – 23.81 per 1,000 catheter
days (95%CI: 2.88 - 86.01)
Catheter Associated Venous Thrombus – 0 per 1,000 catheter days
(95%CI: 0 – 43.92)
Exit Site Infection – 0 per 1,000 catheter days (95%CI: 0 – 43.92)
The catheter brand logistic regression model did not find that any
Medcomp® catheter brands were statistically significantly
associated with the incidence of CRBSI. The brand agnostic
logistic regression found that Triple Lumen catheters OR: 1.63
(95%CI: 1.17 – 2.28) (as compared to the reference category of
Double Lumen catheters) and Pre-Curved catheters OR: 7.26 (95%CI:
1.32 – 32.69) (as compared to the reference category of straight
catheters) were statistically significantly associated with the
incidence of CRBSI.
Overall Summary of Clinical Safety and Performance
Upon review of the Duo-Flow® catheter data across all sources, it
is possible to conclude that the benefits of the subject device
outweigh the overall and individual risks when the device is used
as intended by the manufacturer. It is the manufacturer’s and
clinical expert evaluator’s opinion that activities both complete
and ongoing are sufficient to support the safety, efficacy, and
acceptable benefit/risk profile of the subject devices.
| Outcome |
Benefit/Risk Acceptability Criteria |
Desired Trend |
Clinical Literature (Subject Device) |
PMCF Data (Subject Device) |
| Performance Outcomes |
| Dwell Time |
Greater than 8 days |
+
|
2 days - 4.53 months (Summary of Published Literature)
|
53.53 days (PMCF_STHD_211) 28 days (PMCF_DLOCK_211)
|
| Procedural Outcomes |
Greater than 95% |
+
|
100% (Summary of Published Literature)
|
100% (PMCF_STHD_211, PMCF_Infusion_211)
|
| Safety Outcomes |
|
Catheter Related Blood Stream Infection (CRBSI)
|
Less than 7.8 incidents of CRBSI per 1000 catheter days
|
-
|
0 - 3.9 per 1000 catheter days (Summary of Published
Literature)
|
1.24 per 1000 catheter days (PMCF_STHD_211) No Events
Reported (PMCF_Infusion_211) 2 Events Reported
(PMCF_DLOCK_211) 2 Events Reported (PMCF_STHD_242)
|
| Exit Site Infection Rate |
Less than 3.5 incidents of exit site infection per 1000
catheter days
|
-
|
0 - 5.3 per 1000 catheter days (Summary of Published
Literature)
|
1.24 per 1000 catheter days (PMCF_STHD_211) No Events
Reported (PMCF_Infusion_211)
|
|
Catheter Associated Venous Thrombus (CAVT)
|
Less than 11.4 incidents of CAVT per 1000 catheter days
|
+
|
4.3 - 7.2 per 1000 catheter days (Summary of Published
Literature)
|
1.24 per 1000 catheter days (PMCF_STHD_211) No Events
Reported (PMCF_Infusion_211 & PMCF_STHD_242) 4 Events
Reported (PMCF_DLOCK_211)
|
*ND indicates no data on the clinical data parameter:
On-going or Planned Post-Market Clinical Follow-Up (PMCF)
| Activity |
Description |
Reference |
Timeline |
| Multicenter Patient-Level Case Series |
Collect additional clinical data on the device
|
PMCF_STHD_241 |
Q4 2025 |
| State of the Art Literature Search |
Identify risks and trends with use of dialysis catheters
|
SAP-HD |
Q1 2025 |
| Clinical Evidence Literature Search |
Identify risks and trends with use of the device
|
LRP-STHD |
Q3 2025 |
| Global Trial Database Search |
Identify ongoing clinical trials involving the devices
|
N/A |
Q3 2025 |
No emerging risks, complications or unexpected device failures
have been detected from PMCF activities.
6. Possible Therapeutic Alternatives
The Kidney Disease Outcomes Quality Initiative (KDOQI) 2019
clinical practice guidelines have been used to support the below
recommendations for treatments.
| Therapy |
Benefits |
Disadvantages |
Key Risks |
| AV Fistula |
-
Permanent vascular access solution
-
Lower complication rate than hemodialysis via catheter
|
- Requires time to mature
-
Patients must sometimes self- cannulate
|
- Stenosis
- Thrombosis
- Aneurysm
- Pulmonary hypertension
- Steal Syndrome
- Septicemia
|
| Hemodialysis Catheter |
- Useful for quick access.
-
Can be used as a bridge dialysis method between other
therapies
|
- Not a permanent solution
-
Catheter dysfunction can disrupt regular treatment
|
- Post-procedural bleeding
- Infection
- Thrombosis
-
Decreased blood flow in dysfunctional catheter
|
| Peritoneal Dialysis |
-
Less restrictive diet than hemodialysis
-
Does not require hospitalization, can be done in any
clean place
|
-
Clearance of impurities is limited by dialysate flow and
peritoneal area
|
- Peritonitis
- Septicemia
- Fluid overload
|
| Kidney Transplant |
-
Better quality of life compared to HD
-
Lower risk of death compared to HD
-
Fewer dietary restrictions compared to HD
|
-
Requires a donor which can take time
-
More risky for certain groups (aged, diabetics, etc.)
-
Patient must take rejection medication for life
-
Rejection medication has side effects
|
- Thrombosis
- Hemorrhage
- Ureteral blockage
- Infection
- Organ rejection
- Death
- Myocardial infarction
- Stroke
|
| Comprehensive Conservative Care |
-
Less imposed symptom burden than dialysis
- Preserves life satisfaction
|
- May aggravate clinical condition
-
Not designed to treat, but to minimize adverse events
|
-
Treatment may not actually minimize risks associated
with CKD
|
7. Suggested Profile and Training for Users
The catheter should be inserted, manipulated, and removed by a
qualified, licensed physician or other qualified health care
professional under the direction of a physician.
8. Reference to Any Harmonized Standards and Common Specifications
(CS) Applied
| Harmonized Standard or CS |
Revision |
Title or Description |
Level of Compliance |
| EN 556-1 |
2001 |
Sterilization of medical devices. Requirements for medical
devices to be designated "STERILE". Requirements for
terminally sterilized medical devices
|
Full |
| EN ISO 10555-1 |
2013+A1:2017 |
Intravascular catheters. Sterile and single- use catheters.
General requirements
|
Full |
| EN ISO 10555-3 |
2013 |
Intravascular catheters. Sterile and single- use catheters.
Central venous catheters
|
Full |
| EN ISO 10993-1 |
2020 |
Biological evaluation of medical devices — Part 1:
Evaluation and testing within a risk management process
|
Full |
| EN ISO 10993-7 |
2008+ A1:2022 |
Biological evaluation of medical devices — Part 7: Ethylene
oxide sterilization residuals – Amendment 1: Applicability
of allowable limits for neonates and infants
|
Full |
| EN ISO 10993-18 |
2020 |
Biological evaluation of medical devices — Part 18: Chemical
characterization of medical device materials within a risk
management process
|
Full |
| EN ISO 11070 |
2014+A1:2018 |
Sterile single-use intravascular introducers, dilators and
guidewires
|
Full |
| EN ISO 11135 |
2014 + A1: 2019 |
Sterilization of health-care products. Ethylene oxide.
Requirements for the development, validation and routine
control of a sterilization process for medical devices
|
Full |
| EN ISO 11138-1 |
2017 |
Sterilization of health care products — Biological
indicators Part 1: General requirements
|
Full |
| EN ISO 11138-2 |
2017 |
Sterilization of health care products— Biological
indicators—Part 2: Biological indicators for ethylene oxide
sterilization processes
|
Full |
| EN ISO 11138-7 |
2019 |
Sterilization of health care products. Biological indicators
- Guidance for the selection, use and interpretation of
results
|
Full |
| EN ISO 11140-1 |
2014 |
Sterilization of health care products — Chemical indicators
Part 1: General requirements
|
Full |
| EN ISO 11607-1 |
2020 |
Packaging for terminally sterilized medical devices.
Requirements for materials, sterile barrier systems and
packaging systems
|
Full |
| EN ISO 11607-2 |
2020 |
Packaging for terminally sterilized medical devices.
Validation requirements for forming, sealing and assembly
processes
|
Full |
| EN ISO 11737-1 |
2018 + A1: 2021 |
Sterilization of health care products. Microbiological
methods. Determination of a population of microorganisms on
products
|
Full |
| EN ISO 13485 |
2016 + A11:2021 |
Medical Devices – Quality Management system - Requirements
for Regulatory Purposes
|
Full |
| EN ISO 14155 |
2020 |
Clinical investigation of medical devices for human subjects
— Good clinical practice
|
Full |
| EN ISO 14644-1 |
2015 |
Cleanrooms and associated controlled environments — Part 1:
Classification of air cleanliness by particle concentration
|
Full |
| EN ISO 14644-2 |
2015 |
Cleanrooms and associated controlled environments — Part 2:
Monitoring to provide evidence of cleanroom performance
related to air cleanliness by particle concentration
|
Full |
| EN ISO 14971 |
2019+A11:2021 |
Medical devices. Application of risk management to medical
devices
|
Full |
| EN ISO 15223-1 |
2021 |
Medical devices — Symbols to be used with medical device
labels, labelling and information to be supplied — Part 1:
General requirements
|
Full |
| EN ISO/IEC 17025 |
2017 |
General requirements for the competence of testing and
calibration laboratories
|
Full |
| PD CEN ISO/TR 20416 |
2020 |
Medical devices — post-market surveillance for manufacturers
|
Full |
| EN ISO 20417 |
2021 |
Medical devices - Information to be supplied by the
manufacturer.
|
Full |
| EN 62366-1 |
2015+ A1: 2020 |
Medical devices — Part 1: Application of usability
engineering to medical devices
|
Full |
| ISO 7000 |
2019 |
Graphical symbols for use on equipment. Registered symbols
|
Partial |
| ISO 594-1 |
1986 |
Conical fittings with a 6 % (Luer) taper for syringes,
needles and certain other medical equipment — Part 1:
General requirements
|
Full |
| ISO 594-2 |
1998 |
Conical fittings with a 6 % (Luer) taper for syringes,
needles and certain other medical equipment — Part 2: Lock
Fittings
|
Full |
| MEDDEV 2.7.1 |
Rev 4 |
Clinical Evaluation: A Guide for Manufacturers and Notified
Bodies Under Directives 93/42/EEC and 90/385/EEC
|
Full |
| MEDDEV 2.12/2 |
Rev. 2 |
GUIDELINES ON MEDICAL DEVICES POST MARKET CLINICAL FOLLOW-UP
STUDIES A GUIDE FOR MANUFACTURERS AND NOTIFIED BODIES
|
Full |
| MDCG 2020-6 |
2020 |
Clinical evidence needed for medical devices previously CE
marked under Directives 93/42/EEC or 90/385/EEC
|
Full |
| MDCG 2020-7 |
2020 |
Post-market clinical follow-up (PMCF) Plan Template A guide
for manufacturers and notified bodies
|
Full |
| MDCG 2020-8 |
2020 |
Post-market clinical follow-up (PMCF) Evaluation Report
Template A guide for manufacturers and notified bodies
|
Full |
| MDCG 2018-1 |
Rev. 4 |
Guidance on BASIC UDI-DI and changes to UDI-DI
|
Full |
| MDCG 2019-9 |
2022 |
Summary of safety and clinical performance
|
Full |
| ASTM D 4169-22 |
2022 |
Standard Practices for Performance Testing of Shipping
Containers and Systems.
|
Full |
| ASTM F2096-11 |
2019 |
Standard Test Method for Detecting Gross Leaks in Packaging
by Internal Pressurization (Bubble Test)
|
Full |
| ASTM F2503-20 |
2020 |
Standard Practice for Marking Medical Devices and Other
Items for Safety in the Magnetic Resonance Environment
|
Full |
| ASTM F640-20 |
2020 |
Standard Test Methods for determining Radiopacity for
Medical Use
|
Full |
| ASTM D4332-14 |
2014 |
Standard Practice for Conditioning Containers, Packages, or
Packaging Components for Testing
|
Full |
| Regulation (EU) 2017/745 |
2017 |
Regulation (EU) 2017/745 of the European Parliament and of
the Council
|
Full |
Revision History
| Revision |
Date |
CR# |
Author |
Description of Changes |
Validated |
| 1 |
07NOV2022 |
27445 |
KO |
Initial Implementation of SSCP |
No, this version was not validated by the Notified Body as
this is a Class IIa or IIb implantable device
|
| 2 |
27JUL2023 |
28323 |
GM |
Update in accordance with CER-020 Revision C
|
No, this version was not validated by the Notified Body as
this is a Class IIa or IIb implantable device
|
| 3 |
18OCT2023 |
28540 |
GM |
Correct Variant Description for 1072, 1074, 10541, and
1880-815-405 to "Raulerson IJ"
|
No, this version was not validated by the Notified Body as
this is a Class IIa or IIb implantable device
|
| 4 |
16SEP2024 |
29466 |
GM |
Update in accordance with CER-020 Revision D
|
No, this version was not validated by the Notified Body as
this is a Class IIa or IIb implantable device
|